• Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    I swear there were like 3 guys in the 60s or something that loved brutalism so much that they spent the next few years going to major cities to convince mayors to build the ugliest, most ghastly buildings that would remain as eyesores for decades to come.

      • PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Well the right hotel looks pretty decent, although seeing just bare concrete makes me want to indulge in suspicously cheap vodka and intoxicate myself for my entire life + depression.

        It has it’s weird charm, like looking back to the awful past of the USSR. These are a great reminder for us eastern europeans to never ever let another communist regime to power.

        Maybe I would love the brutalism’s uniqueness but this stigma is coming strong with me unfortunately.

        • abruptly8951@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Looks like the Barbican in London to me, it’s apartments and a public bar/drinking/working area, nice spot to hang out!

      • mle@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        For me personally that looks very interesting if that’s the right word, it pikes my curiousity, but it evokes a very uneasy feeling which would make me want to leave rather than hang around this area.

        Kind of “nothing is allowed here if it’s not with explicit purpose”

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Where I live there was a period in the 80s where people got obsessed with ‘roughcast’ and decided to start covering their houses with sharp rocks. I’d be scared of falling against them while drunk and tearing my face open.

            • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Like how close do you have to get before you can even see that it’s rough? Brutalism can be seen the second you see the building.

              • snooggums@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Depending on the coloration of the material in of the texture and how rough it is, several feet to hundreds of yards/meters away.

                But the reason brutalism is easier to see far away is more about the solid rectangular shapes and style than the texture of the material. If you made a concrete version of a building normallly made of stone with lots of fine details like a cathedral it wouldn’t be considered brutalism just because it was all concrete.

              • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Brutalism is also about showing the materials used for the structure rather than using facades. (But I don’t think anyone is saying rough rock coverings are brutalist lol)

  • PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I find some of the origin story fascinating. Apparently it almost started a war with Libya (2nd story).

    Only the bottom part of the sandcrawler was built for close-up scenes in the Tatooine desert for Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope. In Star Wars: Episode II Attack of the Clones these large vessels appeared on matte paintings. George Lucas took many pictures of the treads of NASA’s space rocket carrier (known as a crawler) as inspiration for the sandcrawler.

    https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Sandcrawler/Legends

    In Jay’s book, the author implies that the original shooting location of the Jawa Sandcrawler may have been a little too close to the Libyan border for Gaddafi’s comfort, because the Libyan government “rushed inspectors across the border to ensure Lucas’s crew wasn’t constructing some newfangled military vehicle.”

    The vehicle’s original design was conceived by Colin Cantwell, and was later redesigned by Ralph McQuarrie, one of the most famous of the Star Wars designers. It was modeled after NASA moon rovers from the time. There were smaller models, of course, used for effects shots, but the bottom half of outsize Sandcrawler — complete with tank treads — was also built to accommodate a notable scene where Luke Skywalker’s uncle buys R2-D2 from the Jawas.

    https://www.slashfilm.com/1257153/star-wars-sand-crawler-mistaken-for-real-military-vehicle-filming-a-new-hope/

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    “It’s not brutalism, it’s concrete expressionism!” Or some shit like that.

    I can only think they thought it looked good from a distance, which it still doesn’t but from making a little model it can seem clean and all that.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you’re basing that off the Pic, that is not brutalism. Brutalism is awesome though, like a modern day architecture terrible from the 20th century totalitarians. Unpopular opinion, but I’ve always thought the Chinese did it best

      • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, when these is some real design work, rather than just big concrete block, brutalism can look very cool. However most places seemed to want to just go with dismal box as an aesthetic.

        • mommykink@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nah I love big box brutalism. Gimme gimme gimme all those long, labyrinthine, resource-conscious angular concrete buildings. Just looking at my campus’s inexplicably brutalist administrations office was my favorite part of university

          • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I mean, there has to be someone that gets turned on by ugly, nothing wrong with that. Most people don’t like it though.

      • Dasnap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        There is a middle ground. Living in a concrete block city probably isn’t the best for your mental health.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Show me an office tower that is not built with wrought iron and concrete. The thing people don’t like about Brutalism is its honesty. If a layer of chinzy art deco spray painted Styrofoam is the difference between making it through the day and cracking up, you’ve got bigger problems.

          This also heavily undersells how beautiful a clever concrete structure can be. I’ll take eye-popping geometries of stone over flat texture-less mirror-window walls any day.

  • Asafum@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Lol I JUST heard this exact reference, image to word, in a “stuff you should know” podcast. They just couldn’t remember the name of the sand crawler.

    Life can be pretty weird, or you heard it too lol