• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This would allow for MORE apartment buildings to be built

    Only if people need housing, and if they do…what’s your alternative? Not allow them housing?

    • JGrffn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure, let’s build what we NEED to build in a conscious way, but have you seen the housing market as of late? China was printing useless buildings everywhere they could just to keep their faux market going, and any place without regulations will try to cram as many people as possible in as little space as possible, forgoing any quality of life or even safety designs in place of profitable designs.

      We love to come together in big cities, and even jobs that don’t need to be on-site end up being on-site, thus worsening the problem. There’s a ton of land out there that could be turned into sustainable housing solutions that could benefit both the people and the environment. I’m just saying we should probably consider other alternatives to “suburban hell” and “communist hell”.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think we’re anywhere close to having to even think about the possibility of developers building too much housing. And yes, regulations solve the issues you bring up, we absolutely need to enforce the ones we have and many areas need more. Soundproofing should be mandatory in multifamily buildings for example.