The other day I switched Linux distros, wiped disk, and somehow realised that OMEMO is a weird freaky thing and now I cannot see any message from my computer, even though I have everything visible on my Conversations Android app.

I don’t want to get angry again, but… yeah, this is terrible, terrible UX. Seems like OMEMO somehow encrypts for each device differently, and now all messages are “locked”. Which is weird, because messages are still there, just “locked”.

Can I somehow import a backup from my Android app? Is there anything that can be done? My guess is that, probably not, otherwise I would have gotten a popup or something in the login process, “would you like to sync your messages?”, but nothing happened.

XMPP supremacists, please! Give me a solution! I was organizing important projects with multiple people. Getting locked out of all that information is terrible.

Otherwise, then I really feel I can see XMPP disappearing now… and for a very good reason.

  • projectmoon@forum.agnos.is
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    OMEMO by design does not allow old messages to be decrypted by a new device. However, anything going forward should sync between all XMPP clients that implement proper XEPs. The server also has to support the XEPs. But if you’re using OMEMO, then you should also already have the other XEPs required for proper messaging experience. Specifically, the XEP for syncing messages across clients is Message Carbons.

    Matrix is able to decrypt past messages on new devices, but that’s because it stores your keys (encrypted) on the server and does a bunch of funky key fetching and passing between sessions to allow message decryption from new verified sessions. OMEMO does not have this function.

    • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 days ago

      That is very sad. I’ll be migrating out of XMPP. It’s intolerable that one cannot recover messages that are still there; or that even moving from one client to another implies you lose all of your history.

      • projectmoon@forum.agnos.is
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 days ago

        @[email protected] in this case, it was designed explicitly as a security feature. It’s not uncommon for end-to-end encrypted services to have this limitation. Signal has it, for example. Only way you can keep your message history with Signal is to migrate it directly from installation to installation, and it doesn’t sync old messages when setting up the desktop client.

            • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 days ago

              Aside from that, it makes sense that it took Signal a while to get the sync feature because Signal ONLY stores messages locally. XMPP stores them on the server. I would expect to be able to access that information from anywhere. What’s the point of doing so anyway? Let me at least import the keys so I can unlock those messages. But it seems like you can’t.

            • leetnewb@beehaw.org
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              19 days ago

              Pretty sure that has been a feature for at least 2 years. It seems like a reasonable compromise.

      • kixik@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        This is a security feature. Other communication mechanisms having the keys somewhere else not owned by you is rather something I wouldn’t stand. And to me it’s unsafe that messages would be kept way long on the servers.

        On xmpp the sync happens from server to all syncing clients, and the proper XEPs need to supported in both the client and the server.

        • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 days ago

          Then losing all your project’s history, while also forcing you to stick to a single, unofficial (because there is no official) XMPP client for the rest of your life because there are no standardized multiplatform backups. I’m sorry but no.

          You may call it a feature. I call it a huge fat bug.

          • MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            This is a problem a lot of secure/private projects have tbh, they get so into the details that it’s just a miserable user experience.

      • projectmoon@forum.agnos.is
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        [email protected] it also seems that Conversations now has the ability to preserve message history when moving devices. Of course this is different than moving between clients, but it’s a step in the right direction.

        • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          I do use Signal. Everyone should have Signal for telephone contacts. But for the other stuff… I’d rather use a decentralized system.

  • glitching@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 days ago

    it’s a super-shitty experience, both on XMPP and Matrix, and you touched only on one of the aspects. and that’s not even the bad part. the bad part is nothing better is on the horizon.

    so what you gotta do is put on your big boy pants, sit down and figure this shit out. here’s where I made I misstep, let’s figure out how to do redundant backups and seamless restore accross devices. etc.

    because, this is it. there is nothing better coming, you gotta learn how to make do with the tech we have. offloading your shit to benevolent dictators and hoping everything will be fine is not a strategy,

    • unknowing8343@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 days ago

      Actually, I’ve tried DeltaChat, and it does seem to do everything right. It still needs some features, but it’s advancing fast and it’s already pretty usable, and device sync is amazing.

      • glitching@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        I run all three of those (delta on hosted IMAP servers, matrix synapse, prosody for XMPP) for various clients and each has its own issues that need work. with deltachat there is no fallback if the project stops or gets taken over or whatever. with XMPP at least you have options, this client, that client, etc. as well as decades long development. based on that, some free advice (worth what you paid for it) - don’t give up on XMPP just yet. good luck.