(does not reflect my opinion, just thought it looked funny)

Less hostile when in context.

Taken from a YouTube channel called Not Just Bikes.

  • testgoatpleaseignore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was going to link a comic but it’s only available on installation and The Platform Formerly Known As Twitter so I’m not gonna

    Go internet

  • Knightfox@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ll say that so much of this is unnecessary or even BS. Ban loud cars because they’re annoying, that’s all that is necessary. Set a decibel limit and if you exceed it then you can be fined. Set time limits like when most people are sleeping so you can have loud cars at some more reasonable times and ban them when people aren’t expecting stupidly loud noises.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most cities already have noise ordinances. But as usual owning a car gives you situational immunity to the law.

      • Knightfox@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        This was the line of thought I had as well, it should be so easy to stop this problem as it stands

        • OddFed@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can say this about the whole topic of car centricity. It is easy to solve. It’s just not wanted.

    • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Points 1-9 are empirically proven effects of noise, none of them are BS. Point 10 is an arbitrary opinion.

      • Knightfox@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Points 1-9 being empirically proven is still a BS argument unless you’re also supporting banning all loud noises. Using it as a justification for banning loud cars when we are around loud sounds elsewhere.

  • Xusontha@ls.buckodr.ink
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    But what about that one dude who wants to go rrrrrRRRRRRRRRRRRR at three in the morning and wake up everyone in a five mile radius?

  • PatFusty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Anybody else remember the trucker convoy protestors? Good times.

    Imagine trying to ban trucks from the cities.

  • vreraan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    On vehicles modified for sporting purposes the silencers no longer work because the propagation of sound is different and therefore db-killers are applied or it is avoided to drive them around the city center or during off hours. Then there are people who purposely remove the silencer just to make noise and this also reduce factory performance, these deserve to have their license withdrawn because they take advantage of the fact that noisy vehicles occasionally exist.

  • spacesatan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I moved to an apartment adjacent to an intersection on a medium-high traffic stroad and it was the biggest mistake of my life. I have never been so stressed. I can barely even enjoy music now because half the time if I hear bass in a song I think its coming from outside and I get annoyed for a few seconds.

  • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cars are already subject to noise restrictions. So effectively loud cars are banned. There is just little enforcement for most of it.