I’m curious why the mouth needs to be open. Probably to somehow avoid your lungs taking damage from the pressure wave?

Well that highly depends on location. I think that’s illegal in most of Europe

Or they just posted a lunch picture to their social media and somebody grabbed it and made a meme out of it. Your body doesn’t determine what intention you have when you post pictures

Since Greenland Imports a lot and doesn’t really have a lot of export, a big part of the trip would be sailed anyway, just with empty containers

Is this a tautology?

This might be it. Depending on how the sound is mixed the voice might cancel itself out since it’s usually similar between left and right and the instruments are not. So they will not experience the same interference

So where can you play this?

Need a cross post to [email protected]

Post it here as well👺

In Denmark we have a bunch of weird ones: When there isn’t a problem: “There is no cow on the ice”/ Der er ingen ko på isen

When you’re helping someone when it would be better they did it themselves you’re doing them “a bears favor” / en bjørnetjeneste

When you want it both ways but cant: “You want to blow with flour in your mouth” / blæse med mel i munden. This always made more sense to me than the english, you cant have your cake and eat it too.

When something is complete gibberish, it “sounds like volapyk” / lyder som volapyk. Volapyk is an actual made-up language like esperanto. incedentaly the same expression also exists in Esperanto

and i’m sure there is more

Generally the hope is that people naturally converge on one community and then the other would die out. Or maybe resurge if for some reason people don’t like the first

I like the point about LLMs interpolating data while humans extrapolate. I think that’s sums up a key difference in “learning”. It’s also an interesting point that we anthropomorphise ML models by using words such as learning or training, but I wonder if there are other better words to use. Fitting?

Denmark doesn’t have unrestricted free speech. Censorship is against the constitution but hate speech, inciting violence or defamation is illegal and until 2017 blasphemy was illegal. There is some legal basis for punishing speech that is bringing the country into danger or is severely insulting another nation. I am not a lawyer so I don’t know if it’s applicable or if it will hold up in court.

Note that the government does not want to ban burning books. Just prevent/punish doing it as a provocation against another country.

I also want to stress that I am not defending the Danish government or the book burners. I just want to bring some needed nuance to the discussion

Which is also what the article is arguing. As soon as a majority of users are subject to this the websites can discriminate. If only safari does this it’s still bad but not very bad

Is there some news coverage on the mali governments actions? I couldn’t find anything on my quick google search

Can someone please explain why toasters aren’t made like that anymore?? I would happily forgo the led and the obnoxious ding they make to have them make the toast perfectly every time

Don’t worry. As Danes we are always mistaken for Germans abroad, so we are used to it

The Denmark one is feddit.dk 😌