• RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because then you wouldn’t get the people who rarely play to throw money in.

      The bigger jackpots incentivize those who don’t play for the “pennies” at less than 500 million. They actually reduced the odds of winning a few years ago for this exact reason.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Euro millions has a €240M cap at which the jackpot is divided up in to the lower tier prizes if there is still no winner. The UK national lottery has a cap on roll overs at 5 where the top prize will roll down to the lower tiers if no winner remains.

    • Justagamer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you want to be depressed, look at what happened to most lottery winner’s lives. Or an average NFL player. Or anyone gets a huge cash windfall.

      The best situations are gradual increases in wealth

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I play it. I know that the odds make me more likely to die in the time it would take me to claim the prize than to actually win, but someone has to win it and the lotteries in Europe and the UK give a lot of money to good causes.

    • ji17br@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Funny you say that. There’s about 300 million possible numbers so at $2 per ticket you only need to win over $600 million for the lottery to be plus EV. Factor in 37% tax (which is what Google says is the average rate, but may be different depending on state) you “only” need a jackpot of about 950 million to profit.

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The new jackpot for Wednesday’s drawing would be the third highest in U.S. history and will keep growing until someone wins. Ticket buyers have a chance at $1 billion paid out in yearly increments or a $516.8 million one-time lump sum before taxes.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Always take the lump sum. Pay off your debts then stick it into reliable investments and live off the income from it.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        With a 500m lump sum, you could also take a 100k to just blow on whatever you want with basically 0 impact. You definitely need to limit though l.

        • JackbyDev@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve thought about it a lot. Blowing any money is going to be dangerous because you’re risking getting addicted to that ever increasing spending.

          I sit here and say that but probably would blow through a lot lol.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You need to blow some, more a a psychological reward than anything. The problem is definitely not increasing your standard of living to unsustainable levels, it’s not mega yacht money, but you could have a nice boat.

    • anolemmi@lemmi.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey that $3 buys me the ability to daydream about my life as a multimillionaire for a couple days, before I crash back to reality slightly less satisfied than before!