Response from Martin Woodward, GitHub’s VP of Developer Relations:

Sorry for the inconvenience @koepnick - while searching across all repos has required being logged in for a long time, when we enhanced the search capabilities earlier in the 2023 we had to extend this to repos as well (see https://github.blog/changelog/2023-06-07-code-search-now-requires-login/).

This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure this only applies to non-indexed repos right?
    indexing is a very expensive process and usually takes 5-10 minutes for repos with 10k+ lines, and letting non-registered users start it is not the best idea in the first place

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is a betrayal to the developers who put our projects up there. We wanted everything to be freely accessible, and of course this is just another step in enshittification of the service. Remember that many of us have small projects with few viewers, and we know that the extra burden on the server side isn’t even measurable. Yet our work is less accessible.

      • andreluis034@lm.put.tf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The code is still accessible, you just can’t use the code search function in the web, which normal git doesn’t have anyway.

    • btp@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it kind of flies in the face of what Open Source Software should be. They’re walling off code behind accounts in the Microsoft ecosystem.

      • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re not walling off any code. They’re restricting use of their server-side search resources. Other repository hosting services don’t have code search at all.

      • [email protected]@lemmy.federate.cc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s kind of a slippery slope; but I don’t think the search itself being login walled is apocalyptic. As long as anonymous users can clone the repositories and browse the code, I can kind of understand why they don’t want to pay to run an elastic search cluster for bots’ benefit. Presumably in-repo search could be done locally by scrapers’ hardware.

        But if it turns into “login to view this repository” then GitHub will have turned evil.

  • jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is primarily to ensure we can support the load for developers on GitHub and help protect the servers from being overwhelmed by anonymous requests from bots etc.

    So, Azure’s bot protection is crap. Good to know.

    • satan@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      People who haven’t hosted anything bigger than a two digit daily visitors tells Microsoft how bad their bots protection is.

    • detalferous@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Google can accommodate billions of searches globally on pages it doesn’t control

      Microsoft can’t index a tiny fraction of that number, even for it’s own users.

      What a black eye for Microsoft engineering.

      • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        TBF going by load times, GitHub search was perpetually on the brink of collapse since well before the Microsoft acquisition. I daren’t imagine what the indexes look like.

  • fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This has been around for a while. It may be so they can track and throttle LLMs hovering up public code repos.

    Either way, it’s a meh. Not sure why anyone would want to clutch their pearls over this. For those who need it, self-hosted gitlab is available.

  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Microsoft is terrible. Remember they also require you to use a Microsoft account for Minecraft now. Fuck this company so much

    • chameleon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they’re also deleting/deleted all classic Minecraft accounts from before that. They invented an incredibly weird and needlessly obtuse process to extend the migration deadline by 3 months (true final deadline is now mid December 2023), but that’s seemingly it. Everyone not paying too much attention to their email just gets $30 worth of game deleted because of a completely arbitrary decision.

      • BlueBockser@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Anyone without access to their old email also loses their account. I don’t remember which email address I used with my account back in the day (it’s at least ten years old), and since I bought my key from a reseller, I don’t have a receipt. Microsofts response was basically “not our problem, guess you’ll have to pay us again ¯\_(ツ)_/¯”

          • can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well that’s some bs. I haven’t played in a while but the principle of it still bothers me. Especially since I’d have never known if not for reading this thread.