• shneancy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    you could swap the subject of criticism with “the devil” in any sentence and it would be the same though?

    “the devil (covid-19) caused a pandemic”

    “the devil (billionaires) is pushing more people into poverty”

    “the devil (adhd) is making me procrastinate doing the dishes”

    “the devil (you) has really weak criticisms of feminism, since if only he read about it, he’d realise he can see and feel the effects of the patriarchy everywhere. and the way he talks right now makes me believe he only knows the concept from strawman memes”

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      In these examples you used “the devil” as a placeholder for explainable phenomena with varying causes, none of them being unfalsifiable. Now consider the following sentence:

      “The wage gap is causes by the patriarchy” – Surely there are no complex causes being substituted by a nebulous concept here, is it?

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        the concept is only “nebulous” to people who are talking out of their asses, when they haven’t even bothered to look past the word definition and strawman memes about the patriarchy

        man, please, stop making yourself look like a fool, go read about it, it’s really not that hard