• Lord_McAlister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sooooooooooome people say man is made out of mud, the poor man’s made out of muscle and blood. Muscle and blood, skin and bone, a mind that’s weak and a back thats strong… You move 16 tons… whadaya get? Another day older and deeper in debt… St. Peter don’tcha call me because I can’t go…

    I owe my soul… to the company store…

  • Hoozzer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Next they will start issueing company scrip, then a company town around the YouTube mines.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Companies will start using crypto as a way to recreate what scrip was back before it was banned. Meta made a play for that a few years back but luckily they failed.

      • cadekat@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Say what you want about crypto in general, but it’d be an extremely bad choice for company scrip…

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends on the implementation, you can make contracts do anything, and if the bulk of the currency is premined and in the hands of the corporation, they can manipulate its value freely. Not every cryptocurrency works the way Bitcoin or Etherium work, some are quite centralised (see XRP for example).

          Meta could demand that ads on its platform are paid in metabucks, pay employees (partly) in metabucks and manipulate the market by controlling liquidity. Essentially they’d be their own sovereign corporation issuing its own currency.

    • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is unfortunately really common in East-Asia. Samsung employees live in Samsung apartments, ride the Samsung metro to work, pay for things with their Samsung wallet, while they listen to Samsung controlled news. Google would love to become the Samsung of the West.

        • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where does Samsung’s money come from? Like all corporations it comes from extracting the value of its laborers. If you’re working for Samsung, you are paying for the Samsung services, even if it’s not directly apparent.

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fucking company town. Google has become a real shit company. Switch your default search to duck duck go or anything else people!

    • Steeve@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So this is absolutely a scummy move by google, no doubt, but google employees are some of the highest paid people in the world at this point. Boycott them if you want, but don’t feel like you have to right this injustice done to their employees, because they’ve still got it really good.

      Edit: Just so this doesn’t come across as a crabs in a bucket type scenario, I am in this field and I am fortunate enough to make similar money, not as much, but equivalent in my country’s market. We are not the people that need fighting for, we’re the ones that should be fighting for others to have similar opportunities.

          • kamenoko@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your edit doesn’t do it for me. You guys managed to get remote work, and now it’s being taken away. Do you think the pay scale has anything to do with what’s going on here?

            • Steeve@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Google still has fully remote employees, they’re asking non remote employees back into the office a few days a week. Last I heard you can still apply to transfer to fully remote.

      • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        No I just mean the this is yet another item in a LOOOOOOOONG line of things where Google has gone the pure shit route.

        In the last couple years, Google serves me more ads as search results than actual relevant results. The enshitification of the internet is real and I finally see it. I’ve have enough. Between Reddit, twitter, Google, SEO, Facebook and friends, Amazon becoming wish.con, etc everything is just going to shit. Maybe it makes me some old boomer dreaming of the glory days, but I’ve had enough. I refuse to be a product and I refuse to put any money towards these shitmaster overlords if there’s any way I can help it.

        • Steeve@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          All fair reasons to use another service if that’s a deal breaker for sure

          • Devdogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Uhh, yes it is? I mean, if you take a look at how much real estate San Francisco has just in its downtown area that should tell you something.

      • penguin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It has nothing to do with profits. It’s more profitable to have everyone work from home. Upper managers and executives simply prefer having everyone in the office because they like it. It’s their preference.

    • Cosmonaut_Collin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Can we please think of the billionaires? What are they gonna do when their office buildings are empty? They need their property value! /s

  • Thales@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The advertisement entices workers to make the jump, even for a short while, to its on-campus hotel, saying: “Just imagine no commute to the office in the morning and instead, you could have an extra hour of sleep and less friction,” CNBC reported.

    Did these stupid motherfuckers read their own ad??

    No commute and extra sleep? That sounds great!

    No wonder everyone is trying to WFH - the very same reasons you just listed.

  • Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems reasonable enough to me as an option staff can take up, but don’t need to if they have other accomodation or would rather live somewhere not operated by their employer.

    Based on the article it seems the cost is reasonable for the area. Having a cost on the accomodation rather than it being free probably helps stop an influx of people with suitable accommodation already cancelling lease or subletting, to come stay at that building and limiting access to those that need it more. That and no doubt people who couldn’t take it up may feel shafted that their colleagues are getting a $700 a week perk if Google made it free.

    No doubt one can argue the often polarising merits of office work versus remote, but if they’re going to have people come to the office having accomodation available, paid or not, no doubt would be helpful and something many other employers going through a similar transition may not be able to offer.

    • Bramble Dog@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude, you are never going to be in their club.

      Google isn’t getting into the hotel industry to help out an overburdened housing market. This is solely designed to make their immigrant workers more reliant on the company than they already are, while creating a legal loophole to pay them less than the agreed upon rate.

      It also suggests they intend to up the usage of immigrant workers, which will further displace the local housing situation and likely further rise homelessness within the county (and I imagine a rise in white supremacist thinking and action in response.

      This isn’t rational on Google’s part, this is a potential human rights crisis in the making that we really need to speak out against. 21St century company towns will not be different from 1800s company towns in any true meaningful way.

      When we poach the top talent from other countries by selling them on the American dream, we can’t bring them here to have them be an invisible class fully dependent on private corporations. We have to actually let them have the American dream we sold to them.

  • kbity@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    We’ve gone from “work from home” back to “live from work” at an astounding pace. That’s… good? No, wait, the opposite. Fuck this society and the parasitic husks who direct it in this manner.