You ad hominem’d first lmao.

Different person

So drag somehow thinks that believing in nothing is easier than believing in proven fact?

Drag is saying that depressed people should “just believe” which is much crazier than saying depressed people should “just believe in evidence”.

People do not need to believe in what drag is saying without evidence, because that evidence exists, so they can just as easily believe in it WITH evidence.

No? I’m depressed, too.

Let me do the same stupid shit drag just did.

Is that your advice to depressed people who think life is hopeless? Belief in things without having real evidence?

My point is that drag came to the wrong conclusion.

Drag doesn’t have to explain depression to me.

If Drag understood the evidence, then it sounds like the conclusion Drag should come to is not to baselessly believe in things without evidence, but rather to make a better use of context to rid dragself of blindness caused by anecdotal evidence.

Well, the problem with this line of thinking is that we do have empirical evidence that depressed people DO get better by making a huge effort to get better.

Drag had anecdotal evidence, which is incredibly weak evidence.

Drag may have had baseless belief in something and it worked out, but my point is, the evidence WAS available to support that point.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

I guess the difference is that those of us that would argue with you would believe that you are reasonable individuals whereas, shocker, the genociders are not reasonable.

I think there is a term for this. The (insert name here) effect. You won’t leave because they’re there. They won’t leave because their audience is there.

You have less incentive to stay, really. What are you afraid of missing out on?

Do you think we’re debating you? We’re mocking you.

You seem pretty obviously upset.

What would make you think that a PC wouldn’t also be able to do this for longer? Lol.

It’s not that I can’t read, it’s that your syntax is lacking. Good edit. It helps a bit. Can still be interpreted the other way.

Ah, yes, trans rights are no longer under attack.

Are you legally brain dead?

https://translegislation.com/

Don’t think you understood the underlying point of their comment.

lol ok bud

REMINDER: THIS IS WHERE WE STARTED

MY POINT = PROVEN CORRECT

PLEASE KEEP MOVING THE GOALPOST