If anything, cannabis seems like a much better (and more profitable) drug around which to build a leisurely establishment.

  • Gerula@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    No it wouldn’t. I’m sick and tired of the childish argument that if we accept alcohol then we have to accept or introduce other substance abuses because some find it more appealing.

    • Solo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why shouldn’t we accept it? Its already poven to be better for you than alcohol, many people enjoy it, and a lot less deaths per year will be caused by wee than alcohol. Should people who don’t want to drink not be allowed to have a place they can hang out similar to a bar?

      • Gerula@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Here we go again. People who don’t want to drink alcohol can hang anywhere and still don’t drink acohol. The unwillingness to drink alcohol or that “many people like it” are not actual arguments to introduce and use other health damaging substances rerdless of their nature and effects.

        • randon31415@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I just want constancy. Weed is less dangerous than alcohol. Ban both, legalize both, legalize weed but not alcohol, or keep things the way they are and drop the premise that it has anything to do with health and safety.

          • Gerula@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That “less dangerous” is so subjective and unfounded that I’m not going to address.

            On the other hand do you think it’s a good idea to think in extremes? Alcohol is rooted in our culture since literally thousands of years to get it out is almost impossible now but we can struggle for moderation. Weed as we find it on the market didn’t even exist 100 years ago. So maybe it’s a good idea to introduce it get it common as alcohol so in 50 years we will have the problems with alcohol and with weed on top. Smart.

            Then we can go further to other drugs because we cant leave them outside. We have to be consistent and some people really like it.

  • zepheriths@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The issue is that a lot of people that smoke weed in place would reak. I don’t think many people would enjoy the smell

    • Solo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m sick of alcohol users smelling like ass. If you don’t drink then the smell of alcohol on someone’s breath is absolutely nauseating.

  • Pat12@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The difference is you can’t taste other people’s alcohol but you can smell others’ smoke

    • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Dry vaporizers (with temperature below 200C) don’t have smoke so are a lot less offensive with smell, if not odorless particularly with access to fresh air.

      Also people smelling of alcohol, particularly if they are drunk or drinking liquor, is definitely a thing. Also barfing. I wouldn’t doubt bars having bad smells sometimes.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yep that’s the 21st Century way to party. Smoking tastes almost disgusting after making the switch.

        Bars could have bar-top vape systems and you could bring your own plant materials or buy there, but you would probably have to buy a disposable nozzle for the vape systems. Each patron could use a clean disposable tip for their visit to minimize germs.

        • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Depending on the the vaporizer tech, I could see BYOB (and a bit of auto-cleaning) being a thing. Meaning bag, bowl, or…

          Also personally I have my own mini-“pipe” that I carved, the balloon bag slots into it and it has a carb hole for air-mixing (also it can fit the direct draw/whip mouthpiece into it too, diff orientation). So it’s a personal mouthpiece.

    • zeppo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      People who are going to a place to smoke typically wouldn’t mind that. Take cigar or vape lounges, for instance. Also it’s usually people who don’t smoke weed who act like the smell of weed bothers them.

      • Pat12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        right but my point is if a group of friends want to go to a bar and some people don’t smoke or like the smell of smoke then there is a problem, it’s not like they can just opt not to smell smoke

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Then don’t go to a weed bar, I guess. Laws are unlikely to allow weed and alcohol in the same place any time soon… though that already happens illegally at concerts and many bars I’ve been to. But people at the bars usually smoke outside. Colorado gov’t acts like all hell would break loose if people smoke and drink at the same time.

        • JickleMithers@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          …that’s why you would only go to a place like that if everyone is down. Having them for people that want to go is fine, no one is forced to go.

          • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            That sounds nice in theory, but in reality the result is usually that if the majority of a group smokes, the nonsmokers don’t have much of a choice except for looking for new friends. That was a very common complaint when smoking in pubs and restaurants was still legal here.

            • JickleMithers@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Just because one person doesn’t want to go to something doesn’t mean they shouldn’t exist. You’re basically saying one person’s opinion/choice outweighs an entire group. If those choices constantly put you at odds with the group it might be best to find a group that aligns with your values more. There’s also nothing wrong with being friends with the people that want to go to things you don’t like, just tag along when they do things you do like. You also don’t have to have one set of friends, you can have multiple groups that like to do different things. I’m not pro banning things for the sake of others that can choose not to participate.

              • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                That line of arguing is exactly why it doesn’t work. And in general I agree that banning things because someone else doesn’t like it is wrong, getting rid of smoking wherever possible is better for everyone, including the smokers.

                For what it’s worth, pretty much everyone here in Austria agrees that the ban on smoking in indoor establishments was a good thing. It’s just so much better to come home from a night out and not reek like smoke so badly that everything you touch will smell for days.

            • Cannacheques@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Well if low THC vapes and flower carts become common enough, we could see it become much more socially acceptable over time.

              The problem is how to shift public perception of it as an anti-social behaviour towards a more acceptable vice that doesn’t necessarily have to affect others good time

    • Noggindrill@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      there are THC drinks where I live, always a nice option for me to have at gatherings as a non-alcohol person.

      • crib@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Some establishments yes, but in most places I would not smell alcohol unless someone spilled it all over the floor. It’s anyway much less compared to smoke that will stick to your clothes

    • pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Right but you can consume cannabis in tons of different ways - cookies, cocktails, etc. Restaurants had smoking areas for decades with far worse air filtration systems.

    • dystop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Edibles might make it better. But then you’ll need to give people something to do for an hour or so before it kicks in…

  • query@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    If they replaced individual bars rather than expanded the space where drug consumption is the basis of socializing.

    • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t smoke weed, but phrasing it’s usage as “drug consumption” always annoyed me. It makes it sound like it’s the same thing as heroin or meth, which it’s not even close to the same thing.

        • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          It isn’t. And when people say “drugs” they’re almost never talking about alcohol anyway, unless the conversation is literally about the designation of what constitutes a drug and what doesn’t, which is convoluted as heck.

            • justhach@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yep. I can’t stand this “oh, weed is harnless” attitude a lot of people have towards cannabis. Its an intoxicant like any other, and should be treated as such.

              The amount of friends I have who think that they’re fine to smoke and drive are too damn high.

      • kestrel7@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Heroin, amphetamines, alcohol, and cannabis all have genuine medicinal uses, and also all can be abused depending on context. Drug consumption is a fine, value-neutral term, which can refer to both their use and abuse.

        • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          The war on drugs generation has had that reality tainted though mate. There are a lot of (mostly ultra conservative religious types) people who see drug use as the same whether it be meth or weed. And they don’t see beer the same way usually.

          But in a very literal sense you’re absolutely correct. But we’re having a conversation about perception here.

          • kestrel7@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            people who see drug use as the same whether it be meth or weed.

            But they are correct about this part, there is no ethical or moral difference between using amphetamines and using cannabis.

            And they don’t see beer the same way usually.

            Well, they’re incorrect about that part. But I’m not going to change the way I talk just because other people are wrong. Think about it: I’d never stop changing the way I talk.

            But we’re having a conversation about perception here.

            Absolutely.

            I worked as a chemical dependency counselor for years with all types of addicts. To me, alcohol is scarier than all of them. Quitting drugs is never fun or easy, but alcohol withdrawal will kill you straight up. One cannot quit cold turkey. In my opinion, alcohol is the hardest drug yet invented, it just also happens to be more socially acceptable than the other ones. Challenging this perception is something I care about quite a bit.

  • 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I went to one in Thailand. Got to borrow a bong and play billiards and Uno and stuff, it was a real nice and comfortable little place

  • insomniac_lemon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    More friendly environment w/dry vaporizers (bag, whip, or portable/extract) so there’s no smoke (and note the lack of lasting/scented steam clouds that people hate about flavored vape pens). Also edibles and the like… but that just time-delay dosed food.

    I would say that drinking is a longer/more gradual experience so has more reason for a dedicated space. Though I guess the passable options that I mentioned could draw the experience out, but I’ve never done that so I’m not sure what that’s like compared to one-and-done/hanging-out-when-high.

    (though as others have said, it is a thing)

    • kindenough@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      One can find a ‘coffee shop’ in nearly any city in the Netherlands. The first was Mellow Yellow in Amsterdam. They opened in 1972. From that point the formula they had, (by selling the cannabis themselves instead of the 60s, dealers hanging around in a bar who would often sell hard drugs as well), spread slowly around the Netherlands into the coffee shop culture we have today. Couple of years later in '75 our government started decriminalizing soft drugs. Early 80s a tolerance policy was set up, so coffee shops were still illegal, but could go about their busyness freely if no involvement with selling hard drugs.

  • Joncash2@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    As others have said, they exist mostly as coffee shops. Honestly, with the prevalence and near ubiquity of Delta 8 across USA now, I would have thought someone would have put the effort into making coffee shops. I have no idea why they haven’t gotten around to it yet. I found one that was a coffee shop that had delta 8 for sale, but not as a single product and they wouldn’t let me eat it in store…