Two activists arrested after Rokeby Venus artwork targeted, as dozens of others held after blocking Whitehall

Just Stop Oil protesters have been arrested after smashing the glass covering a Diego Velázquez painting at the National Gallery in London, as police detained dozens of others who blocked Whitehall.

Two activists targeted the glass on the Rokeby Venus painting with safety hammers before they were arrested on suspicion of criminal damage.

The artwork, which was painted by Velázquez in the 1600s, was slashed by the suffragette Mary Richardson in 1914. One of those involved on Monday said: “Women did not get the vote by voting; it is time for deeds not words.”

The Metropolitan police said at least 40 activists who were “slow marching” in Whitehall were also detained and that the road was clear after traffic was stopped for a brief period

  • kralk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Drawing a direct line up the suffragettes is genius. History will prove them right

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Hardly anyone argues again their cause being right. I’m not sure history will show that their campaign did much else than promote the misguided view that environmentalists are arseholes

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        …a lot of people do argue against their cause, though, is the thing. We cannot wait for change to happen, we gotta force some hands.

        • DavidOwie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          This isn’t forcing anyone’s hand. It just makes environmentalists look like assholes. Sure, shitting your pants in the name of whatever movement is a statement, but it’s not likely it’s one the rest want to make nor is it gonna do any good.

      • Lols [they/them]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        people constantly argue against their cause being right, because their cause is working on fixing the problems as much as possible and governments are not doing that

  • brewbellyblueberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Aren’t these the same idiots who threw food at the paintilngs and people defended them with “well the paintings are covered with protective glass either way so they’re not doing any harm, just publicity for a good cause”? Like I’m all for protesting and especially old fashioned ways that do more harm than good, but these people are just assholes trying to destroy invaluable art which is never going to do anything positive for their cause and on top of it all is literally so misguided. No oil company or production or anything is gonna give a fuck about some old painting and this only gives assholes ammo to paint these kinds of movements unhinged. It’s like they’re paid actors to make it look bad.

    • Striker@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The planet is literally dying. A painting ain’t worth shit in the grand scheme of things. This has always been a popular tactic for protests the article mentioned the suffragettes doing the exact same thing to the exact same painting.

      • brewbellyblueberry@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I’m not arguing for the value of the paintings but the idiocy of the protest. If it worked for the suffragettes (where it is even fathom able that it might have some relevance to the protest, unlike here) good for them, but this is nothing like that. This just paints them as idiots and does very little less. A common tactic used by the whatever shitty thing that’s supposedly being protested is to make fools of the protesting party. Even though this is apparently just idiots making everybody in the movement look bad. Yay. Lotta good that does…

        If these idiotic stunts aren’t a smear campaign, these morons are doing their work for them.

  • nautilus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    Dudes be like nooo stop trying to hurt the nice paper and go protest somewhere else so we can more easily ignore you

    Putting the protection of art above what these people are protesting is both hilarious and also extremely depressing

    • Deceptichum@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      But this is very easy to ignore, a bougie art gallery?

      Go slash a ceos neck or something if you’re going to go to gaol anyway.

    • u/unhappy_grapefruit_2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Said “paper” has a shit ton of historical significance. art can define our culture alter our history and change our perception on things. Art like comedy or forms of media is also subjective what you may find rubbish another person may enjoy. And in my upmost opinion this isn’t protesting this is vandalism. I think it’s important that we must not forget history so we can learn from it and not repeat the mistakes of old. and a large part of not forgetting history is restoring and maintaining pieces of art such as this

    • brewbellyblueberry@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Great job comprehending what you’re reading.

      It’s a million times more depressing that the majority of environmentalist-minded people apparently see these publicity stunts as positive.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            We are talking about a painting from an artist in the court of a Spanish monarch from hundreds of years ago, a type of art that museums strive to maintain via expensive means. We are not talking about more ephemeral art that doesn’t get maintained, and is eventually lost to time anyway.

            Maintaining of art like this would absolutely be one of the first things to go. There is already often talks about defunding the arts even in peaceful times. Look at “went to an art school” being often thrown around as a joke about being useless even in decent times.

            • brewbellyblueberry@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              You can talk circles around justifying this idiocy, it’s not going to make this clout chasing vandalism stunt any more clever. If justifying some kind of funding is what you want to talk about you’re free to do so, funding has never been something that stops art from existing, but that discussion is absolutely irrelevant to this thing. Besides, “the arts are one of the first things to go” isn’t talking about this one piece, it’s very general and you know it.

  • Bri Guy @sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    lol not this shit again. what was the group of people that were slashing the tires of SUVs to “save the planet”?