• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nickel 63 has a half life of 100 years. So that means you have safely store these things for 500 years after using them. Yeah, sounds totally fine.

    • CucumberFetish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Too many of those floating around. Another gem I recently stumbled upon was power consumption of 4.7 watts per watt.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Once they have a one watt version, this would be good for trickle charging when you are not using the device, such as when you’re sleeping. But you would definitely need a lithium battery alongside it for normal use.

  • Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Give us this day thy daily revolutionary battery invented tech journalism hype bullshit

    • Moira_Mayhem@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      The innovation isn’t the product, it is the manufacturing. The cells in pacemakers had the housing of the pacemaker to protect from puncture.

      These devices are meant to go in portable electronics so puncture safety is far more critical.

      Honestly radioactive copper as a low volt lifetime battery is an interesting idea. It won’t live power a phone but it could charge it while inactive.

      Good for camping where solar isn’t viable.