• argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Windows 95 and Debian were my “holy crap this is cool” operating systems as a kid.

    Windows slowly went to hell over the years, and Debian didn’t, so now I mostly use Debian.

  • redballooon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Mac OS. People say it costs more, but I am not paying for a hardware and then some software that tries to make use of it. Instead I’m paying for a well thought out product that just works.

    • DJDarren@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      that (mostly) just works.

      FTFY

      As a Mac user since 2007 it feels like that statement gets a little less true every couple of years. But for me it’s still light years ahead of Windows when it comes to my workflow.

  • Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Windows 7.

    It was the peak of windows.

    It was slick. It was fast. It was stable, and it was super easy to use. Never had a single problem with it, and unlike past windows OS’s it didnt require regular reformats to clean house for stability.

    Unfortunately its dead now, and Microsoft abandoned that approach and switched to a slow burn approach at walled gardening.

    I use Linux now, have been for years, because I saw where microsoft was going when Win10 was in previews, and there was no way I was going to be part of it… So I jumped ship as soon as EoL was announced for Win 7

    • glue_snorter@lemmy.sdfeu.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Launch by hitting windows key and start typing (this is now a bullshit web search)

      The taskbar was usable (fuck this app grouping)

      Virtual desktops

      Fast

      Stable

      Looked fine

      Hit F8 for recovery options on boot

      System rollback

  • Evkob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use EndeavourOS. I like pacman and AUR, as well as the fact that Arch-based distros are well-supported by most software. I’m too much of a noob/too lazy to setup an OS without a GUI installer though, which is why I prefer Endeavour over Arch.

  • Lolors17@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Fedora and Debian. It just works, can’t complain. Need to use windows 11 on a notebook, absolutely hate it.

  • Loki@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Whatever the fuck my brain runs. It’s done a pretty okay job keeping me alive, and that’s worth something, right?

  • malappapas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I use arch btw.

    Gives me the flexibility to do what I want and contrary to the internet I haven’t managed to break everything. I managed to break Ubuntu through

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Linux of course. I don’t invite Apple or Microsoft into my computer. Apple has good hardware though so I can understand using a mac.

  • I’m mainly privacy and security focused when it comes to software. My first Linux distro was Whonix. It’s like if Tor expanded from the browser into an OS. Its a bit clunky and outdated though, so not a great daily driver. My second and current distro was the KDE spin of Fedora. It’s been amazing top to bottom. Unfortunately Red Hat recently started some drama, but Fedora shouldn’t be impacted as its upstream. If Red Hat’s greasy paws do mess things up, I’m thinking about running OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. Hopefully it’s just me over thinking and Fedora will remain a stellar OS option for years to come.

    • aliens@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you want the security/privacy of whonix capabilities with the flexibility of fedora you should checkout Qubes OS. As long as you have the correct hardware to run Qubes it can make for a secure and unique experience.

      • I’ve given Qubes a go, it’s a bit much for my threat model. Fedora is a well ranked OS from a privacy and security standpoint, not on the same level as Qubes, but Qubes uses it as the base OS. Fedora’s easier on the eyes and straight forward. Is Qubes your daily driver?

  • Zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Love how most of the responses are different distros of Linux.

    1998:

    Me: I’d rather be running Linux

    Systems Manager: Linux is a day late and a dollar short. Novell is the future. Microsoft might be interesting too.

    She went off to teach community college after she got laid off.

  • Can-Utility@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve been a loyal System/MacOS/OS X/macOS user since System 6. From the first time I sat down at a Mac, it’s the only OS family that allows me to forget that I’m using a computer and just do things.

    Architecturally the Classic MacOS was a hacked-together mess (though I was pretty good about managing my extensions, and I put together some pretty impressive uptime with my old Power Macs), but the UI was incredibly fast and responsive. Even on my M2 Pro Mini I don’t believe I can navigate my filesystem as quickly or as easily as I could on my OG iMac running 9.2. And I’d still love to visit an alternate universe where macOS evolved from the Server 1.0 UI rather than the Aqua UI.

    OS X/macOS feels a little more cumbersome, a little less personal. I don’t always love all the new features Apple pushes in its new releases. (IDEK with the new Settings menu.) And I really didn’t love the hoops I had to jump through to get PHP running on my Mini (I could have gone with an all-Homebrew setup, but I wanted to keep things relatively uncomplicated). The last version of macOS I unabashedly loved was 10.14 Mojave. But in the end, I appreciate all the things that bringing Unix to the Mac allows me to do, and there’s enough of the old MacOS DNA that I’m still mostly able to sit down, forget I’m using a computer, and just get my work done. That’s what I look for in an OS.