• morgan423@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    193
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Most people I know are only wearing masks now if they catch colds and flus and don’t want to spread it when going out and in public.

    Which seems to me to be when you’d WANT your food service employee (whom you probably forced to work while sick) to wear one, so that they don’t spread it to the rest of your staff. But I guess I’m not a fast food company corporate executive, so what do I know?

    • EeeDawg101@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      98
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah it’s bizarre how they’re acting. As a customer, I’d feel better if the people preparing the food I’m consuming were wearing masks. It’s like they took the total opposite of wanting to appease their customers.

      • _finger_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        90
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not bizarre at all, it’s typical attitudes of conservative bull-headed contrarian trolls like always.

        • takeda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well it is bizarre from gastronomical industry point of view. They probably require wearing hair nets, but a snot on a burger is acceptable.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guarantee you they wouldn’t require hairnets if they didn’t have to by law. They have to pay for those hairnets.

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly. And this is no different than the way they behaved during the entirety of the lockdown anyway, so I don’t know why people are surprised that conservatives are still acting like conservatives have been acting for years.

    • TheAndrewBrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, if you are soulless and going to make them work when they’re sick anyway, why would you care if they infected the rest of the staff?

    • Shikadi@wirebase.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’d rather everyone be sick and customers think no one is sick then to have customers think someone is sick because they’re wearing a mask

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s probably it right there, the good old bury your head in the sand method.

    • NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Personally as a customer, I’d want them at home sick and getting better than in work at all in that condition.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know a single person who wears a mask as a political statement. Even during the pandemic, it wasn’t common to think that way, no matter what the propaganda of the time said. People who wore them did it out of courtesy for those around them. I don’t imagine that has changed.

      People who wear masks are usually wearing them because they don’t want to spread illness. Either they’re ill themselves or they have or know someone with an immunodeficiency that puts them at risk.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The vast majority of people here do not wear masks. My frickin mom, who has cancer and a heart condition, has even stopped wearing one when she has an issue and has to go to the MFin emergency room. WTF. I had COVID like 2.5 years ago so probably alpha based on the timing and it was a mild case but it WRECKED me. My only symptom was a really bad headache one day then a mild headache for about a week where it just felt like I needed more coffee, any caffeine addicts out there would know what I mean. But after I had the worst cognitive defects that I could barely finish a sentence, couldn’t remember common words, etc. It was awful. It didn’t get better after vaccination, which I got for the first time about 2 months after the infection. I’m much better now but still not how I was. I don’t want to get this again even after having had it and all available vaccines and I can’t fathom why anyone else who has had it wants it again. I can’t understand sick and old people who walk around bare faced. I can’t understand healthy people who want to risk it. Why, people? Even the cancer center no longer requires a mask. It’s nuts.

    • Hyggyldy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I was just thinking I’d rather all food workers wear masks regardless of whether or not they’re carrying something.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll say this, back when the founders were around in the 00’s, even with the Bible verses, they intentionally prioritized pay and food quality over growth. Then the kids took over the business. The kids are probably going kill what made that place special because they’re greedy and selfish.

      • TurboDiesel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds about right. Who was it? Carnegie? Rockefeller? that said it takes 3 generations to squander wealth.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Had no idea. Only eaten there twice before, once when no other options were available. It was terrible both times. It is so overhyped. Never wanted to eat there again, but the Bible verses thing adds to my decision. Pretty weird and creepy, honestly.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Technically it’s not the verse, it’s just something like “Matthew 12:9.” Still stupid and pointless. And definitely weird and creepy. It’s on the underside of the packaging where most people won’t look, which makes it weirder.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry, Jesus will save you from the crippling diarrhea you might get because we require workers to come in sick and don’t let them cover their mouths.

      And don’t worry, the dracula sneeze has been BANNED. Our employees let their snot spray proudly and free. No wicked vampire posturing at In-N-Out Burger.

  • Rottcodd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    See… this is the point at which the whole conservative covid reaction, to me, goes from just weird and unsettling to full-on bug-eyed insane. AND hypocritical.

    Their whole deal with masks and vaccines is that they should have the right to decide for themselves. I think they make dumbass decisions that cause entirely avoidable harm, but okay - I can grant at least some bare semblace of legitimacy to self-determination. I don’t vagree, but at least I can see their underlying logic.

    But banning masks? What the actual fuck? What possible difference can it make in their lives that somebody else is wearing a mask? And what happened to their whole self-determination thing? Do they sincerely believe that nobody should be able to tell them whether or not they have to wear a madk and that they should be able to tell other people whether or not they can? How does that even work inside their brains? What possible logic leads to “I don’t have to do what you say but you DO have to do what I say”?

    Seriously, are they literally insane? I sincerely can’t think of any other explanation. It’s not just people acting in some way other than my preference, but people acting in a way that’s blitheringly irrational, even by their own principles.

    I suspect that when future historians write about this era, they’re going to call it something like The Idiot Age, because to them it will be marked by people inexplicably doing obviously and painfully stupid and irrational things.

    • Unaware7013@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Their whole deal with masks and vaccines is that they should have the right to decide for themselves.

      Close, that’s what they said they believe. Anyone watching them actually behave during the pandemic knew that anyone wearing a mask was liable to be attacked by these brainless psychos ranting about the “kung flu” or whatever other racist name they had for it merely for wearing a mask in their presence.

      • gorillakitty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        I wasn’t directly attacked but my friend and I had the same experience in our 60% Trump area.

        We weren’t together when each incident happened, but they’re so similar I’ll describe them together.

        We were just at the checkout: me at a convenience store; my friend at a major grocery store chain.

        So, we couldn’t reasonably move away. We had to stand there to pay for our purchases.

        An old man encroached my space; an old woman encroached my friend’s space. We both politely asked them to step back for social distancing, and they refused.

        I wish I had my friend’s ability to think and speak on his feet. After he checked out, he told the old lady “I asked for you to do something, that cost you nothing. All you had to do was take a few steps back. I hope in the future, if you ask someone the same, they treat you like you did to me.”

        As for me? Even though I just said my request and didn’t respond further, the guy was a huge jerk who tailgated me for several miles in his huge pickup truck. Like headlights in my mirror tailgating… during the day.

        Who tf cares that much? Honestly… just take a few steps back. Doesn’t cost you anything, like my friend said.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          As for me? Even though I just said my request and didn’t respond further, the guy was a huge jerk who tailgated me for several miles in his huge pickup truck. Like headlights in my mirror tailgating… during the day.

          And then they wonder why people don’t want them on lemmy.

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Dealt with that shit a lot. Thankfully the old “My grandma has cancer and I don’t want to be the one to kill her” line usually worked.

      • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        They don’t believe anything. They think what they’re told to think. They check Fox News all day every day to make sure what they’re supposed to think hasn’t changed but they have no beliefs. And they’re willing to go along with literally anything as long as it doesn’t require critical thinking. It’s terrifying and sad.

    • TheSaneWriter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They were lying. They said they supported self-determination to throw out the existing laws, and with those laws gone they passed laws that enforced their morals, which was the ultimate end goal.

    • ProfessorZhu@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are lying, plain and simple. From pot, to interracial marriages they have always been the party that’s the most obsessed with controlling people’s personal lives. Everytime we act surprised about the “hypocrisy” were playing into their propaganda. They want to build Gilead and will tell people what ever gets them closer to their white nationalist goals.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not a new thing, it’s the slave master’s concept of rights: “It is my right to to take away other people’s rights.”

    • dudebro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, businesses like these want their employees to look the same.

      Having some wear masks and some not is jarring for the pearl-clutchers of the world.

      To be honest, if any of you put a little bit of thought into this, you’d come up with some pretty rational conclusions.

      Whether you agree with the policy or not is up to you. But trying to argue they’re ‘literally insane’ is just hyperbole to cover up your lack of understanding and insight into the situation.

      • Vamanos@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So that is a reasonable take? They don’t want people to wear masks because they’ll look different? That’s a lot of justification for an absurd corporate mandate.

          • Vamanos@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Being in the workforce for 40 years now I do understand how corporations feel.

            Masks help in general. And if an employee who has a cold wants to wear a mask that’s a net benefit for customers and society.

            Maybe I have more faith in the American people to NOT FREAK the fuck out if they walk into somewhere that has a masked worker.

            Probably unreasonable. Ideas of personal choice - until it comes to something where people disagree. Then personal choice gets removed.

            • dudebro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              These businesses care a lot about presentation.

              While it would be nice if people viewed wearing masks in a restaurant as cleaner and more-inviting, that’s just not the case.

              People have evolved to become suspicious of those who cover their faces.

              • Vamanos@lemmy.fmhy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                I guess it really says something about those people who view masks as an attack on themselves based on your statements

                • dudebro@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t think viewing someone as suspicious is the same as them attacking you.

      • EquipLordBritish@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they actually cared about safety and consistency, they would make mask wearing required for everyone. But they don’t care about consistency because they argued at first that everyone should have their own choice, and they don’t care about safety because they are now banning usage of PPE. The article states that In-In-Out’s statement was about being able to see people’s faces, not uniform consistency. The article also mentions a specific location that was shut down due to vaccine mandate violations, which corporate appears to have supported, which has nothing to do with uniform consistency and everything to do with some very specific political nonsense. Your argument really doesn’t hold water, and it should be a serious offense to prevent a worker from using safety equipment. Especially safety equipment that has a good chance of keeping them from having to use any sick days (do they even get sick days?).

  • 11181514@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Also of note is the fact that the memo is addressed to employees in Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Texas, and Utah. That leaves two states where In-N-Out operates — California and Oregon — that are apparently exempt from the mandate.

    So does In n Out not care about customer service in California and Oregon? Or do they not care about safety in other states?

    Just kidding. I know they don’t care about either. Luckily there’s a restaurant near me that has basically copied their recipes so I don’t have to worry about contributing to some regressive idiots.

    • yumpsuit@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not a lawyer, but they’d be sticking their head into the teeth of California’s COVID-19 Prevention Non-Emergency Regulations. This batch took effect in February 2023 and are authorized for the next two years. Don’t know about Oregon.

      From the Cal/OSHA Title 8 regulations:

      §3205. COVID-19 Prevention. (f) Face coverings. (4) No employer shall prevent any employee from wearing a face covering, including a respirator, when not required by this section, unless it would create a safety hazard.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The source for this is a tweet from someone unaffiliated with In-N-Out.

    (ie, it’s probably false)

    Still, In-N-Out sucks and you can do better.

    • solstice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Still, In-N-Out sucks and you can do better

      I would like to know more

      Edit: ok so far in the comments we got a fictional burger joint from a 90’s nickelodeon sketch, whataburger because margot robbie may or may not have endorsed it and she’s hot so she must know a lot about fast food hamburgers, and five guys which everyone knows is the superior sandwich but twice as expensive. Got it. I think I’ll hit In’n’out tonight.

        • Ternpike@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A regular cheeseburger and fries at 5 guys is $16 + tax. A double double and fries at In n Out is $7 + tax

          • Cabrio@lemmy.world
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Mmm, nothing beats the price of exploitation, you can taste the desperation in the cheese.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Margot Robbie endorses Whataburger:

        Whataburgertm, Because It’s Right There. (Go watch Vengeance too.)

        Only if they bring back the A1 Thick & Hearty Burger though. A heart attack never tasted so good.

    • girlfreddy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      What proof do you have it’s probably false? The article clearly has a big “if” in the last paragraph concerning the validity of the leaked memo.

      If you have no facts to back your opinion, it’s worth far less than this article.

  • Thekingoflorda@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hey, the title of your post and the title of the article don’t match. This breaks rule 4, could you maybe change the title?

    • Cabrio@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you reconcile rule 4 with blatantly false and disingenuous titles on articles that don’t match their own content?

  • takeda@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s really messed up. It doesn’t affect my experience as a customer and frankly I’d anything, it makes things better, because mask also blocks any droplets. So if employee even gets a cold I’m less likely to catch it too.
    It should be treated like wearing a hair net.

    If employee wants to wear it, it is hard for me do see any downside by letting them.

        • takeda@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends what you look for in the budger. If you like a big portion, a lot of meat, then In n Out is not for you.

          But a lot of people like burger created that way.

    • GizmoLion@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right, be consistent and ban hairnets because employees wearing them reminds customers that their hair falls out. It’s all about consistency! Lol

      Gloves? Good as gone! How dare you insinuate that hands are unsanitary? Customers have those too, that’s just rude!

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They might as well have said they just banned hairnets or revoked any “Employees must wash hands” policies.

    Sorry, In-N-Out. I love your burgers, but I can’t make a responsible decision to eat at your restaurants if you’re proactively banning basic hygiene measures from being practiced in your stores. This posturing is little more than an empty platitude based on a backwards understanding of basic health and hygiene, and until they can understand that, they won’t have my business anymore.

    • Perrin42@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love In-N-Out, and miss their Animal-style burgers and fries, but this right here is the reason I haven’t gone to one since the pandemic. If they are politicizing this basic act of public health and hygiene, as they did with their refusal to enforce mask mandates while thousands of people were dying every day, then what other hygiene practices are they ignoring?

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the people that like to complain the most about their freedoms being taken away seem more than happy to restrict the freedom of others.

  • holycrap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    So… employees with congestion should just leave their nose bare and potentially get snot on their burgers?

    • Vamanos@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes. It is evident that banning masks is more important when corporations feelings get hurt at the existence of said masks.

      So remember:

      Personal choice here is not ok Virtue signaling is ok - as long as you are signaling virtues that agree with conservative feelings Feelings over facts

      Kind of crazy how those three talking points are argued ad nauseam in the other direction. Yet seem to be the only supporting reasons here. Hmm. I wish there were a phrase that describes saying one thing and doing another.