• Fetus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Between 1980 and 2015, The catholic church paid over $275 million of compensation to victims of child sexual abuse in Australia.

      In the US, they spent over $300 million on costs related to clergy abuse. In one year.

      To put that into perspective, imaging earning minimum wage in the US, full time hours. Now imaging working for 50 years, saving every single cent you make. You haven’t earnt enough to cover a single day of those costs.

      All in all, http://www.bishop-accountability.org claim that the church has paid about $4 billion on child sexual abuse cases. This doesn’t include the money they spent moving paedophiles around the world so that they can continue to abuse kids.

      But we may never know how much money the church really has, because they are actively hiding assets to minimise their value, in an attempt to limit the amount they have to pay to the victims of their crimes.

      • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hot damn. 4 billion total so far and its probably them trying hard paying as little as possible. So thats got to be like what, 1-5% of what they actually possess?

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you want that figure in tons of nazi gold or tons of stolen artifacts?

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    You and your org lost control of the rich class a long time ago, organized religion is just for the commoners these days. You have no power here, the stock market has taken them fully.

    • hh93@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Noone is forcing anyone to eat meat or fly

      Sure the 0,1% polluting 1000 times as much as average people is really shitty but just cutting their emissions down will not solve the problem

      Making huge changes among the population is necessary, too.

      Obviously you need to tackle the rich, too, in order to get the population on your side but for laws to happen you also need a decent part of the population already agreeing with that law and living by it.

    • kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Animal agriculture is currently using an amount of land that’s the equivalent of the entirety of North America.

      • DankMemeMachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah but people need food, people don’t need hundreds of flights on a private jet each year. One problem is easier to solve than the other so we should start there.

        • kandoh@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Animal agriculture uses more food than it produces. You need to feed the animals and the meat they produce is considerably less food than what they consumed.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    He needs to excommunicate leaders that don’t pass sweeping legislation. He won’t but that would be the only way to force their hand.

  • eee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    The rich, on their private jets: “can’t hear you, too busy eating caviar”

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I urge the pope to make profound changes to tackle the pedophilia crisis.

    Having sais that, yeah, the world could have, should have, would have, but it’s too late already and the next few generations are deeply fucked