• troutsushi@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    On the flip side, all threat of consequences works as a deterrent only when there’s the expectation to be caught and punished.

    By always catching but never handing out punishment to kids violating rules, you only teach them that consequences are inconsequential.

    • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      To clarify, I wasn’t trying to argue there shouldn’t be consequences, just that depending on severity it must be proportional.

      I want to compare it to the US justice system where, from an outsiders perspective, many are judged unnecessarily harsh. This makes it harder for people to “come back” after release and creates a societal loss.

      I’ll end it there because I cba to write more but, eh, just my thoughts. Some nuance is lost in translation too.

      • troutsushi@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Your thoughts are valid and I agree – in principle.

        The proportionate punishment does, however, depend on the severity of the violation. In an academic context, there are few things as severe as blatant plagiarism. Being caught in not just cheating but brazenly copy-pasting other people’s work can imho be appropriately punished with expulsion, be it in the US or elsewhere.

        • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yes, the punishment for plagiarism is kinda standardised. I feel like maybe, at first strike there should be a warning + redo the assignment. But the specifics would be a whole new never-ending discussion

          I’ve always only heard it’s punishable directly with explosion. Maybe it’s for there for a reason, or is it a remnant of the past?