• xthexder@l.sw0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The problem is that property value of homes has nothing to do with cost of building out city services. In many areas the value of homes is going up much faster than the cost of maintaining the roads and services around them.

    Property taxes should be tied to things like acreage, road access, zoning type, and the city’s budget. Not the free market value of the home, which is unrelated.

    Housing prices have gone up roughly double in the last 10 years, while inflation has only gone up 35%.

    It is extremely unfair to single homeowners to be paying for the housing demand increase, and I say this as someone who’s only able to rent. Those property taxes get passed right along to me through rent increases.

      • xthexder@l.sw0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I watched the entire linked Not Just Bikes video, but I only read the first few paragraphs of that article. Linking to a full article like that is like the opposite of TL;DR.

        I think we can agree urban sprawl is a problem. It forces a cities resources to get spread thinner and thinner as things are built out, and like your link video stated, it leaches from the downtown areas that are self-sustaining.

        In my opinion the taxes should exactly reflect the expenses such that it incentives more efficient land use. What that would actually look like from a legal sense, I’m not going to pretend I know enough to write.