• Prox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Having ads in fucking movies makes a service feel cheap / lower value. But the price is staying the same, so where’s that button to cancel?

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say we crossed the Rubicon on this front decades ago, when in-person, at the theater, movies started showing actual ads and not just trailers before the movie you just paid for (and it was at the same price, of course).

      I remember the first time I experienced this in a theater. My GF was like “…the hell?” and people were fucking booing the ads. But it didn’t matter enough - the ads are still here.

      And yeah, it still annoys me.

    • Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I ended up googling cancel prime membership, and that led me to a page with a cancel button.

  • terwn43lp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    i stopped using amazøn years ago. shop local & stop killing the economy. it’s just gonna get worse the more money you give them

    • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree but I can’t really afford to. My local hardware store is great but their prices are higher than big box hardware stores or amazon on many items. For example I replaced an outdoor GFCI outlet that cost $25 local or $18 from big box hardware or amazon. The outlet cover was $10 local or $5 anazon.

      • Kerensky1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the same where I live. Do I shop local and spend 2-5 times more for the item or buy it from lowes or Walmart? The kicker is that it is sometimes even the exact same brand and model item.

    • JoeHill@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Should I shop at the Target, Wal-Mart or the CVS instead?

      There are no “local” stores near me. Just massive corporations who treat their employees like shit. Costco is the exception to the treating-their-employees-like-shit rule, but sometimes I don’t need a lifetime supply of an item.

      • WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, those behemoths all share responsibility for killing the mom and pop stores. It’s not impossible to shop around to local variants. But probably the best solution is to learn how to kick the habit that American culture has foisted upon us all of buying endless piles of useless crap.

        I cancelled my prime subscription years ago. I occassionally restart it for a month at a time if I need some esoteric hobby thing and I would be forced into paying for shipping or for prime. Then I’ll watch some stuff on their streaming service. Last time I used it, it was awful. Half of the shows were gatekept behind some ad system. And the “Amazon Originals” are all just extraordinarily expensive shows with terrible writing. Uhg. I am making it a point to not have an active prime subscription when Christmas rolls around. We (the collective we, as in, humanity) don’t need more garbage.

        • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thats a lot of words to ignore the comment you’re replying to.

          All those stores sell neccessities as well as junk, so distilling it down to simply not buying junk is reductive and dismissive. If someone needs clothes and Walmart and Target are the only places available, are they supposed to go nude? Additionally, you’re literally ignoring that they said that there are not local options available to them.

          Nome of what you said is particularly untrue, it’s just completely ignoring the comment you replied to.

          • Prophet Zarquon@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah, where my Mom lives, the food options are:

            • Walmart
            • An erratically pricey local grocery, that rents its building (which has a leaky roof, requiring them to move product when it rains)
            • Dollar General
            • A farmer’s market that’s open once a week for a few hours before the afternoon heat, a few months a year, if no events have pre-empted it, having an inventory of which about 30% is bulk-bought supermarket produce with the labels (sometimes) removed
            • A 90 minute drive; no trains, no buses (literally, no buses) to the next largest town

            And she lives in a town people drive to, to get food, clothes, medicine, etc.

            She gets as much as she can from the local grocer, for whatever that’s worth; the inventory is frequently poor, & about on-par with Dollar General so far as brand-representation, goes. When tourists ask if the store has something, they get pointed to Walmart.

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is bad for everyone. I’m still a Prime Member for shopping etc., but thats really got to be reconsidered now too.

  • BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    More I see stuff like this the more I believe that these services really aren’t making any money and its all smokescreen.

    Though this could also just be investors trying to drive up profits instead.

    • RaineV1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The latter really wouldn’t surprise me. A service could be making four times the investment in profit and many investors will still push to get a few more cents out of it at any cost.

    • DharkStare@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It was awhile ago but I read that a lot of streaming services don’t make a profit and I can understand the logic. With ads, there is a direct link between a show and it’s profits. The more people watch a show, the more people see the ads, the more a company can charge for ads on that show. Without ads it becomes difficult. It doesn’t matter if 100 people watch or a million, the profits are the same.

      I feel it’s inevitable that streaming services are going to go back to ads. It’s the better business model.

  • SpeedLimit55@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So with the media industry strikes the content is already going to be crap next year. Why not also include ads with it? WTF Amazon.

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is fine with me, since clearly they’ll pass their increased profit onto their underpaid employees.

    Wait…

  • Phanatik@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to cancel my Amazon subscription but unfortunately, my entire family is using it to buy stuff off Amazon.

    • Lucifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes and people are paying unfortunately Netflix succeeded and now everyone is trying ads 😔

      • BigT54@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So I’m really confused about the whole Netflix thing. It hasn’t asked me to set a household location and the whole no password sharing thing was supposed to have taken effect back in May, right? Since May, my family has continued to use Netflix as if nothing has changed and we said if they try to charge us extra, we will cancel. Our Netflix is regularly used at 4 different “households” and they have yet to charge a fee and have not automatically set a household like they claimed they would.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This happens when you have to grow endlessly and hit a ceiling (in this case, number of users). Then you have to squeeze those users further so the numbers go up again. Of course you are killing the product in the long run because more and more users cancel but that’s not a big deal to the people making the decisions. (Well, the people doing actual work might object but nobody cares about them.) The shareholders that got obscenely rich will just leech onto the next big thing and the CEOs sail to their next product to ruin with a huge golden parachute. Rinse and repeat. Meanwhile, civilisation crumbles and decays, before it burns in the sadly inevitable climate catastrophe.

      • Borkingheck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are incorrect though. Netflix and Uber (or any ride sharing app) have shown once people are hooked they will pay the increased rate to consume the product.

      • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But Amazon crumbling isn’t civilisation crumbling… In fact, it opens doors for more small business owners.

    • cyberpunk007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think most of us pay for the shipping, the video is just a bonus. That said, their exclusives aren’t that great and they just end up in medusa.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think most of us pay for the shipping, the video is just a bonus.

        You’re not wrong, but the point though is to not reward them for bad behavior.

        It’s a death by “1,000 cuts” if you do.