• gnuplusmatt@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The suit details that Carano was required by Disney to meet with a representative from the LGBTQ+ group Glaad after online behaviour that was seen as anti-trans, yet she refused. She was then asked to meet with a group of LGBTQ+ Disney employees but again refused and was fired soon after.

    Interesting - I’d have thought someone who clearly has a history of using steroids would be more empathetic to those who’s gender doesn’t match their outward appearance

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know what part about this story I hate more; she was good in the role and entertaining but refused to even even meet with LGBT individuals.

      Or the fact that the mouse was entirely justified in their actions here after giving her two very easy outs to save her job. If the mouse looks good next to you during a conflict, you definitely fucked up.

      Also stinkrat needs to.go to Mars already and either have his rocket explode or get run over by a smart far.

      • Arcane_Trixster@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not about to be lectured by a bunch SJW activists, even if I generally agree with them. I can’t blame her there, it sounds unbearable.

        But she knew what the deal was when she skipped those meetings, and you can’t come back with a law suit saying you were unfairly fired. She chose to not play the game, but still wants the disney paychecks.

        • Rakonat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t know what you’re expecting to accomplish here. She spouted hateful things about a group of marginalized people, told that as a public figure she was not allowed to do that while on Disney payroll, and given an opportunity to save her job. She was being asked to sit down in a private meeting with individuals who identify as LBGT, not being forced to do PR work like hosting a fundraiser or having alterations to her contract obligating her to do screen work that she wasn’t interested in.

          I would get fired from my job for making social media posts like she did, and there is absolutely no way my employers would be willing to say everything was forgiven if I just sat down in a meeting or had lunch with a handful of people I had indirectly insulted. She wasn’t being treated unfairly or being made to change her position on a subject publicly, she was being asked to stop spreading hate speech.

        • Zorg@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Typically that’s not what it is at all, but that is how the fashy media paints it.

          The purpose of those kinds of meetings, is for shitty people to be placed faced to face with one or more LGBT persons (or in other situations a black person, or a Muslim or whatnot). And maybe, just maybe, the shitty person can learn, than e.g. someone gay or trans; while slightly different, largely they are just people.

        • Omega@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean, it was either get lectured by the people you have been disparaging or get fired. If I had to go to a meeting because I didn’t realize something I said was hurtful, I’d just be happy to still have a job.

          The problem was treating her like she’s not just hateful.

          • Cenzorrll@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            The problem was treating her like she’s not just hateful.

            They gave her the choice to play the game and pretend she’s not hateful, or just be hateful. She chose the latter.

        • cygon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Ah, “SJW”, “CRT”, “Woke” etc. - words that right wing opinion manipulation campaigns load with anything unpopular amongst their base so they can unite in hate against the “other” group, even if no two people agree on who belongs in it and why.

        • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hard downvote because calling people sjw betrays the fact that you don’t undertand that people just wants to live and let live.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh look, another Peter Thiel vs. Gawker situation. Except Disney has much better lawyers than Gawker did.

    Let’s see who blinks first. I’m guessing it won’t be Disney.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also there’s the fact that gawker did publish revenge porn. This is an actress being fired for saying something extremely insensitive

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is not the same at all. Disney did not out anything private about her or Musk. They also did not publish revenge porn of her. She is a public transphobe and a Holocaust denier.

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      And also that the Hulkster actually had a case. Gawker repeatedly refused to comply with court orders to take Hulk’s tuna can video down.

      This is just a wanna-be martyr who got fired because she couldn’t keep her goddamn mouth shut about her stupid conspiracy theories and ride the Mouse’s cash train. But hey, watching Muskie burn even more money is always entertaining, so fucking let it rip.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I get that Hulk had a case, but he couldn’t have afforded to bring it himself. So Peter Thiel, who has endless money and an axe to grind with Gawker for outing him, funded it.

        Which is sort of similar here, except that Musk’s axe to grind is because Disney stopped giving Twitter money and is “woke,” so it’s even more petty.

        It was more about who is funding the case than whether the case has merit.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I performed at Disney World in my high school chorus and my contract had conduct clauses.

      It also gave them the right to use my image and voice “in perpetuity and throughout the universe.”

      • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        universe

        “Uh, I’m gonna need you to specify this universe, or all possible universes - yeah in writing - no, I haven’t been to any other universes but jeeze, “through-out” isn’t exactly explicit and - hello? hello?”

      • No_Eponym@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Oh man, how many images of high schoolers etc. does Disney have the license for? That’s an AI training treasure trove right there.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          This was back in the 90s so they probably weren’t thinking about it, but I’m sure there are some grainy digital photos of me somewhere they’d use.

          As for the how many of them: We performed at their Christmas Extravaganza or whatever, and there were probably 200 kids in the chorus. We only performed twice on one day, but since it runs every day for three months, that’s a lot of kids they got to sign the contract.

          But hey, free trip to Disney with my friends so that was nice. Our accapella version of Bad Touch was a big hit.

  • Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Oh no, her right to not suffer the consequences of her actions was infringed. She should be allowed to say whatever she wants and no one should be able to get upset, they have to accept it, it’s not like other people have rights, only her.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      -1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Her character was fun, but I didn’t think she handled the “deeper” scenes where they tried to fill out her character.

      I loved the show, though, and thought she had potential for future seasons. I don’t miss her not being on the show, and knowing she’s a nutjob erases any sympathy I’d have for her getting Mandy’d.

  • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Why do all these fucking propoganda parrots think their maveriks? Bitch, you aint a radical thinker. You got fired for reposts.

    • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      We don’t need to body shame Elon. There are scads of things we can behavior shame him on, and that has a chance of positively affecting the world (not him, he’ll never see this, but someone out there might see this and reconsider thinking he’s cool.)

  • wolfshadowheart@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m sad that a Lego set came with her minifig. I’m more sad an almost badass Star Wars chick fell to the dark side.