• Israel soldiers say they found dead babies at a kibbutz near the Israel-Gaza border.
  • The IDF told Insider that some had been decapitated.
  • The kibbutz was attacked by Hamas on Saturday, and there was fighting there into Sunday.

A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces told Insider on Tuesday that its soldiers found the decapitated corpses of babies at Kfar Aza, a kibbutz near Gaza.

The spokesperson, Major Nir Dinar, did not say how many babies’ bodies had been found, nor how many had been beheaded.

There hasn’t been independent confirmation of what was found, though other Israeli media have reported the same claim and attributed it to soldiers.

The spokesperson told Insider: “These people are animals. They have butchered women and children in worse ways than ISIS.”

Reports started to emerge on Tuesday that Israeli soldiers had made the grisly discoveries at the self-sustaining rural community near Gaza.

The kibbutz was attacked by Hamas militants on Saturday, with fighting continuing there into Sunday.

Nicole Zedek, reporting for the Israeli news station, i24News, said: “Babies, their heads cut off, that’s what they [the soldiers] said.”

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    For anyone like myself that didn’t know what kibbutz means

    From Wiktionary;

    kibbutz (plural kibbutzim or kibbutzes)

    A community, usually an agricultural one in Israel, based on a high level of social and economical sharing, equality, direct democracy and tight social relations.

    From Hebrew קִבּוּץ‎ (kibúts), derived from the verb קָבַץ‎ (kaváts, “to gather, collect, assemble”).

    So my understanding is it’s basically like a farming village or cooperative?

    Either way, any kind of violence or atrocities going on there is horrific.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Overall, we rate i24 News Least Biased based on balanced story selection and minimal editorial bias. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to a few failed fact checks.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          As with most things, the issue isn’t binary. Factual errors are unavoidable to some degree. What is more important is how errors are dealt with (eg, are there retractions, and how visible are they), and how they interact with any editorial bias.

          There is a pretty big difference between rigorous but occasionally wrong reporting, careless reporting, and intentionally biased or misleading reporting.

          • Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Those are all great points. I’m concerned about how this specific sources (I24) stats hold up against my go-to news sources, AP, DW and Reuters on mediabiasfactcheck.com (which might have it’s own biases, but that’s a whole discussion for another day). I think the best tool we have to combat misinformation is time. War moves quickly, and so does reporting, but that leads to sloppiness. There are also bad faith actors pushing stories to get one side riled up. The longer we wait to jump to conclusions, the better information we have at our disposal. I am thinking about a specific example today about the girl whose body was reported to be paraded around naked; earlier today a story just got posted on here that she’s alive according to her mother. We will only know for sure when a neutral and reputable party verifies this in the near future.

            I really want this whole Lemmy thing to work out in the long run and I want to avoid the mistakes made on Reddit that led to witch hunts and misinformation being spread. If everyone could take one thing away from this, it’s to double check multiple sources, be skeptical about who has an agenda to push, and wait for all the information to come out.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I wonder if the folks supporting Hamas yesterday will chime in here, too.

    I mean guys, what’s a few baby decapitations in the way of oppression? De-escalation?! No, clearly decapitating babies is the righteous path. /s

    To be clear, I think Israel needs to deescalate as well.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Israeli Disinformation Force

      They are already calling Palestinians animals and dehumanizing them so this kind of accusation is going to need some 3rd party confirmation.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces told Insider on Tuesday that its soldiers found the decapitated corpses of babies at Kfar Aza, a kibbutz near Gaza.

    The spokesperson, Major Nir Dinar, did not say how many babies’ bodies had been found, nor how many had been beheaded.

    There hasn’t been independent confirmation of what was found, though other Israeli media have reported the same claim and attributed it to soldiers.

    Reports started to emerge on Tuesday that Israeli soldiers had made the grisly discoveries at the self-sustaining rural community near Gaza.

    The kibbutz was attacked by Hamas militants on Saturday, with fighting continuing there into Sunday.

    Nicole Zedek, reporting for the Israeli news station, i24News, said: “Babies, their heads cut off, that’s what they [the soldiers] said.”


    The original article contains 229 words, the summary contains 128 words. Saved 44%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!