• 0 Posts
  • 66 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: November 30th, 2023

help-circle


  • I remember playing with a similar feature on my Galaxy S3 back in the day. Eye scrolling. The phone would scroll for you when it sensed you looking at the bottom of the screen. That was the S3. It was not perfect but very usable. My hands always felt faster so I never kept it on but it was a fun thing to play with. I’m sure the only thing stopping them is the fear of backlash. We’ll get there in time I’m sure :/



  • The phrase “hill to die on” is perfect. It’s a war term and that’s what he’s doing. Going to war against governments and companies on behalf of consumers. He just likes to record himself while he does it.

    He made a video about a real problem using recent headlines and you’re upset that everybody else is doing it? You do realize this issue is so widespread that it has an entire logo dedicated to it on consumer products. Not that anybody notices. At the very least he is bringing attention to the issue.

    I do admit though, this man loves a good rant. This all comes from someone who doesn’t really follow his career but is a fan of his work. Like you said, dude comes out of nowhere.

    Kinda unrelated but everyone should check out gray jay









  • Deello@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlFound on Wikipedia
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    4 months ago

    I remember there was a water treatment plant or something similar that got hacked. The hackers started messing with the levels of the chemical mixtures to poison an entire city. The only reason it didn’t end in catastrophe is because there was somebody watching that specific screen at the exact moment it happened. Seeing this made that scenario more terrifying.





  • Creating material that is copyright infridgement is not a desired output

    Agreed.

    the purpose of guns is to kill (when used).

    Guns is a term with varied definitions of which not all are intended to kill. There are rubber bullets, air soft, small caliber, and even paint ball guns. These MAY be lethal but were made with other goals in mind.

    Nvidia on the other hand made GPUs for applications that revolve around video, the G literally stands for graphics. Some people found out that they are also efficient at other tasks so Nvidia made a new line of products for that workload because it was more lucrative. Gamers usually only buy 1 graphics card per machine, a few years ago some would even buy up to 3. In contrast, AI researchers/architects/programmers buy as many as they can afford and constantly buy more. This has made Nvidia change their product stack to cater to the more lucrative customer.

    AI manufacturers depend on copyrighted material to “train” the AI

    With everything I said, these AI creators CHOOSE what to feed into these new tools. They can choose to input things in the public domain or even paid-licensed-content but instead using copyrighted and pirated content is the norm. That is because this is a new field and we are collectively learning where the boundaries are and what is considered acceptable and legal.

    Reddit recently signed a deal to license it’s data (user generated content like posts and comments) for use with AI generation. Other companies are using internal data to tailor their AIs to solve field-specific problems. The problem is that AI, just like guns, is a broad term.

    the method of creation makes it more likely to infridge.

    Nvidia has given us the tools but until we define what is considered acceptable, these kinds of things will be inevitable. I do believe that the authors had their copyrights infringed but they are also going after the wrong people. There have been reports of AI spitting out full books on command, clearly proving that those works were used to train. The authors should be going after the creators of those specific AIs, not Nvidia.

    There is a long and bumpy road ahead.