• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If EULAs are going to be legally binding, there should really be some standard mechanism, an API, on systems to display one such that the system can record a copy and you can see differences and such. Otherwise, you’re entering into a contract with some random party and only they have a copy or and see what changed across versions.

    If such a display API is available on a given platform and isn’t used, could simply make the EULA automatically non-binding.

    I’m willing to believe that there are legitimately cases where one does need license agreements to fix issues that extend beyond standard consumer law, but the current situation is simply a dumpster fire.

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      One thing to keep in mind, though. They have more money than we do and will use this extra step to make it that much harder for them to face any consequences of their negative actions

    • planish@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just start sending your own terms back to them. They accepted the terms and provided the thing? Great!

    • xradeon@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I do like the idea of industry standard license.

      My thoughts are:

      • They need to limit EULAs to something like 600 words.
      • Make them binding and non-changing to the product purchased, only newly purchased products can get the updated EULA.
      • They should make a Ethics Policy (things like no cheating, be kind, no swearing, etc.) separate from the EULA. This Ethics policy can be updated whenever.