• 312@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is Musk’s “Reichstag Fire” moment for Twitter.

    The rate limiting is not because of “extreme manipulation”, but because of piss-poor code that Twitter deployed as part of their change to only allow tweets to be viewed if logged in. Twitter is effectively DDoSing itself right now. But, it creates an opportunity for Musk to create a narrative.

    These “temporary” limits will probably remain inevitably, as they provide another benefit to Twitter - they drive Blue subscriptions. Unfortunately, they also repel free users from using the platform entirely, and at a much higher ratio.

    Twitter is going to become even more of a cesspool than it already is at an alarming rate. Crazy how many established social media platforms have decided to crumble at the exact same time.

    • fidodo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It goes deeper than that.

      This all started with the API changes. Before they were charging a fair price for the API and companies happily paid it for the convenience. Then Elon got greedy he started charging a ridiculous amount for the API so those companies decided it would be worth it to just deal with the annoyance and switch to scraping the website instead. But when you hit the website it’s way less efficient than hitting the API because it’s doing a bunch of mixing and ranking which is a lot more complicated and costly than serving static content, which costs a small fraction of real time algorithmic ranking. So now instead of making money off companies that want their data they’re losing money on the cloud costs to serve the scrapers.

      More recently, they haven’t been paying their hosting bills to Google and their service was set to expire at the end of last month. What just happened at the start of this month? They added the limitations. That can’t be a coincidence. Now the Google services weren’t hosting the site itself, otherwise they’d probably be fully down right now, but it was hosting their trust and safety services for things like fighting spam. That could have also been hosting anti scraper services as well. Since they’re so under staffed they probably couldn’t swap the services in time, so instead of having anti scraping services like every other big company on the internet, they decided to cut service instead. It’s just built up incompetence coming to a head.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, they also repel free users from using the platform entirely, and at a much higher ratio.

      This is really, really bad for Twitter. The whole reason so many groups and people use it for official communications and announcements is because their audience can easily and freely see it. Rate limiting and requiring an account completely destroy that. And without it, Twitter really doesn’t have much to offer.

      Plus this goes directly against advertising lol

    • coldv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I find it especially bizarre that spez took inspiration and guidance from Musk. I can entertain the possibility of Musk intentionally driving Twitter to the ground (though he sure is taking the scenic route), but Reddit? It just seems like the rich tech bros have collectively lost their minds

    • Striker@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hello. I am a moderator of this community. Just commenting here to let you know you can use bad language in a lemmy and in this server. No need to censor yourself. We don’t give a fuck.

    • twitterfluechtling@lemmy.pathoris.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Read” means they are displayed in your browser. I used to have Twitter open and hit reload once in a while during work, I definitely loaded more than 300 Tweets per day, especially when clicking on an interesting one once in a while loading all the replies automatically.

      • vintprox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ahha, as I suspected. Of course, despite having stats for each and every tweet in database, they wouldn’t even care to check if some particular tweet was loaded for the user. That’s not an issue though, Twitter is just a walled garbage.

  • jamesoh5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a former individual who understands the underlying systems, it seems like they botched deployment of a new feature causing issues and cannot figure out how to solve them.

    Most of Twitter is and has been in maintenance mode since acquisition (think of 10 man engineering team and 1 left to handle maintenance).

    • root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I heard similar; That this was the result of a migration away from Googles storage, which was cut off before they had the replacement fully set up. So they lost a ton of data and are severely limited in what they can display.

      This is just what I’ve heard.

    • root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I heard similar; That this was the result of a migration away from Googles storage, which was cut off before they had the replacement fully set up. So they lost a ton of data and are severely limited in what they can display.

      This is just what I’ve heard.

    • Sunrosa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve noticed that my batch image downloader works on maybe 40% of all twitter posts, and only 40% of the time (It used to work 100% of the time before Musk arrived). It’s fucking annoying. I think they’re having major API and CDN issues.

    • Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is why it cracks me up every time when someone is praising Elon for “cutting slack” when firing all those twitter employees. Yes, twitter did not implode immediately. Turns out, people can build software that is stable enough to run in maintenance mode. But good luck dealing with new issues cropping up.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        People too far removed from IT/Dev team can become disillusioned as to what they do.

        If you have a good dev team, you won’t hear about them doing anything until shit hits the fan. If you haven’t heard from them?… They’re doing their job. Leave them alone.

    • root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I heard similar; That this was the result of a migration away from Googles storage, which was cut off before they had the replacement fully set up. So they lost a ton of data and are severely limited in what they can display.

      This is just what I’ve heard.

      • jb007gd@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I heard similar; That this was the result of a migration away from Googles storage, which was cut off before they had the replacement fully set up. So they lost a ton of data and are severely limited in what they can display.

        This is just what I’ve heard.

  • CrazyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t twitter just default on a massive google cloud bill on the first of July? This is pure speculation, but it wouldn’t surprise me if the rate limiting is a direct consequence of them having to massively scale back infra because of getting kicked from Google cloud

  • wes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    After dropping third party support I only read more and more questionable decisions by Musk in the news.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean I see why Reddit and Twitter are doing it. We’re in a really weird transitional period of the internet right now, for better or for worse. They’re doing it to prevent scraping, because why would you read all these garbage tweets to get to the information you need when an ChatGPT can spit out the exact information without fluff? It’s taking their content without any funding back to them, effectively stealing their revenue.

    So what are these companies to do? Honestly I hope this is birth to a new form of social media, and this benefits the fedi greatly. It will be unsustainable to run large social media companies like theirs who profit off of user data and content. Whereas tons of fedi servers ran by hobbiest, effectively ran out of pocket or by donations, is much more sustainable. They’re doing it for community and more pure content that everyone wants without corporate fluff. If ChatGPT scrapes the fedi community, that’s okay because the fedi isn’t designed to make money so nothing is lost.

    • Justas🇱🇹@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      At the start of social media, companies ran on investment money and did their best to grow as fast as possible. Now they are trying to start supporting themselves and their efforts are often counter productive. As boomers retire, less and less investment money will be available, so you should expect more of this mess in the future.

  • stovemilk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean look on the bright side: he’s encouraging Twitter users to touch grass

  • HPTF@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    At the risk of sounding tin-foily…

    Twitter’s financials for server costs have never made sense - the amount of money required to serve the sheer volume of engagement can’t possibly have been resolved by ads that Elon is somehow refusing to keep tapping into.

    I’d wager that some other interested party engaged in some type of private-public partnership was floating costs for (let’s call it “privileged”) access to the backend of Twitter – granting a bottomless pit of funding to keep the platform running no matter the cost.

    Once Twitter left the hands of someone deemed trustworthy, that life support doesn’t stick around – leaving Twitter facing complete insolvency by October of this year unless Musk literally does whatever he can to reduce engagement to save on costs.

    Twitter loses more money when it has more engagement. If you have 100k users and add a new one, every interaction that additional user makes with tweets viewed by those 100k existing users requires 100k updates pushed to those 100k users’ pages. Every like sends an update of +1 like on the tweet to every one of the 100k users. It becomes significantly more expensive per user engagement.

    The ads being seen by additional users don’t cover that constantly-compounding cost to keep engagements up to date across the platform. Musk isn’t being honest about the reasoning (web scraping issues my ass) and is scrambling to buy desperately-needed to keep the platform up past October.

    I think this goes to show just how impossible a business model like Twitter’s was from the jump and shines a light on the absurdity of it being self-sustaining without a massive source of reliable external funding.

    Edit: fixed typo

    • S_204@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were previously publicly traded were they not? How do you figure that backend funding worked if it wasn’t shown on the balance sheet?

      • Candelestine@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Simple. Jews owned all the funding sources, regulatory agencies that were supposed to watch for this, industry-insiders that could have blown a whistle and the media companies that could have investigated. Anyone who could possibly threaten this structure is blasted by the space lasers.

        Obviously.

        • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I am fairly certain that “obviously” is your sarcasm tag, but I work with people this stupid/racist which makes me a little sad.

    • New_account@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The past 15 years of growth in anything technology adjacent has been fueled by one thing: Extremely cheap debt. Interest rates have at been rock bottom since the 2008 crisis, and they’ve only started to tick up recently. That means the ability to fund infinite growth for basically nothing, so tech companies have relied heavily on debt financing.

      Now though, that’s no longer viable. Silicon Valley Bank was very heavily involved with all these tech companies, and it went insolvent in March largely because of rising interest rates. They held a lot of long term bonds at low interest rates. In normal conditions, rising interest rates mean lower bond prices and unrealized losses, but not a major problem because they can just hold them to maturity and never realize the loss. Bank runs forced SVB to sell the bonds for huge losses though, turning unrealized losses into realized losses, and a non-issue into a major problem.

      Now that cheap debt is gone, these tech companies are desperately scrambling to attain profitability. It hasn’t been discussed much, but this is a big reason for the changes at both Twitter and Reddit.