• Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Lemmy.ml is focused on FOSS and Privacy, and is generally a “generalist” instance with that FOSS and Privacy slant.

      Lemmygrad.ml is an explicitly Marxist-Leninist instance for Marxist-Leninists.

      They really aren’t comparable instances outside of the dev connection.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      When everyone dislikes your poorly thought out reactions and you respond to that disdain with calls for nuking entire hemispheres of the only planet we can live on, you kinda have to hide your identity/ideologies by way of obfuscation.

      They seem proud and vocal in their echo chamber but these fools are weaker than a watery shit irl.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Obfuscation. They know lemmygrad is too obviously tankie for most people, but lemmy.ml is not so obvious. The .ml is a dogwhistle that a lot of users won’t understand, so they can buy some measure of legitimacy that way. I guess they keep lemmygrad because they also want a place where they can go full mask-off.

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        If your theory is correct, then why would they also keep many of their users uninformed? Referring to Lemmy.ml, of course. You claim it’s for legitimacy, but doesn’t that cease to fulfill its purpose? Is the goal to make a generalist instance, but with slightly more MLs, but also divert the MLs to Lemmygrad?

        I’m not sure your theory is correct, I think Lemmy.ml is just what it says it is: a generalist, FOSS and Privacy focused instance run by the devs, who are MLs.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          If your theory is correct, then why would they also keep many of their users uninformed? Referring to Lemmy.ml, of course. You claim it’s for legitimacy, but doesn’t that cease to fulfill its purpose?

          Because the users that don’t know what the instance is for are the ones that help lend legitimacy to it, because then people like you can believe that it’s just a general instance with no political undertones. You aren’t running cover for them, you are their cover.

          Just think for a second about what you’re suggesting. They want to make an instance that is to lend legitimacy to a fringe political ideology, and they openly tell all of their users that that’s exactly what they’re doing? Then all anyone would need to do to destroy that legitimacy would be to publish whatever message the users receive explaining the true purpose of the instance. The cover only works if it’s deniable, and your idea would make it completely undeniable.

          Is the goal to make a generalist instance, but with slightly more MLs, but also divert the MLs to Lemmygrad?

          That is one of the goals, yes.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Sorry, I really think this is ridiculous. Is Lemmy.world a cover for Liberalism, because it’s run by liberals? Is db0 a cover for Anarchism and Libertarian Socialism, because db0 is a Libertarian Socialist? This is just red-scare style paranoia.

            The very existance of Lemmygrad.ml should prove that there is an explicitly Marxist-Leninist space for MLs, and Lemmy.ml is a generalist instance for people who don’t care enough about that but want a server dedicated to FOSS and Privacy.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Is Lemmy.world a cover for Liberalism, because it’s run by liberals? Is db0 a cover for Anarchism and Libertarian Socialism, because db0 is a Libertarian Socialist?

              Liberals and libertarian socialists are usually pretty open about what they believe, so there’s no cover needed. They’re not fringe ideologies like tankies have.

              However neoliberalism is a fairly hated ideology. If the people who ran lemmy.world were literally the same people running a neoliberalism sub on that instance and they also ran thatcher.love or whatever, and they banned people for saying neoliberalism was trash, then yeah, it would be a reasonable inference that lemmy.world was some sort of entryist ploy.

              It is the existence of lemmygrad combined with the behaviour of the people running lemmy.ml that makes the case to defederate. If that happens and you don’t like it, you could always migrate your account, unless you like it there, in which case you’re probably not the normie you first appeared to be.

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Lemmy.world regularly bans Marxist-Leninists, it is a two-way street there.

                Again, I truly don’t see how Lemmygrad taking the marxist-leninists means Lemmy.ml is a cover for Marxism-Leninism, it’s a non-political community focused on FOSS and Privacy.

                • Kedly@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  “it’s a non-political community focused on FOSS and Privacy.” -moderated and controlled at least somewhat by tankies who will delete your comment and possibly ban you for saying things about their flavour of communism that they dont like

              • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Completely tangential, but imma be real with you: libsocs are fringe too.

                Indeed, socialism of any sort is pretty fringe in most of the West.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  That’s a fair point, although I would say socialism is becoming less fringe, and it seems like the various types of libsoc are the main forms of socialism because people have seen the failures of state based solutions, even amongst demsocs/socdems.

                  That said, I kind of agree and the word “fringe” didn’t sit quite right. On reflection a better word would be “covert”, since ideologies that explicitly want to dominate people tend to hide what they are, since they know it’s not acceptable to state their aims up front. That’s really the idea I was getting at.

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              The whole reason this was posted is because of the users posting they hot banned from ml for stating facts that tankies disagree with.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    There are people who think they’re at all different?

    I’m pretty sure lemmygrad was explicitly created to be the mask off equivalent of .ml

  • emmie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    ml is okayish compared to hexbear lol

    I thought at first it was some fun leftist lgbt place but quickly I ran into violent bloodthirsty comments that made my skin crawl. there are also many of my lovely fellow transfems over there ugh. it is really sad when people are lost into the void of extremism. But I don’t really blame them however I grieve them.

  • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I think for many is shock and surprise is that anything even remotely “ml” is even allowed. Like something illegal is being allowed in plain sight.

          • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Someone better tell these people they all could be arrested at any moment!

            https://www.cpusa.org/

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA

            No but seriously it’s an unenforceable junk law that no one has bothered to take the time to repeal that was never even really used in the first place. I mean, the communist party runs candidates for office to this day. Someone finally tried to use it in 1972 to keep a communist candidate off the ballot and a federal district Court promptly ruled it unconstitutional.

            https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/1zey0ee5l/arizona-district-court/blawis-v-bolin/

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ah, fair, didn’t see that it got repealed. My original point was more to state that the legal system works against Communism, America is a thoroughly anti-Communist project both within and without.

              • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                I’d say more broadly the legal and political system works against any organizations that threaten the status quo, but yes America’s attitudes toward communism have been pretty obvious throughout the twentieth century. I just took issue with the idea that political parties or idealogies are illegal in and of themselves in the US, constitution still manages to protects some things.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Who makes that distinction? Plus, the idea of destroying the state, Capitalism, class divides, and money definitely is legally opposed.

              • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Who makes that distinction?

                Anyone versed in basic political theory.

                An ideology and a political organization are obviously different. Just like republicanism and The Republican Party, democracy and The Democratic Party, socialism and The Socialist Party, etc.

                destroying the state

                That’s technically sedition, so, yes, illegal.

                Capitalism

                Nowhere in U.S. jurisprudence is “capitalism” (verbatim) explicitly protected as an economic system. The 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause prevents the state from taking someone’s life, liberty, or property without a proper justification under the laws of the land. The Constitution protects individuals from the government. Freedom to contract is a principle that underpins the basis for a free-market economy.

                After the Great Depression, the Court began to treat the freedom to contract as less than absolute, asserting that such freedom may be limited by the State’s interest to protect its citizens. Capitalism is a right guaranteed by the constitution but limited in scope to protect individuals against the dangers of laissez-faire capitalism.

                class divides

                There are no explicit laws in U.S. jurisprudence (that I know of or have turned up on brief internet searches) that enforce “class divides”.

                money

                Be it resources, precious metals, or legal tender, money is protected by the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

                So we can conclude that the advocacy or practice of communism isn’t itself illegal. Forcing people to practice it or overthrowing the government and dissolving The Bill of Rights in order to force people to practice most certainly is.

                In my opinion, that’s a good thing.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Communism isn’t Communalism. Advocating for Communism and attempting to implement Communism at a national level is illegal, as you’ve shown.

              • force@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Who makes that distinction?

                … literally anyone who thinks about it? The US Communist Party is one party, there are plenty of other parties that identify as communist. You don’t have to be called “The Communist Party” to be communist.

                Socialist Alternative

                Revolutionary Communist Party

                Workers World Party

                New Afrikan Black Panther Party

                Party for Socialism and Liberation

                Communist parties aren’t popular at all, but they’re far from banned. There are multiple Marxist, ML, Maoist, etc. parties.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Laws are interpreted and wielded by those in power. The Democrats are already called Communists, what happens if a genuine Socialist party takes some amount of power?

          • oatscoop@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            If you had actually read the Wikipedia article:

            In 1973, a federal district court in Arizona decided that the act was unconstitutional, and Arizona could not keep the party off the ballot in the 1972 general election (Blawis v. Bolin). In 1961, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the act did not bar the party from participating in New York’s unemployment insurance system (Communist Party v. Catherwood).

            So yes, the law passed during the the McCarthy era … and was afterwards declared unconstitutional.

            The Communist Party USA is still around.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ah, fair, didn’t see that it got repealed. My original point was more to state that the legal system works against Communism, America is a thoroughly anti-Communist project both within and without.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Not formally. Talk to a cop while wearing a red bandana and clothing with a red star or hammer and sickle on it.

          (Please don’t ban me for suggesting suicide, I don’t actually want them to do this)

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      womp womp that’s a mean comment

      🚨🚨mean comment detected your opinion does not matter🚨🚨

    • realitista@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      They’re our crazy uncle that we try to keep locked in the basement but sometimes guests hear the crazed incomprehensible ranting from the cellar door.

    • Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      In case you havent been here long enough to know what a Tankie is, on top of what everyone else has shared: A Tankie is a Communist who thinks Russia and China have done nothing wrong, they’ll try and make you think we call ALL communists/left leaning people Tankies, but no, the Tank part of Tankie comes from shit like Tiananmen Square where they used tanks to destroy their political opposition, and Tankies are perfectly fine with this/claim shit like Tiananmen Square is propoganda.

      Tldr: Communist/Socialists/leftists who arent a fan of Russia and China’s dictatorial tendencies? Not a Tankie. Communist who’ll defend Russia and China to the point of thinking maybe Ukraine deserves to be invaded and that Taiwan should be absorbed by China? Tankie

      Edit: Even more TL:Dr? They’re the leftist version of a Nazi Brony

      Edit the third: Tankies, downvotes by you hold as much meaning as a downvote on youtube does… I saw the downvote count go from 1-6 in 15 minutes so you could make it look like as much people disagreed with me as agreed

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The ml stands for Marxist Leninist. Basically, it means the admins of an instance ending in ml has been some revolting politics.

      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        And not just Marxist Leninism, but revanchist Marxist Leninism which denies the wrongdoing of not only Stalin and Mao but also Putin and Xi entirely and blames anything that happened in history or present on the West.

        Ie. Tankies.

        I wouldn’t really have much problem with them if they were Marxist Leninist and still acknowledged history and reality. Unfortunately that’s not the case.

        • Grayox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          We acknowledge history and reality. Calling all of us Tankies is such a cop out. Putin bad, Xi is pretty chill comparatively speaking to Putin. Lemmy.ml is a beacon of free speech and ideas compared to Lemmygrad and hexbear, where i have had multiple comments deleted when I wrote well thought put arguments around voting for the lesser of 2 evils to be the best course of action to protect the Prolitariat while forming the Class Conciousness necessary for any sort of true Marxist society to form. Yall calling anyone left of Democratic Socialist is reactionary af.

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            We acknowledge history and reality

            Not in my experience. I’ve had 100% factual comments that include links to widely respected sources deleted with no explanation.

            Lemmy.ml isn’t even communist, that’s just a mask for their authoritarian propaganda. I respect communists and I hate Lemmy.ml

          • realitista@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            This doesn’t match the reality I’ve experienced there unfortunately. And I did give it the good old college try before giving up.

          • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Beacon of free speech? That’s not only a huge stretch, I’m gonnq say thats bullshit altogether, go look at the modlog and you might change your mind. They delete and ban people for having different opinions, even when they have sources and evidence.

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            See a lot of us who frequently call out Tankies dont consider YOU a Tankie if what you state your opinions about Putin and Xi are true. A LOT of us are sick of people who supposedly care about oppressed classes sucking off dictators though.

        • Beanson@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I assumed that’s what it stood for because it was listed as hosting tech-focused communities.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yup, same. Well, half a year later I found out the hidden truth 🌚 and keep forgetting it every time, still

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Also, “Marxism-Leninism” as a term was coined by Stalin, but there’s a reason people avoid the term “Stalinism”, because even these people understand that his horrific legacy can’t be revised.

        So whenever you hear the term, you can understand that it’s basically Stalinism papered over with the names of dead men who couldn’t object to him puppeteering them and coopting their legacy to lend legitimacy to his reign of terror.

  • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    What we really need is a Schism, and for all the ml domains to defederate from the rest of the lemmyverse, and just become their own thing.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        It actually would be a good thing. Pariah instances are how the fediverse will have to moderate itself, and these people have shown themselves to be incapable of playing well with others. I purposely avoided joining any of their subs because I saw how toxic their influence was on reddit.

        If you look at peertube, there’s one instance that hosts Steven Crowder and Alex Jones and like two other people who I assume are lesser demons of some kind. I would avoid any instance that doesn’t have the good sense to defederate from that one. This is a similar thing. I doubt the tankies are going to be on the popular side of the schism if it happens, they would have an echo chamber and we would be rid of them.

        The thing about an echo chamber like that is that thanks to the public nature of federation status, it would be obvious who the pariah instances are, so anyone still there would be made aware that they are the minority, not the voice of the people in any way. That’s something that takes longer to notice in a forum like truth social. The numbers might be there for people to see, but it’s a different platform so you can say there’s a slow adoption rate or something, like you can say about Lemmy. With pariah instances there is a direct and obvious comparison, and people have left because your instance fucked up. That’s going to drive all but the most hardcore folks away to other instances.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          ooh i never knew about the crowder/jones peertube thing, thanks for this analysis!

          also for those downvoting you, it’s not really even an echo chamber. my instance defederates both, nevertheless i hear about shit that goes down on .ml literally daily, same as i am still well aware of the latest on crowder and jones.

          defederation literally just means i’m spared the curse of having to deal with the shit firsthand. i still have no lack of understanding of the positions involved.

        • Maeve@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I welcome diversity of opinion. I may accidentally learn something. If I find a poster or instance I find particularly distasteful, I can block them. No need to censor unless it’s human trafficking, CSA., gore, and especially the American exceptionalist vote blue/maga stuff.

          I’m not particularly into right or left wing authoritarianism, but I enjoy learning something beyond typical American propaganda.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I don’t think you understand just how persistent these people can be, Internet Communist is their personality. The last time I looked, all their memes were thinly veiled jabs at capitalism, or the US, or about their politics in some way, they find a way to shoehorn it into every single conversation.

            They’re also in support of almost everything Russia does, including invading their neighbours, and opposed to everything the US does.

            They’re awful, they’re abrasive, and they get everywhere.

            • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Internet Communist is their personality

              Not really, it’s their facade. They’re not actually communists, it’s just a mask they use to spread CCP and Kremlin propaganda. Plus their paid to do it, they’re not authentic.

          • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            This isn’t about diversity of opinion. I will happily talk to a tankie and explain why I think they are wrong, unless they’re a toxic asshole in which case I will simply point out that fact. The problem is when tankies get in charge of forums they behave like toxic assholes, and then yeah, I think we should ditch that forum.

            • Maeve@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              What’s stopping you from blocking a particular instance? Why do you want to block it from me?

              • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Nobody is blocking you from it. You can go find an instance that doesn’t defederate. You can make an account with them. Literally nobody is stopping you.

                If the admins of your instance agree it should be defederated and you disagree, then I guess that instance isn’t a good fit for you.

                This isn’t like… a difficult concept, so I have to ask what it is about it that you’re struggling with.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      What we really need is a Schism, and for all the ml domains to defederate from the rest of the lemmyverse, and just become their own thing.

      But due its size, it’s also full of regular people. [email protected] is a good Linux community. Why block the entire instance when the Mao fanboys are just active in certain politics communities?

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          You can move a community with all subscribers? How? Does this work if the server was already defederated? Why defederate an entire server if only specific communities are problematic? Just block those.

          • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Basically set up a community with the same name on another instance, and say “everyone go over there”

            If it’s done officially by the mods, then the new community becomes the official one.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              And that statement is one nobody can read because the server has already been defederated. Doesn’t sound like the best idea. Just block the Mao fanboy communities you don’t like. Definitely a lower impact than blocking sane communities on that server like [email protected] for everyone.

            • Match!!@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              no matter how bad it might seem here I can promise reddit is a thousand times worse

            • pukeko@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Let me give an example: I have a friend on Bluesky. He’s as middle of the road as it’s possible to be (and I say that in an entirely neutral way; it makes him neither better nor worse than anyone). He’s nice, and a good person. But he’s aggressive, disruptive, a fight-picker, and a single-issue conversationalist on social media. Bluesky seems to have a disproportionate number of people who are very nice, well-meaning, but aggressive and disruptive. I left Bluesky to exit an echo chamber for something more serene. I think that’s one thing the loud folk don’t quite get, regardless of their ideology: not all of us are here to yell and throw things all the time.

            • mihnt@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              There are instances that don’t defederate at all. Or block piracy communities.

  • Kiwi@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Hi just migrated from Lemmy.ml. just wondering what a tankie actually is? I’ve heard it used a lot especially on Lemmy. My guess is some kind of pro CCP kind of communist but that’s my best guess

    Edit: Nvm just googled it. Its pretty much what I wrote.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      yeah you p much got it, (e: specifically they are v v chill with violence against innocents and authoritarianism to bring about their chosen regime. im already getting downvoted in this comment tho so yeah just go look at the wikipedia page 😭)

      • Albatross2724@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Does that mean most Americans are tankies when it comes to Israel’s ongoing genocide of Palestinians 🤔

        **Clearly struck a cord with the bloodthirsty genocide supporters

          • Albatross2724@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Oh yeah I forgot. Communism is bad, but mass killing brown Muslims is fine because they’re subhuman cannon fodder for furthering America’s Military Industrial Complex. Thanks for clearing that up.

            • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              plenty of the people leveraging the word “tankie” against tankies are communists, or at least socialists, just less authoritarian ones. and i’d venture to guess that the vast majority of those people are anti-genocide, including the case of Gaza.

              please take the smallest of measures to understand the positions at foot before stuffing straw men into everyone’s mouths. you look quite foolish here.

            • Klara@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Communism isn’t bad per se, authoritarianism is, but there are many authoritarian regimes going under the name ‘communist’, thus we have a term for that: tankie. Using different terms to describe the Israeli state (like fascist, ethno-nationalist, or Zionist) and its supporters does not mean it’s not bad. It really is! It’s just categorically different in the ideology espoused by them, and having language to describe that is not bad.

              • Albatross2724@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Intentionally missing the point of the irony behind Americans using words that allude to ignoring a genocide while actively ignoring a genocide they’re tax dollars are funding.

        • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          no that doesn’t mean that. tankies are communist. most americans are not generally communists

    • Gabu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Depends on whether the person saying it is a fellow leftie or a rightwinger brainlet. To the first, it’s what you described - an anti-Marxist communist. To the second group, anyone left of Nixon.

      • htrayl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        IMO a tankie on the left is just a pure anti-west authoritarian cosplaying as a communist - the communism is largely window dressing and they are generally perfectly happy defending Russia (obviously not communist) or authoritarian nonsense from China and other communist countries.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Wtf is an anti-Marxist communist? Is that like a swimmer that can’t swim? Arizona just outlawed abortion, and have senators speaking in tongues while praying on the floor of the house. President Biden is fully endorsing a genocide in the Middle East. Trump might become the first dictator of America.

        And ya’ll worried about ?.?.“”TANKIES””. ?.?

        Get some GD perspective.

        • YeetPics@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Get some GD perspective.

          That’s fucking RICH, and that’s coming from a lib who apparently only knows how to genocide for vast wealth and power.

          • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I’m a white, upper middle class boomer living in America who is registered independent, but consistently voted for Democrats for the past 28 years. I did vote for Ross Perot in ‘92, because I wanted a third party. I’m as far removed from a “tankie” as you can get.

            Why is it wrong to think for yourself and form your own opinions? Ya’ll just want to hate on people to pretend you have some control in this chaotic world.

            It makes me sad that so many want to spread hate instead of love.

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              To be fair, I only have you labaled as “tankie apologist” on my app.

              And tankies poison the well, they are something to be concerned about even if worse things are happening.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                That’s fair. I’m more worried about climate change than the pettiness of leftist infighting, so I will continue to apologize for any group that is anti-capitalist.

                I’m pragmatic enough to understand that when a planned economy comes, and it will, we may not have the time and opportunities to choose which structures replace capitalism. It may be an amalgamation of many socialist strategies.

                I find it pointless to bicker over socialism, when fascism is the bigger threat. But it is entertaining.

        • Imotali@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re comment is wrong. But non-marxian communism exists. For example council communism.

          But a Tankie is basically a Leninist/Stalinist/Maoist communist who dick rides authoritarianism.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Neither are social democrats, but we take help where we can get it. If we exclude anyone anti-fascist, that division will be exploited. We can’t afford to lose sight of the true enemy, the billionaire ruling class.

            • barsoap@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Council communism is basically methadone therapy for Marxists, for those that can’t make the leap to Anarchism. Council Communism is essentially indistinguishable (in practice, theory is a bit different) from Syndicalism.

              As to campism: Somehow it’s always the authoritarians calling for “left unity”, that of course meaning “follow Stalin”. No, we don’t seek the same goals, and, no, we didn’t forget the Bolsheviks allying with fascists to stab Anarchists in the back.

              • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                “The anarchists point of view is the most disruptive element in the New Left and should be capitalized on in the most confusing ways,” the FBI wrote. [Source](“The anarchists point of view is the most disruptive element in the New Left and should be capitalized on in the most confusing ways,” the FBI wrote.)

                Why were the FBI okay with Anarchists, but not Marxists Leninist like the Black Panthers?

  • peteypete420@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Newbie here, do I not see lemmygrad stuff on my “all” feed because I am on the shitjustworks instance?

    I can pull it up in the search bar, but don’t seem able to subscribe.

    I probably need to watch a newbs guide to the fediverse video or something. Like I understand the basic idea, but not the nuances or technical stuff.

    • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      yes! @[email protected] doesn’t like grad and defederated from them.

      here’s why in their own words:

      The decision to block the Lemmygrad instance was less a question of censorship, and more an issue of personal conviction. As a volunteer dedicating my personal resources and time to facilitating a space for users to create, discover, and discuss - not just on this instance, but across the Fediverse - I admit that this choice was made alone, selfishly, without the consent or thoroughly considering the collective opinion of the community. With the above said, sh.itjust.works has had the lemmygrad instance blocked from its first day.

      • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Actually, there was a vote immediately after the defederation to see whether people wanted lemmygrad refederated, and about 80-90% of the votes were to stay defederated, so it seems the users of sh.itjust.works also don’t like grad.

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s worth noting about your edit: I’m pretty sure hexbear was the one that initiated defederation from shit over shit posters being transphobic and harassing users in dms.

          • starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            You are correct, hexbear did defederate from sh.itjust.works about a week after federating with them, so the vote became moot.

            The reason you gave is part of the reason hexbear admins gave, but I would take what they say with a grain of salt. I’ve seen people say things like “being trans in thoughts is a much different experiece than being trans in the way you dress, act, and look” and hexbear users will call that transphobic/uninclusive, as well as generally being vitriolic and unpleasant.

            As an example, a post where someone says “Biden brings up minimum wage increase and asks other democrats to speak up” will have several comments from hexbear users saying “capitalist bootlickers defending Biden should be shot like the vermin they are.” Maybe some users harassed hexbear users for these comments? I personally didn’t see any but it’s definitely possible.

    • spujb@lemmy.cafeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      defed.xyz lets you check.

      looks like your instance is defederated by lemmygrad, so that’s probably what’s up.

    • Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah. Also, your instance is pretty well known for doing little about the vast numbers of hard right and alt right individuals on it who seek out and harass left leaning individuals, so it’s in both instances best interest to be separated.

      • peteypete420@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Thanks for the heads up. Outside of a couple instances I see mentioned all the time, Im not really sure of the differences between them all and their reputations. Lemmy world was my first attempt, but two or three times the account creation did not work. I’m sure it was user error, but I’m not sure how exactly I messed up.