• monobot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    And it is always a question how they calculated handling of nuclear waste.

    There are options, we can use coal and natural gas for on demand power to fill the gaps in renewables, we don’t have to quit all at once. New ideas for energy storage and comming around, some of them might be useful for small towns, others for remote places.

    • Uranium3006@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      nuclear waste, by definition of being radioactive, is the only wast that goes away on it’s own if you leave it sit for long enough

      • Knusper@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I was considering whether this is just a shitpost, but your other comments suggest that you’re completely serious. It does not go away. Radioactive decay causes multiple transitions between radioactive elements until it ends up as lead, which does not decay further.

        Of course, it should also be said that it’s better to have no waste than waste that eventually turns into lead.
        And that it’s still better to have waste than waste which also happens to be toxic.