I was shocked in the presidential debate that Harris gave staunch support for fracking. I was under the impression that democrats are against fracking, and remember people being critical of Fetterman for supporting it.

I also grew up in an area that was heavily impacted by the pollution from fracking. People who worked in the field were seen as failures of moral character who chose profits over the health of their children. How is it that both major parties are now in support of it? I feel like I must be missing a piece of the puzzle.

  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    The argument given back in the day was “energy independence”.

    The options (simply put) were 1) give money to shady middle eastern dictators 2) drill in ANWAR or 3) innovate in domestic production (fracking).

    Renewables were still not up to par and nuclear was not seriously considered because the carbon thing was still an afterthought.

    I’m not condoning this shit, I’m just explaining the state of play as I remember it.

    • yeather@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      User MKWT explained it fairly well. We have solved all the major issues with fracking, so now the only issue left is oil and gas releases. If we build out renewables as Kamala wants, fracking would be a non issue.