• fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    • 2025: Search removed. Spend a decade crippling the function, then claim the usage data support getting rid of it!
    • 2027: Expiring updates. Juice those watch numbers with a new artificial scarcity measure. Marvel Bullshit 49 Theatrical Trailer, available for seven days only! Featuring AI Robin Williams and a Mr B_ast guest ad!
    • 2028: Web Environment Integrity inserted. Hand warmer sales crater as mobile viewers relish their new handset functionality.
  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I haven’t turned off ad-blocking in 20 years. That’s because I “don’t allow” companies to use my home and my computer as their place of business.

  • sugartits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll look forward to reading this yet again next week, alongside all the entitlement in the comments section that seem to think running YouTube is free and recommending trash alternatives which have less than 1% of YouTube’s content and don’t even work.

    See you next week!

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this fake? I thought the term is whitelisted not allowlisted

    • alianne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In recent years there’s been a shift from “white/black list” to “allow/block list” in an effort to avoid the stereotypes associated with those terms. I wouldn’t say it’s the new norm yet, but it’s slowly becoming more popular.

      • Throwaway@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, basically the demand for hate outstrips the supply, so they decided that whitelist/blacklist is racist. Its just a power trip, being able to change peoples vocab with nonsense.

        • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are a trillion dollar company, they can afford to give some slack on this issue that maybe affects 5% of their users

          • Throwaway@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Its honestly not a big deal, its just something to go rename for no good reason. At least for my job, it took about only a couple man-days to get every mention of blacklist/whitelist renamed and the code reviewed.

            The bigger deal for me was master branch to main. Broke every pipeline script we had, broke our backups, and it caused not one but two outages in production. I guess its our fault for not making the branch name maintainable, but its never come up before and will never come up again. I honestly think between all the work we put in to that change, we spent a man-year on that. Thats before the production outages. Devops sucks.

            At least I got paid to deal with it.

          • Polar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I remember when I tried setting up a server a couple decades ago and I didn’t understand what the difference between a white and black list were. Made no sense to me.

            Allow/block can’t be mistaken. It’s literally a better choice of words for many reasons.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            What makes no sense is the words “white” and “black” as referring to people. People are brown, all of them.

      • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I hate that.

        With flying they changed NOTAM from notices to airmen to notices to air missions or something.

        Calm tf down. Will they change Human to hupersons next? Man-made to huperson-made? GTFO here.

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If something so trivial upsets you so deeply in an attempt to make others feel more included, maybe you should look into yourself.

          You should probably take your advice and calm down.

          • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Talking with the people involved, at least in my experience, it is an unnecessary adjustment. Nobody “affected” gave a hoot.

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Okay, I have to ask: outside of training, did you ever say NOtice To AirMen? I haven’t. It’s always NOTAM for me. They were nice enough to keep the acronym the same.

      • hddsx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah like the master/slave becoming server/client?

        I still don’t like allow list though. Block list seems fine. Maybe access list?

        • alianne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Similar to that, yeah, although I think the master/slave thing started earlier. (It’s a bit more blatant, tbf.)

          I agree that allowlist doesn’t roll off the tongue quite as nicely, but as long as it makes it obvious what the word means, I’ll go with it.

        • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel the use of master/slave to talk about technological concepts took power away from the original conotations of the words and by not using them its actualy making their effect more negative but what would i know.

  • UntouchedWagons@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fortunately I haven’t gotten any warnings but my dad did last night. I cleared ublock’s cache and updated the lists. Hopefully it works.

    [Edit] Nope my dad is still getting warnings about ublock origin.

  • Hairy_MacBoon@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, I don’t ever see this problem. Using Brave and uBlock origin in Firefox. Maybe just update your filters once in a while?

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will happily either find an alternative frontend, or just stop watching youtube all together. It’s done nothing good to my life either way

  • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google kind of sucks.

    What was their last big success? Google maps? Pretty much everything they do lately is some combination of shitty or prematurely killed.

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Google more than just kind of sucks. Like you said they haven’t done shit in a long time outside of making the internet more hostile with shit like this and their planned chrome-based anti adblock (a LOT of browsers run on chromium which would bring the same shit, Mozilla4lyfe)

      Also, the google graveyard is just pathetic at this point. They truly can’t do shit outside of anti-user bullshit

    • Polar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ignoring everything after Google maps is ignorant as hell. I mean Google Photos is literally used by a massive percentage of iPhone users as well, because it’s so good.

        • Polar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They didn’t walk it back. Pixel 1 still has unlimited storage.

          You’re insufferable. Whatever fits your agenda.

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            They didn’t walk it back. Pixel 1 still has unlimited storage.

            And for some time, other devices did as well. And then they changed it. Would some other term than “walking back” describe “they offered a good deal to customers, and then changed it to a less good deal” better for you?

            Do you like work for Google or something? Probably not. The handful of people I’ve met who work there aren’t nearly this zealous about defending it.

            • Polar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              They never, ever, ever, advertised other devices as having lifetime unlimited uploads for original quality. Show me where they said that.

              They do still have unlimited, though. So not sure what you’re complaining about? Like I genuinely don’t. Both promises were kept.

              • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Are you hanging your entire argument on the word “lifetime”?

                From their announcement

                Starting June 1, 2021, any new photos and videos you upload will count toward the free 15 GB of storage that comes with every Google Account or the additional storage you’ve purchased as a Google One member. Your Google Account storage is shared across Drive, Gmail and Photos. This change also allows us to keep pace with the growing demand for storage. And, as always, we uphold our commitment to not use information in Google Photos for advertising purposes. We know this is a big shift and may come as a surprise, so we wanted to let you know well in advance and give you resources to make this easier.

                From this you can infer photos prior to June 21 2021 did not count against the storage. And now they do. Making the product worse for users.

                • Polar@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Except they don’t. Try reading the screenshots I sent you?

                  Maybe stop fucking pouting like an entitled brat and open your damn eyes and read for a change? Holy shit.

    • bitflag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Android? Google Photo? Google Pixel? Google Pay? Google Apps? Chrome? Chromebook? Google Drive? Chromecast? Android Auto?

      They launched a ton of successful stuff since Maps came out in 2005

        • lustrum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Does it? It’s a fantastic service that works really well, whether it’s worth the price or privacy is a slightly different conversation

            • papertowels@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah I have an immich instance myself, and do plan on relying more on that as I max out my Google drive size.

              The bigger issue I gave with that is remote backup still imposes a cost, and like you said you gotta know what you’re doing to safely expose that to the Internet.

              • fiddlestix@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                That is true. I only use mine locally, so it’s not a problem. Although you can remote access via Tailscale for safety. It’s quicker and easier than trying to set up remote proxies etc, about which I know nothing. Tailscale took 5 mins.

        • bitflag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I personally love it. Being able to search “Tom at the beach drinking a cocktail” and get all the relevant pictures is magic.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You got me! Android came after maps in 2008. So that’s not a great argument for recent development. Is pixel meaningfully different than Nexus? That would put it in 2010, or 2016 if you insist pixel is a big innovation.

        Chromebooks are also a 2010 project.

        Google pay I don’t think is a success? Didn’t they like relaunch it recently and shit it up by tying it to phone numbers instead of your Google account? https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2021/10/google-pays-disastrous-year-continues-promised-bank-account-feature-is-dead/ https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/01/google-pay-hopes-to-recover-from-brutal-2021-with-new-leadership/ . Also the original release is 2011. Quite some time ago. But technically newer than maps!

        Drive is 2012. Dang, got me. But that’s still more than 10 years old, so my actual point seems to stand.

        Chromecast is 2013, so maybe within this decade.

        Auto is 2015 but I know nothing about it.

        I guess I should’ve said “in the past 7 years” instead of exaggerating and saying since maps!

        • bitflag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But all “successes” are gonna be years old. You don’t turn something like Chromebook into an overnight success. It takes years for an ecosystem to grow, users to find use cases, software revisions to polish the product, word of mouth, etc.

          For comparison the Apple watch came out in 2015 and Airpods in 2016. What other successes has Apple had in the past 7 years? Maybe their AR thing will take off, but if it does it’s probably 5-10 years from becoming a mass market product.

      • NeuronautML@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Android is developed by a consortium of developers called The Open Handset Alliance under an open source license. It is most certainly not a Google product, any more than Linux is a Canonical product. As in, they help develop it but it’s not their product.

        • bitflag@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          That is really playing with words… Android (the OS people run on their phone) was originally developed by a company bought by Google, which then funded it, made the overwhelming number of contributions to it for 19 years, does the marketing, certification plus all the non-open source elements that make the experience what 99.99% of users get everyday when they use their phone.