so basically you’re getting a surveillance device shipped straight to your living room.

  • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I genuinely don’t know who would ever sign up for this. If you’re too broke to afford a TV, just watch on your phone or laptop. Nobody needs a huge screen anymore. Then there’s the number of people with ad blockers or paying a small amount per month just to get rid of ads. This just looks like a bad idea all the way from a bad VC investment to a bad job for the devs to a bad choice for the consumer. And at no point did anyone ever say “wait what are we doing again?”

    • ritswd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you’re too broke to afford a TV, just watch on your phone or laptop.

      Tell me you’ve never lived in poverty without telling me you’ve never lived in poverty.

    • fuzzzerd@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sad thing is, plenty of people will lap this up as a good thing and see it as a benefit. At least at first, until they realize they have to watch some TV based ads before they watch the ad roll on their YouTube video, followed by the second screen showing some banner ad the whole time. Yick.

      • Eggyhead@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        As if a person who can’t afford a normal TV can just buy all the things from all those ads that advertisers think they’re selling.