Two words, arranged marriage.

I heard it was because siblings shared rooms and they had two beds in the room, hence twins.

Using republican logic, God hates the border patrol.

No dates. He is still on the loose.

The fact that they sued everyone involved and not involved with this instead of offering to remove the house first tells me they probably wouldn’t accept that if she asked. This is a small tactic as others have said.

By this logic, if a person is driving and looking at their phone, runs a red light and causes an accident, they shouldn’t be held responsible if they don’t give the person reasonable compensation. It wasn’t there intent to cause an accident, it was a mistake. Asking for the property she paid for in the condition she bought it is reasonable.

You are also leaving out the part where she is now paying 10x if not more for property taxes on a house she never wanted and it sounds like the house is damaged due to squatters, something that the developer should have made sure wouldn’t happen. That house probably isn’t worth what they are offering it to her.

Also, you have no idea what she wants from a 3 minute video. All we know is what the developer offered. She may have asked for the house to be demolished and they said no because it would cost them more money to do so.

I would like to compare the number of trans people who have had an illegal relationship with a child to a straight person.

He doesn’t own them. He only donates lots of money to their causes. He doesn’t expect anything in return.

And by donate, I mean gives

And by causes, I mean their pockets.

And by expecting nothing in return, I mean expects them to do everything he asks.

Yeah, no. Your interpretation is incorrect in my opinion.

Yes, it was a baby account. Only 6 hours old. The icon next to their name is a baby. How can you punish me for something the site does as well?

Also, the English the person used did not sound like it was English as a first language.

Lastly, let’s take a look at your verbiage.

Perjorative: expressing contempt or disapproval

Calling a person a paid Russian sympathizer does not meet this definition. He was acting as if Russia is the victim in this story. I was saying what he was.

I would appreciate if when reports are made, they are actually looked at and not blindly removed.

Fine, I accept that, but what exactly did I say that caused the post to be removed? All I said was he was probably a paid posted. How is that not being civil?

Why did you remove my comment and not the one where the poster called me insane?

1. Never called you a bot.

2. You have no link to a source in the thread I was replying to.

3. Anyone who looks at the things Putin has done in the last two years and thinks that NATO is worse is the one who is insane.

Send people to all corners of the Internet to sow your pro-Russian stance. And if not paid, I would say a Putin fan, someone being threatened by the Russian government, or just a troll. Take your pick. All are possible.

Removed by mod

So does tobacco use. If people are going to use this study as a reason to ban marijuana, then shouldn’t we ban tobacco as well?

I hope any person who has to go to trial and this officer is called as a witness uses this as an example as to why they arent a good witness.

“Officer, in 2023 you fatally shot a man after you said he got out of his car and lunged at you with a knife. You later backtracked on this and said he was in his car with the windows up. How can we trust what you have to say if you can’t remember what happened then?”

I feel like if criminals didn’t basically Google “How to kill someone and get away with it” the justice system would never convict a person.

I have a cab company in my city (near Chicago) that you can order it online or in the app for now or in the future and it is cheaper than Lyft/Uber. No hailing a cab like back in the old days.

And video games.

I am absolutely floored that she survived too. Was she the only one wearing a seatbelt?