• kurcatovium@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Until they (every one of them) catch-up with price to ICE it’s gonna be tough. Same story with every single automotive brand we had in past decades. They thought they’re invincible, until…

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah yes those fuel subsidies keep the up front cost of vehicles so high… (sarcasm)

        Get a new one liner that’s contextually correct. Or is that the point, to be a pointless broken record.

  • Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    BEVs are a dead end. It’s an idea older than internal combustion and is already obsolete. The world needs to shift focus to concepts like e-fuels or hydrogen cars.

    • WallEx@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, quit using the efficient stuff, we need something similarly inefficient as gas powered cars.

      • Hypx@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Batteries are unsustainable and have massive resource requirements. It’s basically an obsession with “efficiency” while actually being extremely wasteful.

        • WallEx@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You say that while promoting the idea of more inefficient energy transfer systems. Electric motors operate above 90%, traditional motors around 25-30%. Trying to mitigate that with wasting more energy by creating an artificial fuel is even more wasteful.

          Burning stuff is unsustainable, using batteries, that are recyclable is not.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Solar panels are only 15-20% efficient. No one is going around saying we need to ban solar panels.

            Fuels made from solar power are the opposite of unsustainable. They are the most sustainable ideas possible. It is basically artificial photosynthesis.

            • WallEx@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Where is the comparison to the solar panel? I’m comparing methods of propelling, you are comparing solar panels and?

              If you can use the energy more efficiently and choose not to it’s not sustainable (or at least not very smart)

              • Hypx@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because it is solar power ultimately powering it all. If you don’t care about the efficiency of that step, you don’t really care about all of the later steps. It is still green energy and still cheap.

                The problem with BEVs is that while it is efficient in one respect, it is insanely wasteful in others. As a result, it is an unsustainable idea and functionally just greenwashing.

                • WallEx@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So it’s the same if you have to build 5 times as many solar panels to do the same thing? It’s just not.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              We don’t make fuels from solar power.

              Unless you mean hydrogen, which by itself is already 30-40% less efficient then just using the electricity directly in a battery.

              And that is without counting all the hydrogen that just escapes through any form of containment we try to keep it in.

              • Hypx@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hydrogen is a fuel. E-fuels are hydrogen plus CO₂ and converted into synthetic hydrocarbons.

                You are blatantly ignoring the part where solar power is incredibly inefficient to begin with, and we don’t care. It’s still cheap energy.

                • PlatinumSf@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re confusing the efficency of solar panels with the efficiency of burning hydrocarbon based fuel (perhaps intentionally?). Yes, solar panels convert about 20-30% (they’re getting better with time) of the energy provided by mankind’s closest and most beloved fission reactor into energy we can use, the rest being reflected or turned into heat, but the source (that giant ball of fission) is infinite and non-detremental to the environment to keep running. Hydrocarbon production not only requires this original source but once calculated would provided you end delivery efficency levels that are dramatically lower (likely less than 1%), Natural hydrocarbons are limited in supply, and the whole chain is significantly more toxic for the planet when you calculate in byproducts produced during production or consumption. It’s legitimately not even close and if you truly believe hydrocarbons are even remotely viable you’ve misinterpreted one of the data points somewhere in your calculation.

        • You999@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The problem with fuels made from electricity is that pesky thing called thermodynamics. If an efuel was developed that was more efficient than electricity then we’d be able to use it to produce more electricity than we put in.

          • Hypx@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You avoid the giant, expensive battery though. People are obsessed with efficiency in a self-defeating way.

            • You999@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              People are obsessed with efficiency because it’s the only metric that matters. We have a finite amount of resources on this planet and efficiency is the only way we can make it last. If you aren’t a ‘save the planet’ type of person then efficiency still matters because it’s directly correlated with cost.

                • You999@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You are comparing different efficiencies. Solar panels are 15% to 20% efficient at converting light into energy. As far as I’m aware every Efuel being developed (and every hydrocarbon fuel for that matter) has a 0% efficiency at converting light into energy but if I am mistaken please do correct me.

      • EnderMB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Europe is a huge continent. What do you mean, exactly?

        The UK is in Europe, and in many cities here the public transport options are terrible, with driving being the only safe option, as cycling is very dangerous on our roads.

        There are also huge parts of France, Italy, and Germany where public transport is poor, expensive, or infrequent.

  • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    All the people vehemently defending ICE in this thread are missing the point.

    All the expensive maintenance/problems with my current ICE are with things that do NOT exist on a BEV:

    • head gasket
    • timing belt
    • catalytic converter
    • oil change

    Also, the scumbag dealer straight up LIED because I specifically asked about the common head gasket issues with Subaru and they assured me that they had been fixed, and then proceeded to sell me a car with the exact engine which had that issue even though the same model year had started shipping with a new engine that didn’t have the problem.

    So I do NOT give a SINGLE fuck about the environmental tradeoffs between lithium extraction and all the dirty fluids involved with a ICE. If you have a hard-on for breathing smog, I won’t kink-shame you.

    In summary, I’ll be getting a BEV because:

    1. It won’t ever blow a head gasket and spew coolant and oil all over itself for no fucking reason while I’m just trying to get home from work. The battery will slowly degrade over many years, but that’s very predictable and can be planned for.

    2. It won’t ever force me to replace it because it needs a catalytic converter that costs more than the car is worth and can’t pass emissions. Again, I won’t kink shame you if you get off on breathing smog, but I also don’t believe you have the right to force that on everyone else with your bypass kits and rolling coal BS.

    3. I will NOT have to deal with lying scumbag car dealers. These middlemen add NO value to the transaction and they lobby to force the state governments to keep them involved.

    4. I’ll never have to go with a gas station and deal with their bullshit gas pumps with poor usability, I can charge at night and while I WFH

    5. My car will be able to run on any fuel that can generate electricity: natural gas, nuclear, solar, wind, etc. ICE cars are dependent on a very specific nasty byproduct of petroleum refinement which is constantly price gouged for windfall profits by greedy corporations and our government just lets it happened because they are bought and paid for by the same industry, they’ll even send subsidies their way as an extra fuck-you to the taxpayer. I’ll stick with my local, municipal electric company which is held accountable to provide me electricity without padding the windfall profits of the 1%.

    6. An electric motor is a much better engineering solution to the problem of creating forward momentum than an ICE. There are some things that you need to burn a liquid fuel for, like if you’re going to try to launch a rocket. Turning a wheel is NOT one of them. Do the ICE fetishers even know how an ICE works? It’s immensely over-complicated to create an explosion and then harness the power of that explosion to create rotation, which is trivial to achieve with electricity. So many moving parts which all have to be properly lubricated and aligned or it will literally explode and spew metal and toxic chemicals everwhere. No thanks. Kids can make electric motors in science class.

    All that being said, I’m still not going to drop 3x the cost on a BEV over an ICE, the prices DO need to come down. Thankfully, with lots of options in the market it looks like they will.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is where fuel cell cars come in. They are also EVs. It pretty much renders the BEV obsolete. A lot of BEV advocacy are from people stuck in the early 2000s, totally unaware that technology has past them by. It is similar to the obsession with diesel cars.

      • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Aren’t there still immense challenges with the safe storage and transportation of hydrogen? Will I be able to generate that hydrogen from my own solar panels?

        I’m actually in agreement that FCEVs are the future, I just haven’t seen anything to convince me that those challenges have been addressed. Didn’t Toyota screw up by betting heavily on FCEVs instead of BEVs and now they have to play catch-up?

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, there are not. A lot of these concerns are from people stuck in the past, or have an agenda.

          You can generate your own hydrogen, and there are a few companies building products for that. Though realistically there will be some degree of centralization. Most people will buy hydrogen and not bother with home production.

          BEVs are really the result of subsidies and virtue signaling. It is a mandate driven by delusional pseudo-environmentalists. The same people that got nuclear banned in much of the world. It is not a serious attempt at green transportation. And it will likely die-off in favor of FCEVs or other ideas once the time comes.

          • OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            So you’re saying that the major issues with storage and transportation of hydrogen have been resolved? Do you have a source? Everything that I’ve read today is that they still can’t store it without it evaporating at a pretty high rate.

            In an abstract sense, I understand that FCEVs WILL be better once infrastructure exists and the problems with transportation and evaporation are resolved. Ideally the hydrogen would be used as energy storage for renewable sources, though my understanding is that most hydrogen produced today is produced using oil and gas.

            The reality is that I’m going to need to replace my ICE in the next year or two, and there is not currently a FCEV available for me to replace it with or infrastructure for me to fuel it. My house gets good sun, it wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to power my small amount of driving with my own solar and a BEV

            It’s not really productive to say that people who support BEV over ICE are stuck in the past. What would you recommend people do? If your answer is “buy another ICE until hydrogen is a realistic option”, isn’t that MORE stuck in the past than someone advocating for BEVs?

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              We have had hydrogen pipelines for decades, and large scale storage in the form of underground salt caverns. These things basically work the same as natural gas pipes and storage systems. The only real challenge was local storage, which has mostly ceased to be a problem with the rise of carbon fiber tanks. There are tens of thousands of FCEVs around the world, and rarely any issues with dealing with hydrogen storage.

              The main limiting factor is infrastructure, or rather lack thereof. But the difference here is that you think it is technically impossible or at very least difficult. I believe it is simply a matter of building it, which is pretty straightforward.

              BEVs also were impossible to buy for most people until around the mid-2010s. They went a century of near non-existence before then. FCEVs are simply going through a similar process. Sooner or later, they will be everywhere and BEVs will be abandoned afterwards.

              You can buy whatever you want right now. It’s not like anyone’s stopping you. The point is that BEVs are not the answer. They are just a transitional idea and won’t last.