“We don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away.”

More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis,” and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.”

  • 9point6@lemmy.worldEnglish
    153·
    9 months ago

    Okay fine, I’m never clicking on a substack link again.

    And after say a grace period of about 6 months to move elsewhere, I’m going to assume anyone associating with the service is at best a nazi sympathiser

    Go ahead, be a Nazi bar, I’m sure their money is worth it

    • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.worldEnglish
      45·
      9 months ago

      This is such a complicated feeling… On one hand, I agree. But on the other, we can’t specifically pinpoint what censorship is valid and what isn’t.

      Edit: Obviously, I’m not considering Nazis in this thought experiment.

      Edit 2: OH MY GOD PEOPLE! OF FUCKING COURSE WE SHOULD KEEP NAZIS OUT FFS! 😑

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
        3·
        9 months ago

        If you’re still hand wringing over whether or not Nazis are scum of the Earth that deserve nothing more than pure vitriol and ostracisation, you might be a Nazi.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        9 months ago

        It is only censorship when it is the government, else it is normal people not wanting to deal with Nazis.

        If you really want your white supremacists views out there just roll your own setup

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldEnglish
        31·
        9 months ago

        But on the other, we can’t specifically pinpoint what censorship is valid and what isn’t.

        Yes we can. Kicking Nazis off their platform is valid censorship. Nazis lost the right to have a seat at the table in 1945.