Please kindly take your grift to Reddit, Facebook, or Twitter
With AI generated articles, spam, research, images, tutorials all creating halucinations your AI generated x will be no better and will only create more untrustworthy nonsense that will only clutter the homemade communities, posts, and comments here.
Personally I’m sick of this AI crap that’s plastered everywhere like microplastics and PFAS chemicals. The cons most certainly outweighs the pros and the ‘tech panaceas’ like blockchain, nfts, and llms mostly serves to prop up the rich class.
For the 2 years I’ve been here the new fediverse feels like what Reddit used to be and should have been before the enshitification and honestly I love it here. So please stop. We don’t need a Reddit 2.0
You must log in or register to comment.
I’m just here to say I don’t want to read AI generated texts. Not even when marked as such. I prefer human to human communication. Generation quality isn’t there yet by a long shot.
Its not really generation its just summarisation of human generated text.
Assuming it’s right.
99% of the time it’s hallucinating, inventing two extra authors for the text (each with six fingers), misattributing a quote to at least one of them, and n otoriously missing the point of the article in favour of developing a more click-baity summary.
Go read the source and review the model page on huggingface and u will find thats not at all true for my implementation. The model im using provides a summary 60% identical to that of a human summary and >95% accurate in maintaining the original meaning.
Plus 99% is one hell of a an exaggeration.
Exactly. That means new thoughts and ideas can’t ever come from what is currently called Ai.
Thats not what im trying to do tho.
I get what you’re saying but so far in my experience here the vast majority of AI content is at least identified as such. AI content is here to stay and in my opinion attempts to remove/ban it will just make it more insidious. If you go back to Reddit AI posts/comments are everywhere and absolutely none of it is labeled. On lemmy people get to choose to interact with it which I think is probably way better
I disagree in that it should be allowed here just because:
“AI content is here to stay”
The reasoning for my belief is that the generation is near instantaneous in contrast to the effort that real people make to create things. The speed of creation creates an inherent problem in that it becomes near impossible to determine if that item is something worth of value to others, this causes a problem for both moderators and content consumers.
No one likes the time wastage that comes from low quality posts, comments, goods.
Time is something people can never get back.
Until the halucinations can be decreased to point where it causes no harm or is unnoticible, it will always have a more than likely negative cost to most people.
The argument that it should be allowed because it continues to exist is hard to justify in my opinion. The known and current cons are too costly to outweight the future potential pros.
Bro the only one wasting time here is you. I like AI content and come here for it.
AI doesn’t need to be “hallucinationless” to be useful. It just needs to make less mistakes than the average creator. Which isn’t that high a bar.
Time is something people can never get back.
Thats why i have written a bot to helpfully summarise human written news articles to sayve u time.
Some people have different views about AI content, you think the summarizing is useful. Others think that it is more unreliable text to filter through.
U talking about [email protected]?
Gotta love a grift published with an agpl licence. Invented it just to make money from these suckers who will buy anything with the letters AI on it.
Im not generating any articles, images, research etc. Im taking an existing article from an ecisting news source im summarising the article text using a purpise build summarisation model (the model has 60% identical output to that of a human, and >95% retention of meaning) the original article link is still posted with the summary.
The bot exists in its own community. If u dont like it block the community and/or the bot.
The complaint from op didn’t seem like they are complaining about summarizations but rather ai generated art, full articles, stories, etc.
In your case, perhaps a guilty conscience needs no accuser.Nope, they literally said it to OP earlier.
I guess they wanted a wider platform to harass someone from so they made this separate post.
In your case, you’re simply wrong.
This post reeks of Reddit 2.0 typical AI-bashing. I love AI and I’m glad this is a fun place free of corpo shills and useful idiot anprim types.
Isn’t the AI content on specific communities for that can be blocked if you don’t want to see it?
There is a debate to be had about AI generated art, which is trained on artist’s work and may not be the harmless fun people might think. AI summarising an article seems a different beast as it is merely pulling from that one piece and, while there may be questions about accuracy, it doesn’t seem as harmful. I’d, personally, want to read an article myself but it could be useful for other people. I could see an AI summarising videos being an actually useful tool.
I agree. They can fuck off back to their AI filled cave.
absolutely i mean can you believe the audacity of these so-called elites sitting in their tech-filled caves thinking they can dictate our lives and control what we say and think its beyond ridiculous and we have to push back against this nonsense because they want to keep us in the dark while they pull the strings like puppeteers but we’re not their puppets we’re not going to let them dictate our reality anymore so let’s rise up and show them that we see through their lies and we’re not going to take it any longer it’s time to take back our power and tell them to shove it where the sun don’t shine
!^(generated by GPT4)!<
Why are you even here? This is the AI cave.
Where is “here”? Since the Horde is a thing, I assume dbzer0 is mostly very friendly towards AI. The attitudes of other instances and their respective userbases vary dramatically on that, though. There are lots of people in Lemmy who are rabidly anti-AI, without much rationale going into it. See OP as reference.
Lemmy generally. I’m not making a factual statement just trying to make them feel unwelcome so they go away.
