• hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    First of all, I want to make it clear that I’m glad to answer genuine questions made in good faith (no pun intended), but I won’t argue with anyone.

    I’m a practicing Hellenic Polytheist and this is my personal experience. I do not only worship deities with names and myths, but also the twinkling of stars, the waves of the ocean, the colors of a sunset, the kindling of a fire on a cold winter day, and the rustling of leaves in the treetops. Sometimes I look at the sky and see stars so far away that we will (probably) never reach them, and that feels divine to me. There’s something that can’t be described with words that is too great for a human to understand, and I find that something so beautiful that I will worship it.

    Got a bit poetic there, but I also think that my relationship with religion has also been influenced by the good old autism a lot. I find the psychology behind religion very fascinating, and I think that for some people, especially those who have been raised in a certain faith, it is a “home” that provides comfort in difficult situations. For some people, the thought that a recently deceased loved one is now in Heaven or has been reincarnated as someone/something else is probably a lot easier to accept than that they don’t exist anymore in any shape or form.

    That being said, I also want to state that I always try to maintain a healthy sense of scepticism with my beliefs, whether they be religious, moral, or political, because blind belief never leads to anything good. I think that sadly the darker aspects of religion, such as cults and using religion to justify unjust power structures (the patriarchy or the divine right of kings for example) are hard to get rid of.

  • BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Religion is an old form of it is what is, hope, direction, tradition, and community.

    Can’t explain a thing or understand it God’s will or only God knows. Can’t do anything to help a person because they are in surgery pray or talk to God to wish for good outcomes.

    Don’t feel loved or know what to do or wanted. God loves you, will show you the way, and wants you.

    Most traditions and communities in the west were founded on a religion so you have hundreds of people to connect with at a church and maybe millions world wide that will help. Those raised on books of wisdom or what is right and wrong still tend to keep the values even after they move away from the religion but realize they can have values without divine beings

    Lastly control. Just like businesses it is easier to control people under a religion so if you can get people indebted, traditionalized, and ostracized otherwise. You can control people easily. Lots of people don’t know what to do and why trust another human being but if a human being says wisely God said this it is easier to accept and gain a direction

  • Revonult@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 days ago

    The alternative is absolutely unfathomable. Like I am an atheist and the fact we exist in any capacity is insane. Where did everything come from? Where will it go? People believe in religion because it’s easier.

    When I have an existential crisis over it I sometimes wish I was religious.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Because the lowest common denominator is much MUCH lower than you think it is.

    This means it’s easy to indoctrinate and easy to maintain that for a massive number of people.

    Scientific illiteracy is extremely high, and actual “6th grade reading comprehension” is the highest level of literacy for > 50% of a country like the U.S. and ~20% are low literacy or actually illiterate.

    This means that half of everyone in the U.S. can read and understand what they read at or below a 6th grade level. This isn’t “reading big words”, it’s “tell us about what you read”, “what is the relationship between x & y” type questions.

    This comment for example, up to this point only, would be difficult to understand & comprehend for > 50% of people in the U.S. (it demands an 11th grade reading comprehension). And may be misread, misunderstood, or not understood at all.

    People are driven to religions to cults and alt conspiracy theories when they don’t understand how the world works around them. They latch onto extremely simple often misleading or incorrect ideas of how the world works because they can understand it and it “makes sense” within their sphere of ignorance (we all have one, this isn’t meant to be a disparaging term).

    This means that the problem is that humans are just not smart enough to escape religion yet. It’s the simplest answer, and it appears to be correct.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    I like how all these answers involving science fail to realize that the scientific method was used exclusively by many scholars and students who had no historical evidence of giving up their religion.

    Empirical evidence is as old as humans, and afaik the modern scientific method has been in use since the Islamic golden age if not older.

    The key here is that many of these people did not consider religion an empirical issue but a philosophical and ethical one. Particularly with the monotheistic religions, this would make sense because you can easily argue that it would be impractical to test for the existence of God.

    I think a better question would be why do people believe in their respective religion if it contains a glaring contradiction(s).

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Alternative ways of explaining the world have been around for like a century and a half, and religious conversion is slow.

    Why we did religion in the first place instead of just “I dunno where stuff came from or why” is a much more interesting question IMO.

  • Philote@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Gods are literally just a psychological comfort blanket to explain the unexplainable. Most religious people don’t put that much thought into what they believe, challenging concepts are just tucked nicely away in the “Gods will” box and they move on. I think everyone copes with those brain shattering concepts in their own creative way or risk getting buried alive in anxiety.

  • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    I’m not religious at all. But in responding to your question OP: we don’t have to understand why people believe. Religion just isn’t for us, and that’s fine. Other people find it has value, and that’s fine too. The fact that religion has lasted this long with this many people is proof in itself that there’s some value people get out of it. We don’t have to get it to understand that.

    All the comments here that explain religion solely as dumb or irrational are just as closed minded as the people they’re criticising.

  • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    They are taught about it from childhood and many of us don’t questions stuff we’ve learnt in our childhood.

    Education fails to instil scientific temper in them

    Lack of proper mental health awareness and support.

    • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Even if they do question, it’s not like they are in a safe environment to do so openly. They have to be prepared to give up community, friends, family, potentially their physical safety, and a worldview that says exactly who to be and how to live to be living a good life. That’s a huge step.

      I know for a fact there are religious people going through the motions because the alternative is too frightening, just like people stay in bad marriages.

      • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        12 days ago

        Right. Throughout human history, if someone was cast out of a community, they didn’t survive. We’ve been trained through evolution to go along with the tribe because it’s unsafe to question anything and get cast out.

        • gaifux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          Survival of the fittest. Evolution does not value truth or mortality, so for example secret rapists are a highly successful adaptation regardless of the morality of the action. If evolution is a correct model of reality, this pesky religion and moral agency will diminish with time. True progress. Maybe we can start counting the years from the big bang instead of that Jesus event or w/e!

      • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I agree. The support aspect is very strong. Can’t go against it, unless you are lucky and/or skilled. Or very brave.

    • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      They are taught about it from childhood

      in one single word >> Indoctrinated

      OP this is why people believe in religion, and it’s nearly impossible to get them out of it, you can’t reason someone out of something they weren’t reasoned into in the first place

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I find this a seemingly straight-forward point I’ve never gotten a religious person to acknowledge.

        99.99999% of people follow the religion they do because their parents did. Not because it’s true. That Christian, that Hindu, that Jew. It’s just because they were told it was true at birth.

        If their religion was actually the Truth, why would that be the case…?

        • 乇ㄥ乇¢ㄒ尺ㄖ@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I find this a seemingly straight-forward point I’ve never gotten a religious person to acknowledge.

          because they don’t see it that way, they have their own understanding of free will, religion sells itself as test ( for the most part ), if you pass the test ( temptation or whatever you wanna call it ) you’re qualified to enter heaven, so in a way even if you’re born christian or a Muslim you still going to get tested, so in their view it doesn’t change anything, but from our perspective, it changes everything because we bet that if their parents didn’t make them that way, they would never go that route on their own…

          99.99999% of people follow the religion they do because their parents did. Not because it’s true. That Christian, that Hindu, that Jew. It’s just because they were told it was true at birth.

          That’s why we must address the root cause of all this, which is religion, in Islam for example “Prophet” Mohammed piss be upon him, said

          “Every child is born in a state of fitrah, then his parents make him into a Jew or a Christian or a Magian.” (Agreed upon)

          As you can see, Mohammed doesn’t apply his own observation on his beliefs and because people glorify him, they will never dare to question his reasoning, which is also their own reasoning now…

          You can tell a religious person to criticise everything and everyone, and they can, tell them to redirect their critism to their own belief, and suddenly they’ll become intellectually handicapped

      • gaifux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        My search for truth in my early 30’s led me to study the world’s religions, having grown up secular and feeling like something was missing. But don’t let this anecdote or others like it get in the way of your logic. You’re doing pretty good for a hairless monkey!

    • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      12 days ago

      Education fails to instil scientific temper in them

      Islam used to be the forefront of scientific and mathematical discovery. Believing in god have nothing to do with science or math, it’s superstition, something that cannot be proven or unproven, it’s that irrational thought that make us human.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Islam used to be the forefront of scientific and mathematical discovery.

        No, Islamic COUNTRIES did. They didn’t achieve excellence in science because Islam benefitted science.

        They achieved excellence in science compared to Christian countries in large part because their religious authority figures didn’t stand in the way anywhere near as much. Not because religion helped.

        Believing in god have nothing to do with science

        Not true. They are polar opposites. That’s why scientists are disproportionately atheist and agnostic: the evidence based mode of thinking employed in science doesn’t mix with the superstitious and unquestioningly convinced thinking of religion without some SERIOUS cognitive dissonance.

        it’s that irrational thought that make us human

        No. That’s not being human, that’s being brainwashed and/or obedient to authority.

        You’re right that it’s irrational and that irrationality is an inherent part of being human, but the SPECIFIC irrationality of religion is learned and enforced, NOT inherent.

        • Annoyed_🦀 🏅@monyet.cc
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          No, Islamic COUNTRIES did. They didn’t achieve excellence in science because Islam benefitted science.

          No one claiming it is.

          They achieved excellence in science compared to Christian countries in large part because their religious authority figures didn’t stand in the way anywhere near as much, not because religion helped.

          Not sure how much difference is by changing “Islam” to “Islamic countries”, because the fact still remain that Muslim make scientific discovery and excel in mathematics despite being religious. Again, no one claiming Islam benefitted science.

          Not true. They are polar opposites.

          You just contradicted your last point. Also science are not religion, how can an apple be polar opposite to orange? One can believe in santa clause and ghost while excel in science. It’s not mutually exclusive.

          That’s why scientists are disproportionately atheist and agnostic: the evidence based mode of thinking employed in science doesn’t mix with the superstitious and unquestioningly convinced thinking of religion without some SERIOUS cognitive dissonance.

          Science are a broad subject, unless they purposely went and look for god, which they wouldn’t find, there’s like a huge load of subject that doesn’t have anything to do with god. Also your impression of religion is like, wrong lol. There’s more to religion than just praising god.

          No. That’s not being human, that’s being brainwashed and/or obedient to authority.

          See? Human ARE irrational.

      • Achyu@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        Islam used to be the forefront of scientific and mathematical discovery.

        People of all religions have contributed to scientific growth.

        The average religious person and the person discovering scientific/mathematical stuff are generally different tho.
        Universal basic education has gained focus in many parts of the world, only relatively recently.

        I think improved scientific temper would obviously clash with many mainstresm religions.

        Presence of some supreme creator may not be proven or disproven, but I think the anti-evolution stuff and similar things in most mainstream religions would face more questions when scientific temper improves.

        And I’m not saying that non-religious people are safe from similar stuff too. Just that it is easily spread and maintained when you have a community on it.

        • Pandantic@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Presence of some supreme creator may not be proven or disproven, but I think most of the anti-evolution stuff and similar things in most mainstream religions would face more questions when scientific temper improves.

          And religions can evolve with this (or die from declining membership), as long as the leaders don’t stick to the “These actually scientifically proven facts are lies sent by the Devil” line.

      • kellenoffdagrid❓️@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        12 days ago

        Thank you, I think people often overlook how faith and scientific thought can be complimentary. In any case, for questions of religious/spiritual matters, people are basically just running with a hypothesis that works for them. As long as they’re capable of being self-critical and aren’t pushing their beliefs on people who aren’t interested, then it seems fine to me.

  • MilitantVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 days ago

    One popular answer is that sometimes people just experience things that they find scientific answers to not be able to answer adequately. We as a species are still far from knowing everything.

  • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Humans psyche is a meaning inference recursive engine, semiotically I mean, following Charles Sanders Peirce’s Theory of Signs, it generates meaning and thus needs a story to explain it, or simply to tell itself.

    The story doesn’t need to hold sound logic or any objectivity true to reality, it only needs to convey the meaning that it generated so that the mind can believe it more than questioning its validity.

    Long story short, humans really likes being told and believing stories, and often they are the ones telling the story right to themselves.

  • Limonene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    The existence of one or more gods can’t be conclusively proven or disproven. So it makes sense to me that some people believe in it and others don’t.

  • Metawish@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 days ago

    I, for real, want to know if there are any religious/spiritual people here commenting because yikes. I think a lot of people also interpreted your question to be about organized religion, and specifically christianity of the US variety. Please seek out other religious thoughts - I’ve found much Jewish thought on religion to be of interest. For myself, I’m not christian and not Jewish.

    I’m religious because growing up, I adopted the values of the religion I was taught - values of kindness, openness, and inclusion. It’s as core a part of my being as my ways of cooking or socializing. To not be religious would feel like hiding parts of myself.

    The routine of following the practices, as well as religion/spirituality being able to help us face the unknown we still have in our lives. It can provide internal strength and belief in our ability. I also find the routine a way to connect to my family, my culture, and to my day-to-day. My religious time is more a time of internal reflection on my own actions and if they align with my values. Do folks without a routine religious/spiritual practice do the same?

    The community aspect some touched on is huge. I read a book, Palaces for the People, where it mentioned that those with strong social connections fare better in times of crisis. While there are institutions that are getting to the same influence of religious institutions, they are still far less impactful.

    I guess this is all less a belief and more why do people still engage with religion. But why do we believe, what is the act of believing? I don’t have to believe that the sun will rise every morning, but, I do still believe it will rise every morning. Belief is a whole area of study alone I’m sure.