Artificial intelligence is already advancing at a worrying pace. What if we don’t slam on the brakes? Experts explain what keeps them up at night

  • SpaceBar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Large Language Models are nothing but very advanced regurgitation machines. That’s the AI these articles are hand wringing about - not a real Artificial Intelligence.

    These articles remind me of the bitcoin articles we used to see.

    • nanoobot@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What ability do you think that they are currently missing that makes them ‘regurgitation machines’ rather than just limited and dumb but genuine early AI?

  • ShoePaste@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Shit i dunno, everyone dying the same instant doesnt sound so bad. Quick and painless is certainly better than the options most of us face ¯_(ツ)_/¯

  • orclev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    And monkeys could fly out of my ass. Before we start hand wringing about AI someone would probably need to actually invent one. We’re probably closer to actual room temperature fusion at this point than we are an actual general purpose AI.

    Instead of wasting time worrying about a thing that doesn’t even exist and probably won’t in any of our lifetimes, we should probably do something about the things actually killing us like global warming and unchecked corporate greed.

    • mrnotoriousman@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I absolutely hate this craze. Most of the questions I get about AI are just facepalming because everyone is feeding off each other with these absurd things that could hypothetically happen. Clearly because actually explaining it doesn’t generate clicks and controversy

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Clearly because actually explaining it doesn’t generate clicks and controversy

        Solving real problems is hard because if it wasn’t they would be solved already, but making up fake problems is really easy.

      • Vittelius@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There is this concept called “crityhype”. It’s a type of marketing mascarading as criticism. “Careful, AI might become too powerful” is exactly that

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of the folks worried about AI x-risk are also worried about climate, and pandemics, and lots of other things too. It’s not like there’s only one threat.

    • HumanPenguin@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      like global warming and unchecked corporate greed.

      And the unnecessary cruelty @[email protected] puts poor monkeys through.

      Come on man let the poor things out. No matter what they did to you. They don’t deserve that.

    • mookulator@wirebase.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Amen. The “AI” everyone is freaking out about is good at a narrow range of things, but either dumb as shit or completely incapable otherwise

  • Raphael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As long as AI doesn’t go around financing wars around the globe and sanctioning opposing or outright bombing them, I’m fine with it.