• ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    I killed my Spotify account when they started shoveling millions of dollars at Joe Rogan, and everything they’ve done since then only confirms I made the right call.

    • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Me too. Migrating to Tidal was extremely easy. They even imported my Spotify playlists and follows. And they are cheaper. Fuck Spotify.

      • spikespaz@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Actually it wasn’t easy, they rely on a third party service that charges the customer instead of Tidal footing that bill for you. I thought that was a bit tacky.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I may have to try that again: at the time I got too many complaints from my kids. Now Spotify hugely increased prices, probably to pay for its attempt to collect Podcasts that I’m not interested in.

      Unfortunately I agreed with my kids: other music services just don’t works as well

      • Getting6409@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Tidal has been pretty good for me over the past 5 years. I don’t know what your criteria are, but for me it’s something like 1) is the catalog big enough to offer 90% of what I’m looking for and 2) no advertising if I’m paying for the service. It ticks those boxes. I imagine it’s only a matter of time until they introduce the bullshit tier where you’re paying and being advertised to, but for now you get what you pay for.

        • AA5B@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago
          1. My teens like it

          2. I can predictably ask for either an artist or “like an artist” and get hours of what I asked for. (Apple just segued into random stuff so I always had to get it back on track. Someone I want listen to specifically someone do if I ask for that I expect to get that)

          • Getting6409@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            for that I expect to get that)

            Only thing I can say on 3 is the interface is pretty not bad. I’ve never quite liked it, but it has never really gotten in the way. I only recently started trying the track/artist mix. Also can say it’s okay. I’ve actually found a few gems over a few weeks of usage, but at the same time I have found times where it’s time to skip to the next track, though this is mostly due to personal taste and not because it’s throwing some really out of character into the playlist.

  • Infernal_pizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I might get a bit of hate for this considering the community name, but Spotify is the one subscription I pay for and don’t feel like I’m getting ripped off. Basically every song I want is on there, they very rarely remove content, and the algorithm actually comes up with decent recommendations. I even like some of the other random features like Spotify wrapped.

    But the main difference I see vs other subscriptions is that I don’t feel locked in, since there are no Spotify originals etc if they ever make the service too shit (which admittedly they might since they keep raising the price and trying to shove podcasts down everyone’s throat) I could easily switch to a different streaming service or even go back to just buying music outright

    • embed_me@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I used to like Spotify. Right now YT music feels just way better. No fluff yet, just music. Plus all of the unofficial covers which are on YT are on YT music

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        YT music does have a problem with reuploaders stealing revenue through “topics”, Upper Echelon made a video about it a few weeks ago

    • Brocon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m with you on that one. Yeah they are not great. But there are far worse companys.

    • Specal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I like Spotify, and when I want to support and artist I buy their merch, or I go see them live (the amount of money they get from ticket sales depends on if it’s a live nation event or not).

    • MostRegularPeople@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I have Tidal. It costs the same as Spotify but pays artists more and actively promotes up and coming musicians. Also they aren’t part of the military industrial complex, so that’s cool.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Same, Tidal also has better sound quality and a shuffle that actually works

    • Lightfire228@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I just started using Spotify for the first time last year, mainly because I got tired of trying to figure out what this meat paste wanted to listen to

      YT is great when you know what you want to hear, but it’s garbage at (music) recommendations (I haven’t tried YT music)

      Spoofie isn’t the best, but for right now, it’s worth the price just so I can actually get back to work, and not fiddle with YT for 3 hours looking for music this meat paste wants right now

      Although, I’m open to alternatives, if they’re viable

  • Faresh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m so confused by people under this post defending a company’s scheme to make more money that disproportionately affects disabled people.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    damn thats crazy, i’m out here with my 300GB collection of music that i own and control and i can just, add lyrics to shit if i want to.

    I don’t because i’m not deaf and i don’t really care for lyrics all that much, but it’s also just, automated.

  • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I didn’t even know they did that, Glad I don’t have an account with them. I’m partially deaf, most music I can’t understand what someone singing. Those fun things people do of like “most common misheard lyrics” is basically my life. On the plus side I enjoy music from around the world because unintelligible music is unintelligible no matter where it’s from. They’re very few artists I feel like I can understand, and realistically I’m probably wrong.

    In real life, I read lips to help augment my terrible hearing. Fun fact during the mask man dates during COVID, was probably the worst time for me. A lot of people I could hear talking as I could hear noise but I could not make out what it was. Leading to a lot of awkward conversations.

    Anyhoo, that’s all to say that for music that I do like I do have to see the lyrics. It’s what converts the noise into words.

    So, fuck you Spotify, My life’s difficult enough already, I’m not paying your shitty service so you can charge me for my impairment.

    • Woht24@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Everyone is going on about this as anti disability, but why does a disability entitle you to a service that’s paid?

      Unpaid Spotify sucks, full stop, no matter what part of you works or doesn’t.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I would say, it because the lyrics aren’t something Spotify made. No one’s picking up Spotify because only Spotify has lyrics. Spotify isn’t writing the songs. Regardless of what someone might think of Spotify or Spotify free, it’s withholding something that they have that they didn’t make from people that perhaps need it. It’d be like if broadcast TV or any on demand video service (YouTube, Disney, Netflix, etc.), said hey you didn’t pay no more closed captions for you (where a free version is applicable, of course).

        If Spotify wants to put stuff behind a paywall it can be features of the platform.

        My personal opinion is Spotify sucks, full stop. The CEO is a real piece of work. This just goes on the pile of reason Spotify sucks.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        They’re lyrics, intentionally making the service worse for people with hearing disabilities is ableist.

  • DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    While I agree that this is stupid, why would a deaf person be using Spotify in the first place?

    • MagnyusG@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Deafness isn’t binary, they could be capable of hearing the music but not making out the lyrics.

      • Phegan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        As someone who is not deaf, this was a really helpful comment to help me understand, thank you.

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          To everyone else reading down here, lot of people also don’t really get this same idea with visual impairment and other handicaps.

          There are a lot of people who are legally blind, but that just means they can’t make out things at certain distances, and these are why we need things like high-visibility curbs and street markers and large-type text options and other accessibility features that able-bodied people in a wide field of industries often forget about and just assume either people are blind and won’t be using their products, or will have perfect vision. When really there are far more people who are considered deaf or blind who can still enjoy many of the same things as someone with fully faculties and just need a little extra help.

          I am only typing this out because we seem to entering a strange time in the developed world where more and more people are withdrawing from the social contract and not extending compassion towards others, particularly those with special needs.

          When I was little I thought the future would be a bright and remarkable place where people took care of each other, because those were the messages you see on PBS shows like Mr Rogers and Sesame Street. Turns out, a LOT of people didn’t watch those shows.

          • Anvil Lavigne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            as someone who seems to simultaneously be sensitive to sound & hard of hearing + sharp-eyed & near-sighted, i’d like to thank you for this response.

            e : visual snow is a binch, also.

      • laverabe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Just to clarify definitions that probably wouldn’t be considered deafness, it would be an audio processing disorder. Ability to hear music but inability to process the words.

        Deafness is “binary” in that it just means ones ability to hear sound or not. If you can hear sound even slightly then you just have a hearing impairment and are not deaf.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          No it really isn’t. The hard of hearing are considered deaf. There’s complete deafness, much like there’s complete blindness, but the fact that you’re calling it hearing impairment instead of hard of hearing indicates you aren’t as well versed in Deafness (not to be confused with deafness) as you think

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            Similar to blindness which also isn’t an absolute yes or no. People can be blind and still see colors and shapes, but not enough to be able to tell what they are.

    • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      So I’m not deaf, not in the slightest, but I struggle to understand lyrics in music. I love music, I live and breathe it and I’m gonna dedicate my life to it, but I’ve always struggled with understanding lyrics in music. To me, the vocalist is just another instrument in the mix. Having lyrics to read helps me appreciate my favorite tunes more!

      • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You might have a smidge of Speech Auditory* Processing Disorder. I do and that’s what it’s like for me. Common comorbidity with ADHD and ASD, and possibly other neurotypes.

        • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Oh almost certainly. I have ADHD, prolly autistic, and I’ve had many times where my mind stopped processing what people are saying. Which is bad when you work tourism xD

          • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yyuup. It’s bad in basically any job you have to listen to people during, and I always have to establish with friends that it is an honest mistake when I can’t understand them and/or spaced out.

            I’m ADHD and on the spectrum more than likely, and my therapist says that the cutting edge research pertaining to this is leaning towards combining ADHD and ASD into one conglomerate of symptoms because they overlap more often than not.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        For me it is certain singers that apparently everyone else understands but I cannot without knowing the words ahead of time. Not just mumbling, some voices just don’t register clearly for me if I don’t know what they are saying.

        • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          It can depend on the mixing, too. Not just in regards to volume, but also in how the vocals are edited. My recent obsession has been Dusk at Cubist Castle, shit’s absolutely amazing. The way a lot of the vocals are mixed and processed are super cool, like layering the same lines over themselves five times over with subtle delays and panning, it sounds real cool! But it makes it sound a lot more distant to me as a result.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yeah, thst is true. But I’m talking about some popular artists like Pearl Jam and Mase who everyone around me apparently could hear clear as day but I just heard mumble mush at first and could only hear the words clearly with printed lyrics in front of me.

    • eskimofry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Long shot guess: deaf person can “listen” to vibrations of music with their hands on a speaker but this is not possible with lyrics?

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        So imagine you’re listening to rap. But you’re hard of hearing. The beats still slap, but the words aren’t intelligible. Hell the beats are even better because you got a subwoofer that shakes the floor. But you know it’s poetry, it’s about the words as much as the beats. So of course you’d want to read along

    • alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Seems like they could just Google the lyrics and read that.

      But I guess Spotify lyrics do give an idea on the pace of the song.

    • thatsTheCatch@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Deafness covers a broad spectrum of hearing difficulty, not just completely deaf. Most people that identify as deaf still have some hearing. I always forget that and had the same question as you until I read a comment further down.

      It’s likely that the person isn’t fully deaf and so can still hear some music, but deaf enough that they can’t understand the lyrics. Having the ability to view the lyrics in real time is handy rather than having to search them up all the time. Spotify also shows what lyric is currently being sung in real time, whereas you can’t get that with a Google search.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Agreed.

    I spent the last month converting all of my Spotify likes to MP3 files and ended my subscription in Mid-June.

    Their greedy, shrinkflating, enshittifying asshole CEO can go fuck himself.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well, I’m not advising that you do this, but I’ve read that there are tools on the Internet for converting Youtube links into MP3 files, and even better, I’ve read that the quality is a jump up from what Spotify streams to your device.

        Interesting reading.

          • Emerald@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            0 dollars and 0 cents

            How much did the artists get when you streamed the music?

            Maybe a couple cents. Not that much different

  • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I guess deaf people aren’t allowed to enjoy music like the rest of y’all.

    I’m so sorry but this is the absolute funniest shit I have ever read. 😂

    • lenz@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Being deaf is a spectrum. There are plenty of people who still have some hearing, and are “hard of hearing”. There’s deaf people who can enjoy music through the use of hearing aids as well. There’s also totally deaf people who can enjoy music because of the vibrations. There’s people whose hearing is just bad enough that they don’t understand what anyone is saying without subtitles/lyrics. Deaf in only one ear, etc.

        • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah it’s a whole spectrum. I hear normally out of my right ear but left is at best 50% volume. Just genetics my cousins have similar hearing profiles. If I listen to music with just the right ear I feel like I’m missing out even though I can barely tell what goes on in left ear outside of bass and drums.

    • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m thinking it’s not Spotify that is keeping deaf people from enjoying music, but fuck the subscriptions also.

    • zarkony@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I agree, but unfortunately, there’s probably not a good self hosted solution to this specific problem.

      I use musicbrainz for music tagging, which is an excellent source for all metadata except lyrics. For better or worse, the only decent sources of lyrics seems to be genius and musixmatch, and neither integrate well with tagging tools like musicbrainz Picard.

      If anyone else has found an easier way to do this, I would love to hear it.

      • EndHD@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m not sure if the application is safe. It may be malicious. Proceed at your own risk.

        I saw a GitHub project called 163MusicLyrics that’s sources the information from Chinese sources (NetEase and QQ).

        The entire software is in Chinese, but the results looked really accurate from the sandbox I ran. It’s even actively developed with v6.2 releasing least week. But again, I don’t know if it’s safe.

        I’m not good at code but it looks like it’s OSS, so you could verify the code yourself or reverse engineer something with the API calls they use?

        Let me know if you come across something though. I’m also looking for a way to get LRC files easily.

        EDIT: Also for self hosting, I use Jellyfin with Symfonium, and Tailscale. It works great for me and has been relatively low maintenance.

    • _g_be@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Coming from the age of ipods and piracy, Spotify was a great alternative to that and reasonably priced for the usage you could get out of it. These days is harder to justify

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      they would have a livable wage if they weren’t so fucking bad at business.

      They literally outsource the one part of the music industry that makes money publishing

      The ONLY source of revenue they have is from subscriptions, and literally all it does is pay the publishers that use spotifys platform. And also VC but that doesn’t count since it’s VC.

  • Alchalide@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’ll take youtube music revanced. Installed more than a year ago, never updated since then. Logged in with Google account and still works fine.