• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I swear, this project has been declared dead like 5 times already by the media. Is it actually dead this time?

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      And I seem to recall Apple themselves have declared it abandoned at least once before, haven’t they?

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    The main advantages of Apple Car® is that it runs on Apple Road® and Apple Fuel®. It was made of commonly available standardised components such as nuts and bolts but with special Apple Thread Pitch® that require Apple Spanner® to use them. There are no instruction manuals to repair Apple Car®, only Apple Dealership® is permitted. The outcome of the marketing effort causes the users to eventually become delusional about the product, believing that they own the best product and refusing to entertain any evidence to the contrary, much like religious beliefs.

  • magnetosphere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    My first guess is that it would have been overpriced and deliberately incompatible with existing chargers. No loss.

  • RedFox@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why do companies feel like that have to try and do everything?

    Why can’t you just ‘stay in your lane’ and be good at what you’re good at.

  • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    I would LOVE to know what, if any IP, patents, or tech came out of this whole thing. I’m guessing “not much”.

  • Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    they’re supposedly moving them over to AI?

    they could always return to a car, in the future, i guess. Right now people want AI (apparently)

  • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t get why Apple just didn’t buy a car maker. Like they could just buy the Mercedes Benz group. Why start from scratch?

    • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because Apple is not a car maker. Making their own electric car was already pretty weird - buying an auto maker and having to run it would have been a huge distraction.

      It would have made more sense for them to partner with another company on the car (maybe they even did?) than start buying and running a whole car company.

    • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Rivian feels like it would be right up apples alley, that said, I’m glad they didn’t, I’d like to purchase a Rivian some day, and I don’t want it to be part of the apple ecosystem

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      people think they should buy Disney and Nintendo and others, but Apples culture is its obsession, and they never buy giant companies only tiny ones.

    • golli@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      My opinion: Because Apple didin’t want to be a car manufacturer. It’s a low margin and capital intensive business (especially compared to what Apple does). And just becoming one of many wouldn’t actually move the needle on apples scale.

      Most articles I’ve read focus on the electric car part, but imo that nowadays is essentially a solved problem. And even when they started I think it should have been clear that electric cars will actually have less complexity than cars with combustion engines. And the hardest part is the battery chemistry, which will in the end also be a commodity.

      The general software they are already providing with Apple carplay and as seen this doesn’t really require them to build cars.

      The real technology problem to solve is autonomous driving. And it seems like Apple wasn’t really able to solve it or at least make faster progress than others. Similar to Tesla which hasnt been able to deliver on that front either and is the only car manufacturer priced as a technology company. Which would have been Apple’s goal.