Thanks for your important testimony. I have come to believe that your case in is an exception but I have no means of knowing this for sure and I apologize for being triggering.
Thanks for your important testimony. I have come to believe that your case in is an exception but I have no means of knowing this for sure and I apologize for being triggering.
Yes humans, as animals, have many wild internal forces. Horrible cases of abuse (babies, infants, women) were most certainly the result of these. Such horrible stories are then (sometimes // in part) keept (in folklore // culture) and help to warn us about these internal forces.
(sorry I know I don’t have the exact words)
i believe it makes biological sense that if a women kills babies from rape, this, over many generation, would reduce rape. But again, this is something that is beyond my knowledge.
You are absolutely right and this so obvious, yet, I see that you get about 50% downVotes and those might be from people I usually block.
About smell :
“In 2021, inhalation of hexadecanal was found to reduce aggression in men but to trigger aggression in women.[4] Hexadecanal is one of the most abundant substances emitted by human babies from their heads, which may be an evolutionary survival mechanism to induce mothers to defend the baby and fathers to not attack it. But it is not yet known whether the amount of hexadecanal emitted by humans is sufficient to affect other humans.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hexadecanal
Thanks again for your time and consideration.
We are discussing here in a community dedicated to science and clearly I have to acknowledge that your arguments here are much better than mine 😆 and that you are very knowledgeable in the current paradigm of science.
Unfortunately for me, there is no community at Lemmy dedicated to the history of science where “very knowledgeable on the current paradigm” would be so telling for historians knowledgeable in this field.
Thanks for your input.
May I take another route and ask you what you know about the history of science … about paradigm shifts … and about how people very knowledgeable on the current paradigm cannot see (most of times historicaly) that a paradigm shift is about to happen ?
i cannot understand everything (far from it) but here is the part where I believe is an alternative explanation for the CMB :
Equations (2.38), (2.39), (2.40), and (2.53) all illustrate that the creation rate of particles with energies larger than the inverse expansion time, ρ, is exponentially suppressed. Parker [11] has noted that these exponential factor are similar to those which appear in thermal spectrum at finite temperature.
i only have access to the preprint :
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2112.02444.pdf
… “using 3D printing – but instead of concrete, they used sand combined with a binder.” … o.k.
… what people and organizations believe …
from 2 books (2014 & 2018) and publications made by international or governmental groups from 2017 to 2021.
85% of organizations believe AI will cause job displacement:
62% of people believe AI will eventually become more intelligent than humans:
40% of people believe AI will cause a future war between humans and machines:
39% of people believe AI will lead to a new form of slavery:
37% of people believe AI will become sentient and conscious:
This article never say by which mechanism all the riches produce by the new robot technology replacing humans might be distributed to humans,
(although it hints that’s what may happen) and so the main interpretation of this article would be the probable disparation of humanity.
Great answer, straight to the point, easy to understand for non-native English speaker
… and you also add this last part that I didn’t know.
Because they are great in pies that you can have for dessert with some ice cream or a glass of milk.
Edit :
oops : you were saying it is like a human since it does error ? maybe i “wooshed”.
Hi @werefreeatlast,
i had successes asking LLaMA 3 70B with simple specific questions …
Context : i am bad at programming and it help me at least to see how i could use a few function calls in C from Python … or simply drop Python and do it directly in C.
Like you said, i have to re-write & test … but i have a possible path forward. Clearly you know what you do on a computer but i’m not really there yet.
Years ago i was developing some programs to help me in my laboratory and i was writing some programs and wanted those program, from different process, to communicate rapidly with each other.
One way i thought would be rapid is to share a block of physical memory and I could not figure out how to do it … so instead, i used files (and/or pipes).
There are many maximums in different types of potential for human beings :
This maximum you hint about would be in terms of reproductive potential and attractiveness.
Someone closer to the developers than you are ?
infos & some criticism of the app :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life360
(also some cars have integrated tracking)
test №2 …
/ etc /passwd
/ …/etc /passwd
/ …/…/etc /passwd
(from: Android, browser, on lemmy. …world)
** I cannot post this if I remove the spaces !**
is this the starting point of a new cosmology ?
https://lemmy.world/post/17053001
Those objects fits comfortably in reality but those theories (Big Bang) do not.
source // open access:
RUBIES: Evolved Stellar Populations with Extended Formation Histories at z ∼ 7–8 in Candidate Massive Galaxies Identified with JWST/NIRSpec https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ad55f7