Nikki Haley vows to abolish anonymous social media accounts: ‘It’s a national security threat’::WPDE covers news, sports, weather, and local events in and around the Grand Strand, Pee Dee, and the Border Belt.

    • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      But that’s different you see. Because money is speech and therefore needs to be protected, including by allowing total anonymity of donors. Whereas we’re talking about online accounts, where people of course never engage in speech or express ideas. Hey, wait a second that can’t be right. Hmmm, okay maybe it’s because she’s saying it’s a security risk, because you don’t know if they’re a foreign national spreading propaganda online. This is totally different from political donations, which of course have never been bribes from foreign powers masked by anonymity… Hey wait! She got us again. Almost like she’s some kind of shill who wipes her butt with the constitution while trying to create a crony supported facist state. No that can’t be.

      But yeah, according to Republicans, money is speech, but speech is not speech. I’m expecting their next campaign platform to be 2+2=5.

  • BingoBangoBongo@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    Republicans really hate privacy don’t they. In 20 years theyre gonna ban bathroom doors so they can make sure the “right” people are in the “right” bathrooms.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      We really aren’t that far removed from codified segregation. I have parents, who grew up in the NE US, not even in the South, and they remember living with segregation. Separate bathrooms, separate water fountains, different entrances (if people of color were allowed in the establishment at all), etc etc

      And they’re really not that old.

  • meridian@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    I agree with Nimarata Hailey, everyone should use their real names in social media and everywhere

      • Eylrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Hey, you never know, maybe their real name is Meridian Longitude. I’ve never heard of Longitude as a last name but I wouldn’t put it past some parents to name their kid Meridian.

        • meridian@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          lol that was sarcasm. I’m not putting my real name on lemmy but I do think it’s funny she doesn’t use her real name either because her maga supporters would go nuts

    • Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I looked it up, and it’s actually spelled Nimrata. Which is funny, because it sounds like it would be a romantic language’s feminine form of nimrod.

      • prole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That could be close to the actual etymology. I believe “Nimrod” is the name of a person in the Bible.

        • _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Nimrod is a biblical figure mentioned in the Book of Genesis and Books of Chronicles. The son of Cush and therefore a great-grandson of Noah, Nimrod was described as a king in the land of Shinar. The Bible states that he was “a mighty hunter before the Lord [and]… began to be mighty in the earth”.

          Some funny trivia with “might hunter”: Bugs Bunny called Elmer Fudd nimrod, saying something like “nice shot, nimrod!” – the insult was that Elmer was a bad hunter. But the obscure reference was lost on most people, much less a child audience (myself included), and so nimrod became a generic insult akin to “idiot” or "imbecile.

  • N0body@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Such a move would lead to an increase in “civility,” Haley believes. “When they know their pastor, their family members can see it, it’s going to help our kids and it’s going to help our country," she said.

    That’s what everyone said about posting next to your real name on Facebook. How did that turn out?

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      their pastor

      Aren’t they obliged to confess their sins to those anyway? Not that having that obligation stopped many from doing bad things anyway.

      • ggBarabajagal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        A pastor usually leads a Protestant church. Catholic churches are led by priests.

        Confession of sins to (God though) a priest is a rite in the Catholic church, but not in Protestant churches. Protestant churches often encourage members to ask forgiveness for their sins directly to God through prayer.

        There are more Catholics than protestants in the world, but there are more protestants than Catholics in the U.S. The type of Christianity most often associated with socially conservative Republican/MAGA primary voters is Protestant “evangelical” Christianity.

        Evangelicals are a hardcore subset of Protestants who take the Bible literally. They’re sometimes called “Born-again Christians” because of their belief in the importance of personal conversion. That is, you’re not really a real Christian until, as an autonomous adult, you willingly choose to surrender yourself, mind body and soul, and devote your life to (your pastor’s teachings about) the teachings of Jesus.

        Anyway, now I’ve done an eight-hours-later four-paragraph TED-talk riff on what is otherwise quite a fine and clever comment. I mean no offense and hope none is taken. I mostly just wanted to note that when Nikki Haley talks about “pastors,” she isn’t talking to Catholics; she’s talking directly to the GOP evangelical voter base.

        • Akasazh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Cheers for the insight, I didn’t pick up on that difference, thought I would’ve known in my own vernacular.

          I always admire the tenacity for a detailed in depth explanation, it bellies a passion for sharing knowledge.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Well she’s right. But I don’t think anyone has an obligation to be “civil”. Posting anonymously is exactly what allows me to be honest without fear of backlash from family and friends. For better or worse.

  • arc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    The dumb part is this vow doesn’t even make sense on the face of it to protect national security.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Every political donation should be verified by their name. It’s a national security threat,” she said. “When you do that, all of a sudden people have to stand by what they say and it gets rid of the Russian bots, the Iranian bots and the Chinese bots.”

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    So how is she going to make them non-anonymous in a way that businesses can properly verify identity? Does every single social media site need to have its own ID analysis system for every state-ID? I mean that seems like it would be ridiculously hard.

    For that to be practical, they’d need something nation-wide, and probably digital.

    So, does she want to suggest to her fanbase a national digital ID? How would htat go?

    • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      In some countries this would be dead simple; look at the nordics, where there are government supported, nationwide systems that verifies identity (you have to physically show up with your passport to collect your set up log in details).

      I’d be quite happy if social media offered a way to link your identity in this way, but it’s quite a stretch to mandate it.

    • Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      There was a petition for the UK Parliament to implement what this politician wants by requiring verification for accounts (Piers Morgan was endorsing it iirc), and I believe a petition to not implement it under the pretense of it harming transgender individuals (e.g. deadnaming, having to come out to a stranger for verification).

      Parliament did respond saying such legislation would stifle the freedom of expression, which is true, but it doesn’t matter when the UK has other legislation doing the same thing.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ok as a trans person yeah we were my first thought, but my immediate second was abuse victims. Making cyberstalking easier will get people hurt, though from what I’ve seen of the far right, for some of them that’s the point.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    How are you going to disable anonymous accounts? You can always be anonymous if you want, meaning that this ends, AGAIN, with normies not having anonymous access and nerds and criminals still having anonymous access

  • Treczoks@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Can’t we just abolish this Nikki Haley instead? Whoever she thinks she is.