• What083329420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Personal politics, what age do they live in? Gender neutral has been the norm for quite some time. Females are welcome to exist, both as users and as developers.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      As a non-native speaker, I really have a lot of problems using a plural word as singular. When I read it, I always have to read twice to check whether one or more people are meant. I rather read and use “she/he” even with the additional typing.

      • iltg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        you don’t understand the language and thus everyone should comply with you? i’d rather read correct english than what you find more understandable

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You obviously understand English to a lesser degree than me. I nowhere wrote that I made demands to comply with me. Where on earth do you get that idea that offering a perspective is a demand?

      • nantsuu@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Some people don’t identify as either of those. And there already is a common word that can be used for either singular or plural, which is “you.”

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          And English is imprecise for “you” as well. For he/she/it grammar at least doesn’t change. Substitute that pronoun for they and suddenly the grammar switches to plural. That totally confuses me.

          • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            “They” can quite happily function as singular. I asked my friend about this and they gave me their opinion. They told me that they use “they” or “them” to discuss people when their biological sex is unimportant or unknown. I would like to ask them more but they have to leave. They tell me that they’ll be back later.

            They (singular) say something. He/she/it says something. They (all) say something. You (all) say something. I say something. You (singular) say something. You’ll notice “he/she/it” seems to be the irregular outlier here. English is strange.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah without the singular they your English is bad. Sucks for non native speakers but it’s how our language works.

              • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Yeah - that’s probably all true. Most people seem to cope with “you singular” and “you plural” in English but struggle with “they/them singular” and “they/them plural”. I’m not sure why.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              “He goes”. Correct.

              “She goes.” Correct.

              “It goes.” Correct.

              “They goes.” Wrong. And that’s just confusing for people who never ever were taught that in any form of education. I know it’s an old construct and not a new innovation but for people like me it feels just off. It’s not malice on my part to act against different genders, I’m just explaining why that part of the English language is weird

              • sgnl@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                It’s not wrong, it’s just generally offensive since colloquially “it” refers to objects rather than a individual.

                And as it follows, “it” is used as a insulting term when people want to dehumanize something.

                • woelkchen@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  “I goes”. Incorrect “They goes”. Incorrect

                  You don’t understand that one is first person singular and the other is not? Is your basic English really so much worse than mine?

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      The issue is 3 years old, I honestly dont know why it is being dredged up again. I also dont know why any of this matters, use something else if you care about the dev beliefs some years ago.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Because trolls have nothing better to do.

        e: truth hurts, trolls

      • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        The Ladybird browser, which is highly related to this project, just did a PR event yesterday. That’s why it’s coming up years later, right after people were alerted to the project and it got more scrutiny. I appreciate knowing about this, as opposed to not knowing about it. It gives me the chance to evaluate whether I want to dedicate energy into supporting a browser primarily being developed by a sexist who thinks not being a cis male == politics.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Primarily being developed by someone who was most likely a sexist, three years ago, and who is now being dogpiled by people who probably weren’t ever going to use his software anyway.

          If anyone really cared about this, they should just fork the code and start their own inclusive version. Literally steal the asshat’s project out from under him. Instead, everyone is coming out of the woodwork to try and score asinine dunks on the dev’s shitty opinion.

          • TechnicallyColors@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            For me personally, this is just the straw that broke the camel’s back. I’m not a fan of the languages it’s written in, its license, its immaturity, and that it’s mostly being developed by one person. Additional minor strike for communicating through discord. Now we learn that the most influential person on the project has some real bad vibes and it’s probably best to give this a pass as a whole.

            In my eyes the whole selling point of the browser is being an independent underdog with a clean slate, but what’s the point if we’re starting with a list of IOUs for things that are already bad out of the gate.

      • Amanda@aggregatet.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        You joke but I realised I feel exactly the same about this as I do about the choice of C++, which is: deep sigh ok sure