• cmbabul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It may not be capable yet, but in time you could easily feed an AI all of say, Scorseses filmography and then ask it to make you a movie with X plot in his style and it will spit one out. Probably won’t be great cinema but studio heads don’t care if people pay to see it

        • loz@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s exactly what I’ve been thinking. The Star Wars sequels feel like they were spat out by an AI, or a committee of geriatrics.

  • nymwit@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do it!

    That’s cool Fran Drescher is the SAG president. Didn’t know that. I did know she doesn’t really have “The Nanny” voice but I did read her quotes in that voice. Just sticks with you.

  • DonnieNarco@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was thinking about this earlier, and what will I watch for the foreseeable future if this happens…guess YouTube content will get a huge bump if there are no more TV shows or movies to watch.

    • yenahmik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The last strike brought us some really fantastic content, such as Dr Horribles Sing-a-long Blog and The Guild. I imagine we’ll see a resurgence of creator-driven projects that are directly supported by audiences.

      In today’s world with tools like Patreon available, I suspect writers and actors can invent income streams outside of the Hollywood studio complex.

      • nyar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The definitely not very problematic Dr Horrible. I look forward to what we get to consume then realize is fucked up in a year or two.