• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well that’s only fair.

    It already made it worse for non-adblock users.

  • Cagi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Remember when every billionaire apologist was telling us how no one would do shit like this when net neutrality was being gutted?

    • yiliu@informis.land
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      This has nothing to do with net neutrality. Google is not an ISP. With or without net neutrality, Google could fuck with YouTube users.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Technically false. Google is an ISP. But they aren’t using their position as an ISP to slow down traffic or fast track other traffic in this instance so no it has nothing to do with net neutrality.

  • RT Redréovič@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is a good time to make aware about an amazing privacy-centric & user-friendly alternative - Peertube. It is not a big network as of now but the benefits it provides over YouTube are large - it is a part of the fediverse. Of course, only through increasing participation will the network become bigger.

    If you still wish to use YouTube, you can try third party front ends like Invidious or Piped on the browser; NewPipe(Also is a front end for Soundcloud, media.ccc.de, Peertube & Bandcamp) or LibreTube on Android.

    If you only browse YT Music, you can try HyperPipe in the browser. There are many apps for it available on F-Droid, an alternative app store for Android. My personal pick is ViMusic.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Peertube is a great platform. And it has its uses. But it will never compete with YouTube - YouTube’s business model actively incentivises and pays people to post media to their platform.

      Peertube is more likely to be to be the opposite - donation run, and given videos are exponentially more expensive to host, it’s highly unlikely that creators will receive any compensation for their work. In fact it’s more likely theyl be in the list of people donating to the platform (or they’ll own the platform outright)

      While this might be fine if a creator makes the majority of its money elsewhere, via patreon or sponsors or whatever, it’s not going to work out for any aspiring or up and coming YouTube who has yet to become big enough to start diversifying their income base.

    • megrania@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I feel like people mistake YouTube for a video hosting solution.

      But that’s not the point.

      • YouTube a huge archive of content that accumulated over the past 17 years.
      • YouTube is a content suggestion machine. Discoverability is a key aspect.
      • YouTube sets an incentive by allowing people to monetize their content.

      So, if the only thing you’re looking for is a video hosting solution, then, yes, PeerTube might be an alternative. In the same way uploading videos to your own webspace would be, and Vimeo also still exists.

      But for all the other stuff, YT is, unfortunately, unmatched, and probably will be for a while …

  • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    However bad they may make it, it can’t possibly be worse than it is for non-adblock users.

    But hey, if they want to torpedo their own services, have at it. It’s not like they have a reputation for it or anything…

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      About a week ago YouTube rolled out a new interface for ads. I cannot skip 90% of ads now. Many are around a minute in length. Always 2 ads at the beginning of every video, even if it’s only 10 seconds in length. Always 2 ads at the end of every video.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t know why they think this change is going to get anyone to switch.

    5 seconds of nothing is still way better than a minute-long ad

    • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They want to sell their Premium subscription. They want you to compare 5 seconds of nothing versus “0” seconds of nothing. That being said, I think uBlock Origin with up-to-date filter lists completely eliminated this delay for me.

      • Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        At work, we can’t log into personal accounts. And my job isn’t going to buy YouTube premium. So now any video tutorials on YouTube is getting impossible to watch.

        This has now triggered a bunch of lazy developers into action in my entire company. Even our internal newsletters are explaining how to use adblock.

    • LWD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Mozilla isn’t exactly making their browser better, either. Unless buying a data harvesting company and using it to push more ads counts as making it better.

      Edit: I would love to see replies from people who support Mozilla doing this, rather than just downvotes.

        • LWD@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          True, but if you use that excuse, you’ve given Mozilla a blank check to continue worsening their browser!

          A metaphorical blank check. Obviously Google is the one signing the physical one to Mozilla.

          • Ashley Graves@lm.possum.city
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            even in the event that it does get worse I can just downgrade or even fork it myself

            one of the many benefits of open-source software

            • LWD@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Google’s Chromium is open source too… Why don’t you just downgrade or fork that yourself?

              Or, perhaps, a large company that monolithically accepts changes to a product has a lot of control, even if you can download the source code

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, however “worse” it is for adblock users, it can’t compare to how awful the ads are.

    • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It was some low effort attempt talking about “code that I do not like running on my PC” or something like that, words like “malware” were thrown around. Basically if detecting adblocks is illegal so should be any JavaScript code.

        • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          IIRC it was one lower court case in Germany… That’s so many asterisk attached as to be meaningless, even if that judgement isn’t struck down or amended (unlikely), that still only applies to Germany (or was it one state within Germany?).

          The way the EU works is that it mandates each sovereign country to implement the mandate into their national laws, so jurisprudence in Germany doesn’t mean anything at all anywhere else.

  • shirro@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Long time family premium user (household of parents and kids). Anything Youtube do to preserve their revenue within reason doesn’t bother me too much as long as they don’t reduce the split with quality creators. If they were successful with all this bullshit perhaps they wouldn’t have needed to notify me that subs are almost doubling next year. My guess is all they are doing is fucking things up for everyone. It is only going to get worse if their premium subscription base reduces. They should be pricing premium as an alternative to ad-blockers but instead they are pushing people including premium subscribers towards ad-blockers.

    I already have ad-blockers and apps for circumventing youtube ads. Not using them in favour of a fairly priced (to me) subscription was a choice but sadly one Google seems to be discouraging.

  • Toes♀@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    My biggest problem with the ads is that it’s louder than the thing I’m watching, oftentimes a lot.

    They are sometimes an hour long and I gotta press the skip ad button with my nose cause it’ll take me ten minutes or more to clean up.

    I have no love for the automatic gadgets where you can speak your commands. They get suggested by my coworkers quite a bit.

    They want too much for what is ultimately hours of people playing chess.

    (⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

    • Nix@merv.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Theyre also blatant scams. Whenever I accidentally open youtube on my phone when clicking a link the ad is literally claims of free money using ai voices of celebrities, “cures” for blindness that are selling watered down bleach, and other scams

      • Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah any time I scroll through YT Shorts (Revanced Doesn’t block those ads rn) 99+% of the ads are just the “This new government program gives everyone $6400/month trust this bad AI voice of Steve Harvey.” scams.

  • Kakaofruchttafel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I mean they’ve also consistently been making YouTube worse for everyone not using Adblock, so it’s only fair.

  • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    WHAT?! I didn’t believe it for a second when the whole planet immediately noticed at the same time!

    But then again, they DID admit it. Which means they have nothing to hide! And that’s transparent, and bold. We should reward companies for doing the right thing. Not only criticize them when they didn’t do wrong!

    Tinkle Fingerent!