Global digital rights advocates are watching to see if Congress acts, worried that other countries could follow suit with app bans of their own.

  • Quantum Cog@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 个月前

    Then How is Google different? From my view, It also manipulates search results.

    I don’t understand what US problem with China is.

    Note: I am not an American nor a Chinese. I have never used tiktok before. I am just an outsider trying to get a perspective.

    • rigatti@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 个月前

      The US and China maintain a good economic relationship but aren’t exactly buddies when it comes to geopolitical issues and have very different viewpoints on things like human rights and democracy.

      • Quantum Cog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        5 个月前

        Yes, I know about that. But why is US limiting technological advancements in China? (By banning GPUs / companies).

        I don’t see China doing the same.

        • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 个月前

          Are you kidding? China has some of the strongest censorship laws in the world which includes filtering internet content and blocking access to apps. North Korea is the only country that has more repressed access to free information.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_China

          The Chinese government has banned, among others, Google, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Reddit, BBC, Wikipedia and … are you ready for this … TIKTOK. The Chinese government agrees that TikTok should be banned (though for different reasons).

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_websites_blocked_in_mainland_China

          • Quantum Cog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 个月前

            I was not talking about censorship. I was talking about technological advancements.

            But you have a fair point as this post is about censorship.

            • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 个月前

              How is banning TikTok “limiting technological advancements”?

              Would you agree that I was able to provide examples of “China doing the same” which you stated that you “did not see”?

              • Quantum Cog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 个月前

                I was not talking about tiktok. I was talking about them banning sale of high performance gpus to china

                • prole@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 个月前

                  Don’t know anything about the specific situation about GPUs, but I do know that I’m not allowed to purchase an affordable Chinese EV in the US…

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 个月前

      I think one difference is Google is a pull system: you query Google and get results. The short form video streams are push mediums. They feed you a stream of content that it thinks you want. They are fundamentally more susceptible to pushing a particular agenda.

      The evidence from the reports in the above article certainly looks pretty daming that tiktok is pushing a particular agenda. The comparison to broadcast which often does have licensing requirements is probably apt.

      I don’t buy the arguement that this gives cover to repressive regimes to censor more views because frankly they are doing that already.

      • Quantum Cog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 个月前

        In my country every platform is pushing some kind of bias from the government.Government can ask to remove any kind of content from YouTube, Facebook, tiktok, etc. Especially political ones.

        I have seen YouTube favoring one party in particular in their breaking news section even on a new account.

        On a sidenote, its good for tiktok to be banned, I hate short form content.

      • isles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        Isn’t broadcast licensing specifically about partitioning radio spectrum space, which isn’t applicable here? US-based social media isn’t licensed and applying radio era law to internet may not be appropriate.

        • Alex@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 个月前

          From the UK perspective broadcasters have a license to broadcast and are regulated by ofcomm. I thought the FCC had similar oversight of the US broadcasters - for example not being keen on swearing and sex on TV. For UK news programmes there is a requirement to be balanced for example.

          • isles@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 个月前

            Most assuredly, the licensing of the spectrum comes with requirements and strings, so those broadcasters are regulated. They must follow the rules or risk their license.

            However, radio licensing came about to avoid broadcast “collisions” for amateur radio operators in ~1912. Regulations came later under the FCC in 1934.

            These same collisions are not applicable to the internet (or rather, we’ve already used methods to avoid them, like DNS).

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 个月前

        The evidence from the reports in the above article certainly looks pretty daming that tiktok is pushing a particular agenda.

        What evidence? What reports?