Elon Musk, the owner of X, criticized advertisers with expletives on Wednesday at The New York Times’s DealBook Summit.

  • Mereo@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Poor Linda Yaccarino (current CEO of Twitter). She must be wondering what in the actual ### did I get myself into…

    • Endorkend@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Poor?

      She’s making bank having to do nothing and anything that runs X into the ground is easy to point at Musk.

      She has an absolutely sweet deal.

      • remotelove@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        She is still gonna get a paycheck. Why does she care what Musk does? She is just a token CEO anyway.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          She was just worried about having the title on her resume. That’s all. Fucking grandiose narcissism. No wonder her and Musk get along.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Trump supporters generally don’t ask those kind of questions of themselves. Like Trump, they like to pretend they’re always endlessly self-assured in their thoughts and actions, but that couldn’t be further from the truth.

      People shocked that she’s a fucking garbage CEO just didn’t know about her past as a garbage head of a department.

      I’m serious about the Trump supporting thing, too. She’s a Trump supporter. The fucking stupidity and doubling down on said stupidity is required for that.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s very funny that his single biggest failure is so public. Like if The Boring Company couldn’t find customers, it would just quietly shut down. Newsworthy, but only for like a day.

    This is monthly stories about severe incompetence and petulance.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Like if The Boring Company couldn’t find customers, it would just quietly shut down.

      If? Besides a few small projects have they ever scored anything significant?

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Ha I didn’t want to put this in my comment to complicate the point but no they’ve only done one actual thing so this could have happened and I don’t know that we’d know.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        There are different levels of “public”. Musk doesn’t need to publicly announce he’s telling all the advertisers to fuck off, he could tell it to them on a private call and then the public would most likely only know what advertisers are pulling out. The whole “fuck off” statement never needed to be public, Musk made it public because he can do whatever the fuck he wants. The same goes for a lot of things you see about Twitter. He didn’t need to do his things in public, he simply did.

  • firewyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Everything Disney owns needs to leave, including ABC and ESPN. Otherwise it’s all bullshit theater from them.

    • KSP Atlas@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Problem is, advertisers likely do not want to go on mastodon because they can’t advertise there

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hope the businesses who come do like the BBC and spin up their own server. I don’t want them making accounts on places like Lemmy, like reddit, where someone is having their username taken away now for ‘trademark infringement.’ Username was “FoodNetwork.”

      The fact that reddit just letting business steal fucking usernames is god damned vile.

    • Ooops@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Companies give a shit about giving us information. It’s all about the advertising, so they will flock to the next closed-source company-controlled shithole.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is he in Scientology? He’s gone off the cliff like most of them do.

      • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        There is nothing regular about what musk is doing. Most billionaires only make the news when they lay off or bust unions or something. When’s the last time bezos was in the news for Twitter trolling?

  • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    I thought this guy was supposed to be right wing? Doesn’t he like the free market? Because, I mean, the alternative is regulation. We could make antisemitism illegal, but in the west we have largely decided that we will instead rely on free market forces (read: public shaming) to root that shit out.

    It’s almost as if… and this might sound crazy, but hear me out… it’s almost as if this guy wants the advantages of capitalism, but none of its disadvantages?

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      He’s a libertarian. That means he thinks he can do whatever the fuck he wants but will squeal like a stuck pig at the slightest sign of pushback.

      • Djad2410@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        What advertisers are doing isn’t capitalism it’s collusion to manipulate the market.

          • Djad2410@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I simply made a claim to why something is happening whether or not is true is yet to be proven but that doesn’t mean it’s not a possibility. These companies want a hand in how the company is run and if they’re not getting what they want them calling each other up to coordinate an ads pull is a tool in their toolbox.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Either bring facts, or state it as an opinion, don’t try to do both or you will get called out.

              • Djad2410@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                It’s to early to state facts so it’s a given that most things mentioned this early would be opinions.

          • Djad2410@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Obviously you don’t understand capitalism and your just going off what people who want communism and socialism are saying.

              • Djad2410@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Government regulations. Capitalism is a component of the government so it should take government action to enforce it.

                • frezik@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Really? Because I’ve been repeatedly told by libertarian types (not socialists or communists) that any government regulation is not capitalism.

                  You’re free to disagree with them, but then I’m going to ask what your definition of capitalism is that assumes this regulation (not just allowing it, but mandating it).