(Which is correct so there’s nothing wrong with that)

It turns into a checkmark as soon as you have the song in your playlists. For new songs, its just a plus button (at least for me)

But communist views ARE censored

And I dont think they should be censored (even though I disagree with their views). See what I mean?

You linked a definition that agreed with me, then deleted it

Ummm… ~~ I think you replied to the wrong person because as you can see, ~~ my comments are not edited and also, I didnt post a link to anything… I dont know what definition you are talking about (?) Maybe the one on the comment before (it didint change though)

Killing and enslaving should not be allowed and should be avoided at all cost.

The point is, however, if (lets say) a communist killed and enslaved people, should that mean that communist views should be censored in the future? (No! IMO)

Killing and enslaving people are terrible and unacceptable ways of pushing one’s own ideals. It does not make the actual opinion itself invalid though.

Well I dont think we can really draw a line objectively between “should be allowed” and “should be cencored”. It will always be based around one opinion (or one range of opinions but never truely objective).

Killing and enslaving are both means to do something, not the actual reason itself. If any person with a different political view wanted to do the same, it would be just as bad. Everyones opinion should be allowed.

Measuring quantun superpositions can have different outcomes under the same circumstances, right? So therefore, it cannot be deterministic (= what you described) because randomness is involved.

If you say you are right to censor your worst enemys then the Nazis were logically also right to censor the opinions of the people THEY hated the most…

Supporting only certain peoples freedom of speech is the definition of censorship…

“Freedom of expression of opinion” would be a more fitting term, as it is called in most languages. Death threads and shouting fire in a crowded theater are not opinions…

Censorship of any opinion is bad.

I was always under the impression that plants chemically convert CO2 and some other stuff to glucose (C6-H12-O6), right? In that case, the algae would still help, wouldnt they?

Arent there any monthly/yearly tickets?

Name one car-addicted person. Like, someone who has withdrawal symptoms.

Thats impossoble because a perfect systen depends on one’s morals which differ from person to person. Whats a perfect system to you may be a bad system to me.

So you’re saying every company should be owned by a single person? If two people want to start a company, it should only belong to one person? That doesnt sound right to me…

The NSA uses TOR themselves. Why would they even want it to be insecure?

TOR and VPN at once is just dumb and probably less secure than just using TOR.

The English “Yo” is a really good translation. You can use it to express surprise (“Alter! Wtf!” - “Yo! Wtf!”) or to address someone (“Alter, was geht?” - “Yo, whats up?”).

“Yo” really is the best translation I can think of.

Why, if you care to elaborate?

So you propose an anarchy? I dont think that would go well.