- 360 Posts
- 715 Comments
0·8 months agoWound up inverted in a flat spin. No way out of that one.
On the other hand, Russia shot down one of their own fighters today, so there’s that.
Well Biden could have put in the troops needed that Trump removed I suppose. Tear up the capitulation, etc.
This was always going to happen. Once Trump signed the surrender, and released Taliban fighters, some of which run this government, the die was cast.
Ukraine enters the conversation
Chaos is not a better option when others have to stabilize the country. I think UN peacekeepers have been there 4 times. The US has had to intercede at least that many.
Haitians wanted Doc and Baby Doc. What they always get is chaos.
New submarines!
No, if he is extradited he answers the charge. If he is in a country that has a prior charge then the respective justice departments work out who has priority. In this case he was already charged in Britan before being indicated in the US with extradition requested
I don’t believe treason is applicable. But, it’s not unusual for some countries, Britain included, to question US charges on extradition. They don’t believe in the death penalty. Since the indictment is sealed, they don’t know.
That doesn’t matter. Charges are in a sealed indictment. I doubt they have anything to do with his publication. He helped Chelsea Manning hack into a US military server. That’s esponge and computer theft. But, it is not known what the charges are because they are sealed.
It’s like any other country. When you set feet on US ground you are under US law. All the laws. Doesn’t matter if you are a foreign national or not.
Edit: if any of you travel internationally you would know this. At least I hope you would.
The US has to be at war to charge treason.
IDk what kind of explosives they are now putting on their drones, but they pack quite a wallop.
A cascading failure event. Luckily, there is already infrastructure money, so we don’t have to watch Congress dithering.
Hungary.
Of course…
Everything Netanyahu does is to further his own political objectives. He wants to keep the life expectancy of his government going as long as possible because he would lose decisively if elections were held today. So he believes that painting a picture of “Everyone is against us, Israel vs. the world,” is in his own selfish, narrow interests.
And if he were out of power, he’d likely be headed to jail.
So in other words, we should show up, swarm over the building, force them to flee for their lives, and spread literal shit on the inside walls, during oral argument. And that would not be “obstruction of an official proceeding”.
Do I understand you correctly, Mr. Roberts?