The Writers Guild of America’s new contract tilts streamers toward shelving content, but there’s a solution emerging.

  • ampersandrew@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    So the solution is ad supported services, if I understood the takeaway of the article? Because that’s no solution I’m willing to participate in.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      you could mix the two concepts… ad-free subscription service and residuals/licensing based on viewership.

      it’s not like the subscription services don’t have the metrics to take a piece of the subscription money coming in, and divvy it up based on total views each title gets each month.

      • ampersandrew@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah, that would probably level everything out, but I’m guessing that these subscription services are trying to avoid becoming the open book that Hollywood is. If you’re visibly the 4th most successful streaming service, customers might start to bandwagon.

  • Unaware7013@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    There’s a reason I abandoned the mainstream video streaming platforms years ago and really only subscribe to smaller ones that make all their own content. Much better experience imo even though I don’t get normal shows that way

    Much happier these days on my ship for those.

  • HubertManne@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think many of them may think about how they want to go about things. They see the fragmentation is not working for them except for maybe the big names like netflix and disney. It looks to me like amazon wants to get more away from original shows and position themselves as the place that gets other streaming services content second somewhere down the line.

  • kosure@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like good government has a role in preventing this. Is access to the new Willow TV series of moral imperative? Perhaps not. But should Disney, or anyone else, be allowed to produce content for clicks with the express purpose of disintegrating it 8 weeks later? I think the audience, writers, cast, crew, and creative executives would all agree that’s a no. I think only the accountants would say yes to this question.

    This is the same reason that copyright exists, and why Disney has fought so hard against it all these years. Works of significant cultural value cannot be entrusted to the hands of a profit seeking cadre. And civil society has an important role in preventing that from happening. Obviously the 150 year, or whatever it is, copyright expiration is not going to save us here. But this is a very analogous fight. I think legislation has got a role to play in it.