• Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Lemmy.world censors only “removed” and the N word. Lemmy.ml censors “bitch” and various slurs. I believe their users can still see comments with these words in (?), though the censored words are removed if they post them themselves

    • Borger@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      Am I missing something? I have absolutely no idea what you guys are talking about.

      Is there a slur somewhere in this post or the comment section? And TIL that Lemmy communities can censor words. I’m from blahaj.zone btw

      • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        Lemmy instances are able to censor words; it can’t be set per community. When viewing a comment from an instance that censors some word, that word will be replaced with “removed”. This applies to both comments sent by users of that instance, and comments sent by external users.

        Blahaj doesn’t censor any slurs

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      feddit.uk doesn’t censor anything at the moment, because I accidentally broke the slur regex.

      Normally, users from censored instances can still see rude words, they just get removed “in flight” if they try to post anywhere.

        • xantoxis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          The 6-letter version means a bundle of sticks, or a stick, which is how it came to mean cigarette. The 3-letter version is an abbreviation of the 6-letter version. Both of them mean cigarette, and both of them are an anti-gay slur.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          removed and fag are used interchangeably in much of the world. Both have other means, both are derogatory and both mean gay.

          Makes no sense to censor one and not the other.

        • mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m no historian or etymologist but I saw one on YouTube once who said a very similar term was used for poor older women who supposedly went around hunched over all the time picking up sticks for firewood, and then was later transferred to homosexual men to imply they were weak, effeminate, outcast, etc

      • Sjmarf@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Aha, so it seems that other instances do censor external comments for their own users. It was “fag-got”.