Is he telling us he considers himself low T? Because it looks like he’s believing something he saw on 4chan.
He’s so dense he doesn’t realize he’s the low T person being described, not the alpha male.
He claims he’s autistic and has a breeding fetish so doubtless he thinks he’s twice as capable of sorting out truthiness.
“High T alpha males” oh good, they invented a new gender again and it sucks.
Bring out the scones and cucumber sandwiches, it’s high T!
Mmm, high tea… Haven’t played that in a while.
I’m a high T male, which is why I started balding at 20 and my balls are the size of grapes
Balding is not related to testosterone, but rather Dihydrogentestosterone (commonly referred to as DHT). Although high testosterone levels often mean high DHT levels as well, it is possible to have high DHT whilst still having low testosterone levels.
The amount of androgen receptors in your scalp is also relevant, some people are just unlucky and have lots of androgen receptors in that area and start balding at a young age despite average DHT levels
I started balding at 18. Is this what being alpha is like?
like, super alpha this time. S rank Alpha, but with a T. Best alpha this time, we promise.
How does it compare to sigma tho?
Meh, I’ll just wait for the full release. Less bugs that way.
i enjoyed this. also i think healthy forms of hyper gender are valid
Ice-T on drugs
All the “high T alpha males” I’ve ever met are also the least critical thinkers I’ve ever met.
And none of them have ever backed it up with a blood test
>be me >high T alpha male born to breed and lead >go to doc to confirm I am the most alpha of all >doc says your T levels are through the roof >fuck yeah it is I am a total chad >doc is like nah bruh you got the big C >mfw I only have 6 weeks to live
I got bic cockser. hel yea B)
Yeah I tend to think that anyone who identifies as high t alpha male is actually just the opposite.
They are usually the ones seeking admiration and approval. Meanwhile the free thinkers are just doing our days and caring for our tribes. No approval needed.
Alpha males ain’t shit. I’m a Neutrino male. Highest penetration power 😤
Can’t even feel anything though. Can you penetrate any harder my guy?
As a beta, I can only penetrate a few millimeters but I can do a lot of damage if swallowed.
10/10 physics joke right here folks
I guess they forgot that people like Martin Luther King Jr. got shot and killed for speaking out against these so called “high T, alpha males.”
Being proud of using intimidation tactics is fucking weird and pathetic. Blaming it on garbage pseudo science lowers the bar into degeneracy. THEN turning it into victim blaming…“you’re too weak to have anything worthwhile to contribute” is just… wow.
Evolutionary psychology was an interesting hypothesis, but it will never recover from these dipshits utilizing it as the loudest dog whistle in history…used to justify sexism and bigotry. I wish they’d all get in elons rocket and be the first people to land on the sun.
Powerful does not mean the same thing as “high T alpha male”.
Studies show that higher testosterone is associated with increased desire for fair competition and fair outcomes.
Anyone who puts a bullet into someone who challenges them is not a high status male. Power is not the same thing as status here.
What an interesting part of my comment to nitpick.
Either you have an issue with the terminology…in which case take the terminology issues to Elon. I sure as fuck didn’t invent the terms.
Or you buy into whatever garbage comes out his mouth. In which case don’t talk to me.
TLDR; “weak people have to conform to social consensus otherwise they get hurt I guess?”
I, on the other hand, am a big, strong, high T alpha male, that isn’t worried about what anyone thinks! I am a free thinker, and I know my opinions are correct because I instantly based this entire opinion on a subjective, anecdotal view of the world that I then extrapolated meaning out of, the best evidence! /s
as someone with autism do NOT let us control everything. You’d get 27,000 cats and a ton of trains without any issues being solved.
I think a ton of trains would actually solve a lot of issues
yeah maybe we should let them cook for a bit
My go to example for “we should have let them cook” is https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OGAS
A ton of trains would be less than one train
Fine, we’ll upgrade to a shit ton instead.
cats too tbh
Ironically may result in the resurgence of the bee population due to cats murdering the bird population
A government of autists would come up with optimized solutions to many problems. The issue is that most people are resistant to actually fixing things, so everyone would just get mad.
optimised solutions often create negative secondary effects in other systems - it’s not (always) that people are resistant to fixing things, it’s that when people get attached to an “optimised solution” and it comes into contact with the real world, it’s often difficult for them to take valid criticisms that aren’t about the system
It’s almost always for a selfish reason though. For instance, health insurance in the U.S. could easily go away if the government combined all of the funding for public healthcare systems. It won’t happen because of the for profit healthcare industry.
Do not betray your own tribe brother. After all, why shouldn’t we get 27000 cats?
I’m allergic.
skill issue
“Pele who can’t defend themselves physically”
Like Elon, who pulled out of a fight he tried to start with Zuck because he’d get his ass kicked?
I think his mom told him not to.
I find it unlikely he’d listen to a woman. Unless maybe she threatened to take away the power cord
I’m still hoping this happens and leads to a WWE style outcome.
Elon has a heart attack on the ring and falls on top of Zuck pinning and smothering him. Zuck is forced to tap and Elon is stretchered out the ring
“Critical thinking skills only count if they’re MY critical thinking skills” do they not see the irony?
There is a baseline assumption that “logical thinking” means everyone reaches the same conclusions.
It largely depends on what lense you parse your logic through, if its the lense of accumulating wealth and power you will almost always reach the same conclusion, the same if you use dialectical Materialism you will almost always reach yhe same conclusion. In the first instance you wont be able to understand how others can’t see the truths that are burning into your retinas, while in the latter truth you will understand exactly why they avoid the rubric of logic which brings makes their lifestyle unable to accept they are everythig wrong with the world and dragging us int a greenhouse heat death in the pursuit of profit.
the same if you use dialectical Materialism you will almost always reach yhe same conclusion
Material and historical conditions vary widely. Dialectical Materialism exists to synthesize solutions to a variety of contradictions. Stalin, Mao, and Tito reached some very different conclusions, despite growing up during the same international conflagration. Subsequent leftist revolutionaries - from Che to Chavez, had their own takes on the best path forward. A lot of leftist infighting can be attributed to these differences in baseline material condition.
A relatively wealthy leftist living in the imperial core is going to have this sense of living in a post-scarcity world with a relatively liberal social order, while a Philippian labor organizer is going to be struggling just to survive while the state’s brutal police forces actively hunt them. Chinese communists and Vietnamese communists have a very acrimonious history together and are easily pitted against one another by European industrialists. And coalition building between northern Indian communist farmers and the Kashmiri neighbors who they are in economic competition with is extremely difficult.
While you can always talk about the straight hyper-moral correct positions, they don’t always lend themselves to the physical labor involved in building local movements or the historical biases native to your region.
One big take away of dialectical materialism is that outcomes aren’t clear and conclusions aren’t certain. You always need to try things, anticipate failure, and move forward from there. You can’t trap yourself in rigid ideology or you’ll find that ideology used against you as soon as capitalist leadership can adopt that rhetoric.
Or if they’re like a few people I know…whose critical thinking skills are “parrot opinions from someone who I think is almost as smart as me (according to me) because I exclusively listen to them”
high T alpha male
in other words, an asshole
we all saw how that went with Andrew Tate. His high testosterone levels give him his sound judgement skills and wisdom
dude we’ve seen you in swimwear. you look like a barrel on a stick. you can’t act like you’re prime specimen anymore. fucking troglodyte.
Whenever you find yourself thinking about “how to get rid of the others”, you’ve already taken a wrong turn somewhere like this.
Although I think it’s fair to think about getting rid of those who want to get rid of others. Just make it a hard line: only those, no others.
Is this about getting rid of others somehow?
Ironic that only a source of “trust me bro, this is how the NPCs work” is all that’s needed for Musk to be like: “Derp my filter says it’s true! This must be true because it’s on 4chan, no sources or further thoughts needed…”
“Well, back to my compound, security guards, and lobbyists that protect me from the majority!”
I’m yet another Autistic person chiming in here to say that Elon is an ass clown
I’ve met plenty of neurotypicals who defied group think, so this isn’t even close to right
You folks know what’s up though, you don’t need me to tell you anything here. Love you guys, sorry we have a jackass amongst our population, you know how it is
I’ve met plenty of neurotypicals who defied group think, so this isn’t even close to right
Well, maybe those neurotypicals had a lot of T cells.
Nah man they evolved into a new class of existence, they went from high T to super U cells
