https://releases.grayjay.app/app-arm64-v8a-release.apk
Still in alpha and the source code is not public yet, but full release is September at the latest I think.
Theres also GrayJay, its pretty new tho
I wish them luck with that!
Weirdly enough, I went to a book store one time, picked up one of his newer books, didn’t think I’d like it from the summary, but I read the first few pages and was hooked. Had to leave so I figured I would read the rest by downloading from libgen.is…
First time I’ve felt significantly disappointed not being able to read a book :'(
No, he just said AI isn’t like human brains because its a “statistical machine”. What I’m asking is how he knows that human brains aren’t statistical machines?
Human brains aren’t that good at direct math calculation either!
Also he definitely didn’t explain what “lost art” is.
How do you know human brains don’t work in roughly the same way chatbots and image generators work?
What is art? And what does it mean for it to become “lost”?
Not to mention, what prevents a future release of the feature either turning the percentage to 0% or removing the hold-back entirely?
Imo thats like the main issue here. Google tweaks chromium changing a single number and everything goes to shit. This proposal is a trojan horse!
your devs will just write other server backend code that is forked off of yours that won’t “hold back”.
Isn’t it the client (i.e. the browser) that holds back randomly? The server for any service can’t force clients to send an attestation.
An alternative idea to allow a user to be apart of multiple instances simultaneously: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3416
Rage is profitable!
I thought cities in the Netherlands were required to have public transit?
Unless the cars on the road are going to fast for comfort or are too agressive, then do whatever you can to not feel like you are going to die at any moment.
And which person from the 1950s
Love GrapheneOS, don’t love the weird combative community culture, or (former) lead developer tho…
Hmmm… words used in not-satiric circumstances where the true meaning isn’t the intended meaning is a bit confusing…
Hmmm, I guess I don’t like the reasoning “extreme version of complicated idea is bad, therefore the idea is bad in general”. Like its fine to dislike an idea’s extremes, but it would be disingenuous to also dismiss its more moderate forms.
everyone is equal and thus should have equal rights and treatment under the law
Isn’t that like the definition of (clasical) liberalism?
The mechanistic reasoning might be plausible, but is there any actual examples of a modern capitalist society regressing back to some form of feudalism to any significant degree?
The point where I’d be worried is when a single company is the majority of a country’s GDP or has complete control over the government. The only examples I can think of that even get close to these possibilities are South Korea’s Chaebols or Hong Kong’s corporate voting block.
Does anyone else see “removed” in this comment? Is the instance editing comments to censor certain words or is it just the user?